Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #2

+1, - verified both packages checksum ( asc and sha1 all good) - the source package build and test all run successfully. - in binary package, bin/bookkeeper and command localbookie runs well. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) - Run manually basic tests with local bookie (on Fedora, with jdk8) - Packaged bookkeeper-server.jar into real application (with known java9 issues with BK) and run cleanly on jdk10 - Verified artifacts and signatures on staging repository Enrico 2018-04-03 15:17 GMT+02:00 Ivan

Re: [VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #2

+1 lgtm RAT, FINDBUGS & TESTS: Runs cleanly. I had -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=2 set, but I don't think anything even flaked. Minor issue: Vertx http tests expect 8080 to be free SHA1 & SIGs: Good. LICENSE & NOTICE: Nothing changed since 4.6.1, so looks good. Minor: Copyright in

[VOTE] Apache BookKeeper Release 4.6.2, release candidate #2

Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 4.6.2, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The