Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > +1 > > -- > AY > > On 11 May 2016 at 02:55:11, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.6. > > sha1: 52447873a361647a5e80c547adea9cf5ee85254a > Git: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko wrote: > +1 > > -- > AY > > On 11 May 2016 at 02:55:10, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote: > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6. > > sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da > Git: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > > > > > I propose the following

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Sam Tunnicliffe wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Aleksey Yeschenko > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -- > > AY > > > > On 11 May 2016 at 02:55:10, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote: > > > > I propose the

Re: Cassandra 2.0.x OOM during startsup - schema version inconsistency after reboot

Hi Michaels :-), My guess is this ticket will be closed with a "Won't Fix" resolution. Cassandra 2.0 is no longer supported and I have seen tickets being rejected like CASSANDRA-10510 . Would you like to upgrade to 2.1.last and see if you

Using writetime in CAS Lightweight transactions

Hi, I was working on maintaining counters in cassandra, I read that it is not 100% accurate, I have tested them to be extremely accurate with 3.0.5 but going by docs there may be slight in accuracy. Thinking about this I thought there may be 2 approaches to resolve this: 1. Read the existing

Re: Using writetime in CAS Lightweight transactions

It is not (yet) possible to use functions in LWT predicates. LWT only supports = and != plus IF (NOT) EXISTS right now Le 11 mai 2016 16:50, "Bhuvan Rawal" a écrit : > Hi, > > I was working on maintaining counters in cassandra, I read that it is not > 100% accurate, I have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6. > > sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da > Git: > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.6-tentative > Artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.6. > > sha1: 52447873a361647a5e80c547adea9cf5ee85254a > Git: > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.6-tentative >

Re: Using writetime in CAS Lightweight transactions

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:22 AM, DuyHai Doan wrote: > It is not (yet) possible to use functions in LWT predicates. LWT only > supports = and != plus IF (NOT) EXISTS right now > You're correct about functions not being supported, but we do actually support >, >=, <, <=,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.6. > > > > sha1: 52447873a361647a5e80c547adea9cf5ee85254a > > Git: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > > > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6. > > > > sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da > > Git: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6. > > sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da > Git: > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.6-tentative > Artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Jake Luciani wrote: > I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.6. > > sha1: 52447873a361647a5e80c547adea9cf5ee85254a > Git: > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.6-tentative >

Re: Using writetime in CAS Lightweight transactions

Hi Tyler/Doan, If we have already reached till the cell level and put the LWT condition on it im sure from a design standpoint it shouldnt be really difficult to get the cell write time and verify the same, maybe to be considered in a future release. In this case it looks cleaner and if

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.6

+1 --  AY On 11 May 2016 at 02:55:10, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote: I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.6. sha1: c17cbe1875a974a00822ffbfad716abde363c8da Git: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.6-tentative Artifacts:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.0.6

+1 --  AY On 11 May 2016 at 02:55:11, Jake Luciani (j...@apache.org) wrote: I propose the following artifacts for release as 3.0.6. sha1: 52447873a361647a5e80c547adea9cf5ee85254a Git: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.6-tentative