Thank you, Patrick!
> On Feb 11, 2020, at 3:05 PM, Patrick McFadin wrote:
>
> Survey is closed. Thank you everyone that took time to give your feedback.
> Here are the results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-7YTMZYLT7/
>
> Based on the feedback, these meetings are useful and this
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.0.20 for release.
sha1: 89edf5073ba4181dd2f70294cdbcb47f5a45c82e
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.0.20-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.6 for release.
sha1: cb779ab9a631c13a245926f55320392c4468c6f0
Git:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/3.11.6-tentative
Maven Artifacts:
Dependency management is discussed at Documentation
|
|
| |
Documentation
The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and
high availability without compro...
|
|
|
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 07:44:15 p.m. UTC, Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
Good point Deepak - we do have:
http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/development/dependencies.html
But we dont have details or process written down.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:02 AM Deepak Vohra
wrote:
>
> Dependency management is discussed at Documentation
>
> |
> |
> | |
> Documentation
>
Hello everyone,
I was looking into some library updates these dates as per user requests.
This made me think about one thing. As we approach the new version release,
were the versions of the libraries cassandra depends on sanitized in any
way? Is there an overall view or plans for updates? Or is
Quick answer to your question though is no, it's been entirely adhoc.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:50 AM Nate McCall wrote:
> I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation
> criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users
> complain about
> do you think it would be a good idea to get a certain
view on those and see what can be easily updated?
Yes!
With more up-to-date dependencies, Cassandra will work with other open
source software smoothly. Looking forward.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 2:44 PM Ekaterina Dimitrova
wrote:
>
> Hello
I would love to see an audit and rough plan on maintenance and evaluation
criteria, etc added to the wiki for discussion. We've had a couple of users
complain about library versions when including the aftifact as a dependency
(even though we don't support this, a lot of people do it). It would be
Survey is closed. Thank you everyone that took time to give your feedback.
Here are the results: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-7YTMZYLT7/
Based on the feedback, these meetings are useful and this seems to be the
ideal format:
1 Hour scheduled
Monthly
Rotate through 10AM-1PM PST to try
For specific versions of dependencies scroll down for the Compile Dependencies
and Managed Dependencies at Maven Repository: org.apache.cassandra »
cassandra-all » 4.0-alpha3
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
Maven Repository: org.apache.cassandra » cassandra-all » 4.0-alpha3
|
|
|
11 matches
Mail list logo
