Is Apache BookKeeper has its own Slack team? If it has then we could just
add a channel for DistLog.
- Henry
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Awesome +1
>
> Il mar 25 lug 2017, 05:39 Dustin Castor
> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Agreed! Or an IRC.
> >
> > On Monday, July 24, 20
s have
> accepted our invitations to join Apache BookKeeper PMC on behalf of the
> Apache BookKeeper PMC.
>
> - Dave Rusek (drusek)
> - Franck Cuny (fcuny)
> - Henry Saputra (hsaputra)
> - Leigh Stewart (lstewart)
>
> Please join me in thanking them for their contributions to Dis
We could have a VOTE.
But, I think there iff there is no concern or main objection from DISCUSS
thread, we could move to Github via Gtibox without VOTE.
Once done, we just need to do official ANNOUNCE to make sure dev@ at
bookkeeper and dost-log knows about the changes and what to expect.
I am +
+1 (binding)
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good - need to be updated to 2021 but should not be
blocker
Signature file looks good
Checksum file matched
No binary in the source artifact distribution
Source compiled and tests passed (OSX, Java 1.8)
- Henry
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 5:34 A
ding:
> * Amit Chavan
> * Matteo Minardi
> * Henry Saputra
> * Sijie Guo
> * Enrico Olivelli
>
> There are no disapproving votes.
>
> Thanks everyone!
>
> I will proceed with the release procedure
>
> Enrico Olivelli
>
> Il giorno lun 11 gen 2021 alle or
Thanks for the quick turn around on this, Enrico
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021, 9:30 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Sorry about that.
> You can find the image here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21000
>
> btw the Docker image for 14.2.1 is now available on Dockerhub
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno g
+1 (binding)
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
Signature file looks good
Checksum file matched
No binary in the source artifact distribution
RAT, Checkstyle passed
Source compiled and tests passed (OSX, Java 1.8)
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:48 AM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:27)
>
onf of allowloopback=true,
> >> > 'bin/bookkeeper standalone'
> >> > and 'bin/bookkeeper shell bookiesanity' runs well.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > some small issues need to be fix:
> >> > "gpg --verify&quo
Thanks for driving the release, @Andrey
Congrats to Apache BookKeeper community.
- Henry
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 12:00 PM Andrey Yegorov wrote:
> The Apache BookKeeper team is proud to announce Apache BookKeeper version
> 4.13.0.
>
> Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, fault-tolerant, and low-lat
Any implication on the project's release process to comply with FIPS if it
turns on by default?
- Henry
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:56 PM Anup Ghatage wrote:
> Hi Bookies,
>
> FIPS is 'Federal Information Processing Standard'. Basically it's a set of
> guidelines for security functions such as e
Anyone has seen the 404 error when trying to merge PR with BK merge script:
Unable to fetch URL, exiting:
https://api.github.com/repos/apache/bookkeeper/pulls/2697/merge - HTTP
Error 404: Not Found
HTTP Error 404: Not Found
I started to see this error last week.We are using the Github API to merg
= python3
> /bk-merge-pr3.py
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 12:31 PM Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > Anyone has seen the 404 error when trying to merge PR with BK merge
> script:
> >
> > Unable to fetch URL, exiting:
> > https://api.github.com/repos/apach
lem today.
> I used bk-merge-pr3.py, merged a couple of PRs successfully, and then got
> 404.
>
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2697#issuecomment-831494536
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:42 AM Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Anup. It used to work for me u
I am +1 for having next release as 4.14.0
- Henry
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 2:51 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Overall +1 for 4.14.0 - the milestone is due May 16th anyway.
> There is nothing that breaks compatibility with 4.13 so we can skip 4.13.1.
>
> One thing I'd love to see in 4.14 is
> https:/
Hi Andrey,
How did you generate the source release artifact? Looks like it is missing
some files like the site directory and the gradle build files.
- Henry
On Sun, May 9, 2021 at 11:16 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the versi
/2714
> >
> > I can either rebuild the RC or we can decide to proceed.
