Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.2, release candidate #0

2018-08-28 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) verified signatures/sha, RAT, spotbugs built and run tests from src candidate package (on Linux Fedora 27, Oracle JDK8) tested with some client application I have these flaky tests (not blocker for release): the first BookieInitializationTest) is very usual on Fedora machines, I have

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.2, release candidate #0

2018-08-28 Thread Sijie Guo
According to http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums, we need sha512 not sha1. Since it only changes the signatures files, I didn't cancel the vote. Please review the sha512 files instead. - Sijie On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 8:03 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.7.2, release candidate #0

2018-08-28 Thread Matteo Merli
+1 (binding) * Checked signatures, LICENSES * Checked Maven repository * Started localbookie On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:54 AM Sijie Guo wrote: > According to http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums, > we need sha512 not sha1. > > Since it only changes the signatures