Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 from me as well. - packages (both source & binary) are good. shasum, asc are good - source package can compile and run localbookie - binary package can run localbookie and bookie shell - deploy the package into gcp and aws and run a load test over the weekend. all is good - Sijie On Fri,

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 Checked: * Src and bin distribution * Checked signatures, checksums * License and Notice * Compiled and ran test in Pulsar with this RC version Matteo On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 2:42 PM Sijie Guo wrote: > +1 from me as well. > > - packages (both source & binary) are

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.0, release candidate #1

2018-04-16 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 - GPG signatures look good - Run tests locally from source archive, all okay apart from a know test which always fail on my laptop (already reported https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1019). - Run tests on several projects without problems - Run the candidate on my 'famous' cluster