Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub
Cool. Thank you Enrico! - Sijie On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 4:06 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > It is all done now > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags > > We should update the release guide > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 09:03 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> I have compared our git tags for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and 4.10.0 >> >> it seems that we missed these special "tags": >> >> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.9.2-docker >> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.10.0-docker >> >> It seems that we changed something in 4.8.2 with this commit from @Ivan >> Kelly >> >> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commit/5e9828b795d7ef82c17f72a6c9efb6d0e0b4c8d7 >> >> Enrico >> >> Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 07:56 Sijie Guo >> ha scritto: >> >>> Enrico, >>> >>> It is docker autobuild. We don't manage this part. I would suggest >>> filling an INFRA ticket to see what is the issue. >>> >>> - Sijie >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:59 AM Enrico Olivelli >>> wrote: >>> @Sijie Guo @Ivan Kelly Do you have any idea ? I can't remember if we have ever switched to a new way of pushing such tags. Enrico Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 11:02 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > It looks like dockerhub lost our latest tags: 4.9.2 and 4.10.0. > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags > > IIRC when I released 4.10.0 the image was there, but I may be wrong. > > Shall we open a ticket to INFRA ? > > Enrico >
Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub
It is all done now https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags We should update the release guide Enrico Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 09:03 Enrico Olivelli ha scritto: > I have compared our git tags for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and 4.10.0 > > it seems that we missed these special "tags": > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.9.2-docker > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.10.0-docker > > It seems that we changed something in 4.8.2 with this commit from @Ivan > Kelly > > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commit/5e9828b795d7ef82c17f72a6c9efb6d0e0b4c8d7 > > Enrico > > Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 07:56 Sijie Guo ha > scritto: > >> Enrico, >> >> It is docker autobuild. We don't manage this part. I would suggest >> filling an INFRA ticket to see what is the issue. >> >> - Sijie >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:59 AM Enrico Olivelli >> wrote: >> >>> @Sijie Guo @Ivan Kelly >>> Do you have any idea ? >>> >>> I can't remember if we have ever switched to a new way of pushing such >>> tags. >>> >>> Enrico >>> >>> Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 11:02 Enrico Olivelli < >>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >>> Hi, It looks like dockerhub lost our latest tags: 4.9.2 and 4.10.0. https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags IIRC when I released 4.10.0 the image was there, but I may be wrong. Shall we open a ticket to INFRA ? Enrico >>>
Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub
I have compared our git tags for 4.9.1 and 4.9.2 and 4.10.0 it seems that we missed these special "tags": https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.9.2-docker https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/tree/release-4.10.0-docker It seems that we changed something in 4.8.2 with this commit from @Ivan Kelly https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/commit/5e9828b795d7ef82c17f72a6c9efb6d0e0b4c8d7 Enrico Il giorno mar 3 dic 2019 alle ore 07:56 Sijie Guo ha scritto: > Enrico, > > It is docker autobuild. We don't manage this part. I would suggest filling > an INFRA ticket to see what is the issue. > > - Sijie > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:59 AM Enrico Olivelli > wrote: > >> @Sijie Guo @Ivan Kelly >> Do you have any idea ? >> >> I can't remember if we have ever switched to a new way of pushing such >> tags. >> >> Enrico >> >> Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 11:02 Enrico Olivelli < >> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >>> Hi, >>> It looks like dockerhub lost our latest tags: 4.9.2 and 4.10.0. >>> >>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags >>> >>> IIRC when I released 4.10.0 the image was there, but I may be wrong. >>> >>> Shall we open a ticket to INFRA ? >>> >>> Enrico >>> >>
Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub
Enrico, It is docker autobuild. We don't manage this part. I would suggest filling an INFRA ticket to see what is the issue. - Sijie On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:59 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > @Sijie Guo @Ivan Kelly > Do you have any idea ? > > I can't remember if we have ever switched to a new way of pushing such > tags. > > Enrico > > Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 11:02 Enrico Olivelli < > eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> Hi, >> It looks like dockerhub lost our latest tags: 4.9.2 and 4.10.0. >> >> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags >> >> IIRC when I released 4.10.0 the image was there, but I may be wrong. >> >> Shall we open a ticket to INFRA ? >> >> Enrico >> >
Re: Missing BookKeeper tags on dockerhub
@Sijie Guo @Ivan Kelly Do you have any idea ? I can't remember if we have ever switched to a new way of pushing such tags. Enrico Il giorno ven 29 nov 2019 alle ore 11:02 Enrico Olivelli < eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > It looks like dockerhub lost our latest tags: 4.9.2 and 4.10.0. > > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/bookkeeper/tags > > IIRC when I released 4.10.0 the image was there, but I may be wrong. > > Shall we open a ticket to INFRA ? > > Enrico >
