One more call for any additional comments/ feedback on the release
lifecycle document
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bS6sr-HSrHFjZb0welife6Qx7u3ZDgRiAoENMLYlfz8/edit#
Thanks,
Sumanth
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 1:01 AM Sumanth Pasupuleti <
sumanth.pasupuleti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Submitted
Is it common to have such strict release criteria from RC to GA...
Release Candidate (RC)
-
Thorough testing is performed, and if no bugs are found within a testing
period of one month, release is promoted to GA.
-
If bugs are found, fixes are made and above step is repeated
Have had multiple customer hit this CASSANDRA-15081 issue now, where
upgrading from older versions the sstables contain an unknown column (its
not present in the dropped_columns in the schema)
This bug is serious as reads return incorrect results and if you run scrub
it will drop the row. So
I have left some comments on the document. Apart from a few clarifications and
some minor changes, I feel its in a good shape. I think we should move forward
with it. We can refine the process, definitions & criteria as we learn.
Dinesh
> On Sep 11, 2019, at 11:15 AM, Sumanth Pasupuleti
>
