Re: Cassandra on RocksDB experiment result

2017-04-20 Thread Jeff Jirsa
Let's try to make this actionable. Long time contributors/committers/members of the PMC (especially you guys who have been working on internals for 4-8 years): Setting aside details of the implementation, does anyone feel that pluggable storage in itself is inherently a bad idea (so much so that

Re: Cassandra on RocksDB experiment result

2017-04-20 Thread Jason Brown
I'm +1 on the idea of a pluggable storage engine. There's clearly a bandwidth problem for developing/reviewing/maintain multiple storage engines, but I think having the interface is a good thing and can enhance testability. At a minimum I think it's worthwhile to explore the storage engine

RE: Cassandra on RocksDB experiment result

2017-04-20 Thread Jacques-Henri Berthemet
It's an interesting experiment! Did you test with more than 2 nodes? Do you expect scalability to be as linear as regular Cassandra? -- Jacques-Henri Berthemet -Original Message- From: Eric Stevens [mailto:migh...@gmail.com] Sent: jeudi 20 avril 2017 00:41 To: dev@cassandra.apache.org