[NOTICE] Mandatory relocation of Apache git repositories on git-wip-us.apache.org

2018-12-07 Thread Daniel Gruno
[IF YOUR PROJECT DOES NOT HAVE GIT REPOSITORIES ON GIT-WIP-US PLEASE DISREGARD THIS EMAIL; IT WAS MASS-MAILED TO ALL APACHE PROJECTS] Hello Apache projects, I am writing to you because you may have git repositories on the git-wip-us server, which is slated to be decommissioned in the coming mon

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-07 Thread Ariel Weisberg
Hi, Late but. 1. A 2. +1 3. +1 4. -1 5. -0 6. +1 RE 4, I think blocker is an important priority. High and urgent mean the same thing to me. Wish is fine, but that is too similar to low if you ask me. My ideal would be low, medium, high, blocker. Medium feels weird, but it's a real thing, it's

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-07 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
> On 7 Dec 2018, at 17:52, Ariel Weisberg wrote: > > Hi, > > Late but. No harm in them continuing to roll in, I’m just cognisant of needing to annoy everyone with a second poll, so no point perpetuating it past a likely unassailable consensus. > > 1. A > 2. +1 > 3. +1 > 4. -1 > 5. -0 > 6.

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-07 Thread Ariel Weisberg
Hi, I think I managed to not get confused. I evaluatec the two separately. I don't like or use environment both in terms of populating the field and searching on it. That information could go in the description and be just as useful to me personally. I have no problem with an optional platform

Re: JIRA Workflow Proposals

2018-12-07 Thread Benedict Elliott Smith
I see. Thanks for clarifying; I was confused by beginning with “RE 5" but discussing Environment. Bear in mind we’re not only replacing Environment with the Platform field, but also a number of labels that were searchable and indicated environment/platform information. Labels such as ‘Window