> > Gradle was not used to build/release 4.14.0
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:34 AM Andrey Yegorov <
> andrey.yego...@datastax.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
+1 to the plan
- Henry
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:51 PM Andrey Yegorov wrote:
> I am ok releasing 4.14.1 now.
> I have finalized all the steps for the 4.14: updated the site etc.
> I will NOT send an email about the 4.14.0 release and we'll use 4.14.1
> to notify the community to limit the distr
- LICENSE and NOTICE files look good
- Source compiled and tests passed
- Signature file looks good
- Checksum file looks good
- No binary executables in source release artifacts
- Run locally in OSX with Java 8.
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 3:13 AM Enrico Olivelli wrot
Thanks, Enrico. Will look into it.
- Henry
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 5:11 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> the merge script has a problem, it downloads only the first page of
> "labels" from GH, so it is not able to find any "type/xxx" label anymore.
>
> I have prepared a fix (I used
HI Nicolo,
I agree these double dependencies updating for Maven and Gradle are not
ideal.
We will start working on adding Github actions to use gradle to run int
tests. Once the actions are active and working, we can start removing Maven
as the build tool for BK.
Sincerely apologize for the delay
order to track all
> next steps needed to remove maven from the project; in this way other
> contributors (e.g. me) can help speeding up the implementation
>
> Nicolò Boschi
>
> Il giorno gio 16 set 2021 alle ore 19:49 Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scrit
Ack for this one. I have encountered this issue for some PRs.
- Henry
On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 2:44 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hello,
> The bk-merge-script has new problems, now it fails for me consistently, it
> looks like a problem with the GH Merge API, see the error message below.
>
> In Pul
ache Spark was doing.
I am +1 to just use Github merge tool.
- Henry
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 10:05 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Do we need some VOTE?
>
> I think we do not need it
>
> But we should update the committer guide
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 20 Ott 2021, 18:50 H
Thanks, Enrico. I wonder why the prior PR pass the CI build =(
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:03 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Hello,
> It looks like the master branch is broken.
>
> This is the patch that broke the build
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2842
>
> I wonder how I could pass i
gt; > binding and 1 non-binding);
> > >
> > > Binding votes:
> > > * Flavio
> > > * Jia
> > > * Enrico
> > > * Henry
> > >
> > > Non-Binding votes:
> > > * Yong
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
>
Woot, congratulations, Jack!
Well deserved.
- Henry
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 2:38 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache BookKeeper
> has invited Jack Vanlightly to become a committer and we are pleased
> to announce that he has accepted.
>
>
> Being a com
Hi All, Happy New Year 2022!
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache BookKeeper has invited
Prashant Kumar to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he
has accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the poject since there is
no need to go via the patch s
Ack and Sounds good to me, Andrey.
- Henry
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 1:46 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> I merged it to let Nicolo continue on this.
> I cannot review all 64000 lines there ;) but I cursory looked at the
> changes + they are isolated
> in their own directory and we can always rebuild
Woot! Congrats, Andrey!
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> I am happy to announce that Andrey Yegorov joined today the Apache
> BookKeeper PMC !
>
> If you are curious and you want to know more about how Apache works
> and what is a PMC you can read this page
> https://www
+1 (binding)
Source artifact compiled and pass tests
Checksum files look good
Signature file looks good
Source artifacts does not contain executable
LICENSE file exists
Thanks,
Henry
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 2:09 PM Andrey Yegorov
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the releas
have 4 binding +1s and I'll close the vote and proceed with the release.
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 10:34 AM Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Source artifact compiled and pass tests
> > Checksum files look good
> > Signature file looks
+1 (binding)
Source artifact compiled and pass tests
Checksum files look good
Signature file looks good
Source artifacts does not contain executable files
LICENSE file exists
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:28 AM Nicolò Boschi wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #0
The contributors from Splunk contributed the Gradle build system with the
hope that it would replace Maven as the build system for BK, which offers
more flexibility and performance.
The team has been trying to continue our contributions for updating and
fixing the Gradle issues, and the dual build
34 matches
Mail list logo
