On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> When there are permanent inconsistencies though (when the base is
>
>> consistent and the view has extraneous rows), it doesn't really matter
>> if the inconsistency is present on a subset or all view replicas,
>> since the inconsistency is a
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Paulo Motta
> wrote:
>
>> > Yes, it seems it will not be trivial. But if this is the common case in
>> common operations such as node addition or removal, it may significantly
>> reduce
>> (from RF*2 to RF+1
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:49 AM, Paulo Motta
wrote:
> > Is this a realistic case when Cassandra (unless I'm missing something) is
> limited to adding or removing a single node at a time? I'm sure this
> can happen under some sort of generic range movement of some
> sort (how does one initiate su
> Is this a realistic case when Cassandra (unless I'm missing something) is
limited to adding or removing a single node at a time? I'm sure this
can happen under some sort of generic range movement of some
sort (how does one initiate such movement, and why), but will it happen
under "normal" condit
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Paulo Motta
wrote:
>
> Good catch! This indeed seems to be a regression caused by
> CASSANDRA-13069, so I created CASSANDRA-14251 to restore the correct
> behavior.
>
I have a question about your patch
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...pauloric
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:54 AM, Paulo Motta
wrote:
> > 1. It seems that for example when RF=3, each one of the three base
> replicas will send a view update to the fourth "pending node". While this
> is not wrong, it's also inefficient - why send three copies of the same
> update? Wouldn't it b
> 1. It seems that for example when RF=3, each one of the three base replicas
> will send a view update to the fourth "pending node". While this is not
> wrong, it's also inefficient - why send three copies of the same update?
> Wouldn't it be more efficient that just one of the base replicas -
