Re: Python 3 reviewers

2018-02-22 Thread Pablo Estrada
I'm not a committer, but willing to help review and

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, 8:54 PM Holden Karau  wrote:

> So I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 reviews for the same
> reason I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 work (on the
> commit side seems to move more slowly than the devs), but I suppose that
> does become somewhat of a self fulfilling prophecy. I'll dedicate some more
> cycles to helping with the reviews :)
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Ahmet Altay  wrote:
>
>> Thank you Holden for doing this work. I agree with Robert's comment. I
>> know there are a few folks working on this now (you, @luke-zhu and
>> @cclauss). Perhaps you could do python 3 related code reviews within that
>> group. I would be happy to chime in and review some chunks as well.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and
>>> have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as
>>> they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my
>>> way.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau 
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Y'all,
>>> >
>>> > I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm
>>> having
>>> > a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any
>>> > committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If
>>> not
>>> > no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > Holden :)
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>
-- 
Got feedback? go/pabloem-feedback


Re: Python 3 reviewers

2018-02-22 Thread Holden Karau
So I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 reviews for the same
reason I've been hesistant to do large chunks of Python 3 work (on the
commit side seems to move more slowly than the devs), but I suppose that
does become somewhat of a self fulfilling prophecy. I'll dedicate some more
cycles to helping with the reviews :)

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Ahmet Altay  wrote:

> Thank you Holden for doing this work. I agree with Robert's comment. I
> know there are a few folks working on this now (you, @luke-zhu and
> @cclauss). Perhaps you could do python 3 related code reviews within that
> group. I would be happy to chime in and review some chunks as well.
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw 
> wrote:
>
>> I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and
>> have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as
>> they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my
>> way.
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau 
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Y'all,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm
>> having
>> > a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any
>> > committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If
>> not
>> > no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Holden :)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>>
>
>


-- 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau


Re: Python 3 reviewers

2018-02-22 Thread Ahmet Altay
Thank you Holden for doing this work. I agree with Robert's comment. I know
there are a few folks working on this now (you, @luke-zhu and @cclauss).
Perhaps you could do python 3 related code reviews within that group. I
would be happy to chime in and review some chunks as well.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 4:54 PM, Robert Bradshaw 
wrote:

> I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and
> have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as
> they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my
> way.
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau 
> wrote:
> > Hi Y'all,
> >
> > I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm
> having
> > a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any
> > committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If
> not
> > no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Holden :)
> >
> > --
> > Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau
>


Re: Python 3 reviewers

2018-02-22 Thread Robert Bradshaw
I'd really like to see Python 3 support sooner rather than later, and
have been reviewing some (simple) PRs in this direction. As long as
they're broken up into small enough chunks, feel free to send some my
way.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Holden Karau  wrote:
> Hi Y'all,
>
> I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm having
> a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there any
> committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If not
> no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Holden :)
>
> --
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau


Python 3 reviewers

2018-02-22 Thread Holden Karau
Hi Y'all,

I'm trying to make some progress on Python 3 support for Beam but I'm
having a bit of difficulty finding people with review bandwidth. Are there
any committers with time to spare who would be willing to work on this? If
not no worries I'll refocus my efforts elsewhere :)

Cheers,

Holden :)

-- 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/holdenkarau