I plan on doing some more thorough testing, it’s just a matter of finding
time.
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:17 PM Dinesh Joshi
wrote:
> Thanks for testing this out Jon. Apart from the compression ratio could
> you also test the insertion rate and GC? 14482 allows you to use full range
> of Zstd
Thanks for testing this out Jon. Apart from the compression ratio could you
also test the insertion rate and GC? 14482 allows you to use full range of Zstd
compression levels.
Dinesh
> On Mar 1, 2019, at 6:41 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I finally got around to doing some
Hey all,
I finally got around to doing some testing. Nothing too crazy, I had it
run on my laptop while I did other things around the house.
Test 1: Inserting Random Data in a K/V table, 10 million inserts
LZ4 compression rate: 0.909857609644112
ZStd: 0.6136099401596449
Test 2: Inserting
Thanks all for your input. The consensus is to go forward with this ticket.
Dinesh
On Friday, February 15, 2019, 12:54:20 PM PST, Sumanth Pasupuleti
wrote:
+1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:14 PM Dikang Gu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vinay Chella
> wrote:
>
> > We
+1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:14 PM Dikang Gu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vinay Chella
> wrote:
>
> > We have been using Zstd compressor across different products/services
> here
> > and have seen significant improvements, getting this in 4.0 would be a
> big
> > win.
> >
+1
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:27 AM Vinay Chella
wrote:
> We have been using Zstd compressor across different products/services here
> and have seen significant improvements, getting this in 4.0 would be a big
> win.
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Vinay Chella
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:19 AM Jeff
We have been using Zstd compressor across different products/services here
and have seen significant improvements, getting this in 4.0 would be a big
win.
+1
Thanks,
Vinay Chella
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:19 AM Jeff Jirsa wrote:
> +1
>
> --
> Jeff Jirsa
>
>
> > On Feb 15, 2019, at 9:35 AM,
Thanks Ariel & Jonathan.
Michael, I have addressed the comments in the issue so we're using the latest
jar now. I've posted the updated patch in the latest comment of the ticket. In
addition there is a JMH performance benchmark in the C* repo
(CompressorPerformance) that tests various
Seems low risk, potentially high reward.
I can run some tests next week to get a rough idea of how compression
ratios differ as well as if there's a difference in performance.
I won't be testing correctness, just looking at the performance profile.
Jon
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:56 AM Michael
+0.5
I skimmed the jira and github diff and a few things came to mind:
- There are multiple comments about using an older jar than the latest
version.
- I did not see any performance test results to form an opinion on any
gains/caveats as a user. This was the first thing I looked for.
- I did not
Hi,
I am +1 since it's an additional compressor and not the default.
Ariel
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd support.
> The consensus on the ticket was that it’s a very valuable addition
>
IMO "add a new compression class that has demonstrable benefits to Sushma
and Joseph" is sufficiently noninvasive that we should allow it into 4.0.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dinesh Joshi
wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd support.
> The
Hey folks,
Just wanted to get a pulse on whether we can proceed with ZStd support. The
consensus on the ticket was that it’s a very valuable addition without any risk
of destabilizing 4.0. It’s ready to go if there aren’t any objections.
Dinesh
Hi,
I am checking to see if we can include CASSANDRA-1448 in 4.0 release which
provides ZSTD compressor for Cassandra. Currently changes are under review,
implementation has unit test coverage similar to other compressors, also tested
in Instagram’s shadow clusters.
Implementation structure is
14 matches
Mail list logo
