Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Jia, Thank you for your clarification. Francesco, It might be good for you to send a pull request by putting your docker files to directory 'docker'. So people who has docker experiences can review it. - Sijie On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Jia Zhai wrote: > Regarding

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Regarding push docker images into apache account, there was an update in our bi-weekly-meeting notes, which including example of others. >From my view, the first step is to have a "docker" dir, which is mentioned by sijie, in bookkeeper repo, to contains Docker Build related files. We could do it

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

I wrote the first draft of the proposal: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BP-10+-+Official+Bookkeeper+Docker+Image Any suggestion would be appreciated. On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 12:56 +, Francesco Caliumi - Diennea wrote: Thanks Sijie, I will re-read docker hub guidelines

Verify signature for BookKeeper releases

Hi all, While developing the Docker image Francesco noticed that it is not very clear how to find the official signature of BookKeeper release If an user browses to: http://bookkeeper.apache.org/releases.html#download gets to: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/bookkeeper and there is a

Build failed in Jenkins: bookkeeper-master #1790

See -- [...truncated 1.11 MB...] Running org.apache.bookkeeper.bookie.UpdateCookieCmdTest Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.22 sec - in

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Hey Francesco, Thanks for putting this together. I have a couple of comments from our side: - I'm not sure whether this is an issue for others, and would actually be interested in hearing whether it is or not, but the use of Alpine is a deal breaker for us because of the GPL lawsuit stories

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Il mar 20 giu 2017, 19:45 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > Hi Francesco, > > - regarding the gpg, if we make pushing the new docker image as part of the > release procedure, we should be able to support that. > - regarding the directory name, is 'docker' enough? any reason that you >

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Il mar 20 giu 2017, 19:45 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > > > Hi Francesco, > > > > - regarding the gpg, if we make pushing the new docker image as part of > the > > release procedure, we should be able

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Either centos or debian should work for us. Actually, another data point that I got from a colleague is that only centos works well with dcos-commons according to his experience, which others might not care, but we use with our stuff. And, thanks for the clarification on configuration

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Hi Flavio, On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 15:40 +0200, Flavio Junqueira wrote: Hey Francesco, Thanks for putting this together. I have a couple of comments from our side: - I'm not sure whether this is an issue for others, and would actually be interested in hearing whether it is or not, but the use

Re: Official Bookkeeper Docker Image

Hi Francesco, - regarding the gpg, if we make pushing the new docker image as part of the release procedure, we should be able to support that. - regarding the directory name, is 'docker' enough? any reason that you prefix with 'bookkeeper-docker‘? Also, does anyone follow up with INFRA - how

Re: Verify signature for BookKeeper releases

Sounds like a documentation improvement on Download/Release pages? - Sijie On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi all, > While developing the Docker image Francesco noticed that it is not > very clear how to find the official signature of BookKeeper