On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 12:57 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi -
>
> This is great. Now that this is in the two projects (which share
> committers) will need to co-ordinate releases.
>
> Keep in mind the next Pulsar release needs to be based on a particular
> BookKeeper release. An Apache project cannot
> Keep in mind the next Pulsar release needs to be based on a particular
> BookKeeper release. An Apache project cannot release against another
> project's SNAPSHOT since that has not been validated by their release process.
The bookkeeper 4.7.0 release process should be starting soon, so it
sho
Hi -
This is great. Now that this is in the two projects (which share committers)
will need to co-ordinate releases.
Keep in mind the next Pulsar release needs to be based on a particular
BookKeeper release. An Apache project cannot release against another project's
SNAPSHOT since that has not
Great to see all these changes in!
-Ivan
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Great!
> Congrats
>
> Do you have any number to compare performances?
>
> Enrico
>
> Il gio 1 mar 2018, 19:06 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
>
>> Awesome work, Ivan & Jia!
>>
>> Congrats Pulsar community!
>
Great!
Congrats
Do you have any number to compare performances?
Enrico
Il gio 1 mar 2018, 19:06 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> Awesome work, Ivan & Jia!
>
> Congrats Pulsar community!
>
> - Sijie
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Matteo Merli wrote:
>
> > In Pulsar master branch, we have switched
Awesome work, Ivan & Jia!
Congrats Pulsar community!
- Sijie
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Matteo Merli wrote:
> In Pulsar master branch, we have switched the BookKeeper dependency from
> the Yahoo fork to the 4.7.0-SNAPSHOT version of BookKeeper from main master
> branch.
>
> All the the ch
