Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-15 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Ok, if it's annoying the description can be removed. It will still match extensions though. On Sat, Feb 15, 2020, 00:58 Kyle Weaver wrote: > I suppose that'd be okay. It doesn't look like the descriptions add too > much information. > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 3:55 PM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > >>

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-13 Thread Kyle Weaver
I'm really enjoying this feature so far! The "Pull Requests" page for Beam is now way more readable. Thanks Alex :) On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:18 PM Alex Van Boxel wrote: > What do you exactly mean with github grep... where is it an issue. I find > it useful for searching here: > > [image:

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Alex Van Boxel
What do you exactly mean with github grep... where is it an issue. I find it useful for searching here: [image: Screen Shot 2020-02-13 at 06.11.33.png] OK, you get some false positives, but then the color coding works. You can't search on a category so this looks like the only alternative. I was

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Alex would you consider removing the descriptions from the labels? It seems that github greps not only the text of the label but also the text of the description producing false positives, e.g. if I search the label `io` it resolves not only all the IOs but also results like `core` because it

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Ismaël Mejía
The prefix is just extra characters makes readibility worse, notice that the full category (e.g. ios/runners/etc) will match because we have an extra tag equivalent to the prefix, so filtering is still possible. you rarely need to filter for more than one criteria, that's why github does not allow

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Ismael, I saw that you removed the prefix. I still want to have some grouping between the subtypes, so I color coded them. I also added all the labels in the file. We now have 62 labels. _/ _/ Alex Van Boxel On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:03 PM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > Forgot to mention, older PRs

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Forgot to mention, older PRs will look not classified, up to you guys if you want to do manually. All new PRs will be automatically labeled. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:02 PM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > For info Alex's PR to suport autolabeler was merged today and INFRA > enabled the plugin. > I

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-12 Thread Ismaël Mejía
For info Alex's PR to suport autolabeler was merged today and INFRA enabled the plugin. I created an artificial PR to check it was autolabeled correctly. It is working perfectly now. Thanks Alex ! On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:23 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote: > +1 to finding the right balance. > > I do

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-11 Thread Robert Bradshaw
+1 to finding the right balance. I do think per-runner makes sense, rather than a general "runners." IOs might make sense as well. Not sure about all the extensions-* I'd leave those out for now. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:56 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > > > So I propose going simple with a limited

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-11 Thread Ismaël Mejía
> So I propose going simple with a limited set of labels. Later on we can refine. Don't forget that does labels only are useful during the life-cycle of a PR. Labels are handy for quick filtering and finding PRs we care about for example to review. I agree with the feeling that we should not go

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-11 Thread Alex Van Boxel
I'm wondering if we're not taking it too far with those detailed labels. It's like going from nothing to super details. The simples use-case hasn't proven itself in practice yet. So I propose going simple with a limited set of labels. Later on we can refine. Don't forget that does labels only are

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-11 Thread Ismaël Mejía
Let some comments too, let's keep the discussion on refinements in the PR. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 9:13 AM jincheng sun wrote: > I left comments on PR, the main suggestion is that we may need a > discussion about what kind of labels should be add. I would like to share > my thoughts as follows:

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-11 Thread jincheng sun
I left comments on PR, the main suggestion is that we may need a discussion about what kind of labels should be add. I would like to share my thoughts as follows: I think we need to add labels according to some rules. For example, the easiest way is to add labels by languages, java / python / go

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Alex Van Boxel
I've opened a PR and a ticket with INFRA. PR: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/10824 _/ _/ Alex Van Boxel On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:57 AM jincheng sun wrote: > +1. Autolabeler seems really cool and it seems that it's simple to > configure and set up. > > Best, > Jincheng > > > > Udi

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread jincheng sun
+1. Autolabeler seems really cool and it seems that it's simple to configure and set up. Best, Jincheng Udi Meiri 于2020年2月11日周二 上午2:01写道: > Cool! > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:27 AM Robert Burke wrote: > >> +1 to autolabeling >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, 9:21 AM Luke Cwik wrote: >> >>> Nice

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Udi Meiri
Cool! On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:27 AM Robert Burke wrote: > +1 to autolabeling > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, 9:21 AM Luke Cwik wrote: > >> Nice >> >> On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:52 AM Alex Van Boxel wrote: >> >>> Ha, cool. I'll have a look at the autolabeler. The infra stuff is not >>> something

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Robert Burke
+1 to autolabeling On Mon, Feb 10, 2020, 9:21 AM Luke Cwik wrote: > Nice > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:52 AM Alex Van Boxel wrote: > >> Ha, cool. I'll have a look at the autolabeler. The infra stuff is not >> something I've looked at... I'll dive into that. >> >> _/ >> _/ Alex Van Boxel >> >>

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Luke Cwik
Nice On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 2:52 AM Alex Van Boxel wrote: > Ha, cool. I'll have a look at the autolabeler. The infra stuff is not > something I've looked at... I'll dive into that. > > _/ > _/ Alex Van Boxel > > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > >> +1 >> >> You don't

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Alex Van Boxel
Ha, cool. I'll have a look at the autolabeler. The infra stuff is not something I've looked at... I'll dive into that. _/ _/ Alex Van Boxel On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:49 AM Ismaël Mejía wrote: > +1 > > You don't need to write your own action, there is already one autolabeler > action [1]. >

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Ismaël Mejía
+1 You don't need to write your own action, there is already one autolabeler action [1]. INFRA can easily configure it for Beam (as they did for Avro [2]) if we request it. The plugin is quite easy to configure and works like a charm [3]. [1] https://github.com/probot/autolabeler [1]

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-10 Thread Alexey Romanenko
Great initiative, thanks Alex! I was thinking to add such labels into PR title but I believe that GitHub labels are better since it can be used easily for filtering, for example. Maybe it could be useful to add more granulation for labels, like “release”, “runners”, “website”, etc but I’m

Re: Labels on PR

2020-02-09 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
ThanksIt sounds good to me. Regards JBLe lun. 10 f?vr. 2020 ? 08:35, Alex Van Boxel a ?crit :I've started putting labels on PR's. I've done the first page for now (as I'm afraid putting them on older once could affect the stale bot. I hope this is ok.For now I'm only focussing on language and I'm