RE: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
>> https://inflector.dev.java.net/ > > Who knows what has happened to the java.net projects? > Jenkins (nee Hudson) left when it was all falling apart > and I haven't seen any improvement since. Oracle has reorganized the URL structure and never bothered to put redirects in place. I'm not sure which of several inflector attempts this refers to. I did find a dev.java.net-related project on Jarvana though: http://www.jarvana.com/jarvana/browse/net/java/dev/inflector/inflector/0.7.0/?by=&order=&d=y On a tangent, if that inflector serves to pluralize messages: Be aware that this makes translating much harder (and probably impossible). If i18n is ever to become an issue, you'll want to switch to GNU gettext. Full details on pluralization in i18n are on http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/gettext/manual/html_node/Plural-forms.html Includes stuff you never wanted to know :-)
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Adding my +1 and closing the vote. The vote has passed - congratulations, we have a beta! :) I will deploy the distribution, and once that's done, we can start with announcements. John Huss +1 Aristedes Maniatis [PMC] +1 Malcolm Edgar +1 Michael Gentry [PMC] +1 Andrus Adamchik [PMC] +1 Thanks everybody! Andrus On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. > > A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] > as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your > votes. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
On 10/06/12 11:29pm, Michael Gentry wrote: +1 with caveats: Some sites listed in the NOTICE.txt could not be found: http://objectstyle.org/ashwood/ http://www.ognl.org/ That's now an Apache project. I fixed that reference. https://inflector.dev.java.net/ Who knows what has happened to the java.net projects? Jenkins (nee Hudson) left when it was all falling apart and I haven't seen any improvement since. Ashwood is missing (should it point to the GitHub repository now?) and I was getting connection timeouts for OGNL/Inflector, so they might be having server issues. Also, in BaseContext.java, deleteObject() is still deprecated. I thought we had decided to keep it around at one point? Thanks, mrg On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Malcolm Edgar wrote: +1 regards Malcolm Edgar On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Yeah, appreciate that. I hope once in Beta, we can fix bugs without introducing new ones :) On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: I'm hitting an exception executing a particular EJBQL query. It's a fairly basic query, and I only hit the problem with EJBQL; I can execute the equivalent query via a SelectQuery and it's fine. I don't have time right now to post the map, etc. But I wanted to mention it. I don't think it needs to hold up a b1 release; we can address whatever the underlying issue is in a subsequent release. I should point out: the query worked awhile ago. I'll try to track down the revision where it broke. Robert On Jun 8, 2012, at 6/83:26 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote: Hi guys, so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. Thanks, Andrus On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your votes. Thanks, Andrus [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ -- --> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
+1 with caveats: Some sites listed in the NOTICE.txt could not be found: http://objectstyle.org/ashwood/ http://www.ognl.org/ https://inflector.dev.java.net/ Ashwood is missing (should it point to the GitHub repository now?) and I was getting connection timeouts for OGNL/Inflector, so they might be having server issues. Also, in BaseContext.java, deleteObject() is still deprecated. I thought we had decided to keep it around at one point? Thanks, mrg On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Malcolm Edgar wrote: > +1 > > regards Malcolm Edgar > > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik >wrote: > > > Yeah, appreciate that. I hope once in Beta, we can fix bugs without > > introducing new ones :) > > > > On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > > > > > I'm hitting an exception executing a particular EJBQL query. It's a > > fairly basic query, and I only hit the problem with EJBQL; I can execute > > the equivalent query via a SelectQuery and it's fine. I don't have time > > right now to post the map, etc. But I wanted to mention it. I don't think > > it needs to hold up a b1 release; we can address whatever the underlying > > issue is in a subsequent release. I should point out: the query worked > > awhile ago. I'll try to track down the revision where it broke. > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 6/83:26 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > > > >> Hi guys, > > >> > > >> so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received > > any votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Andrus > > >> > > >> On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > >> > > >>> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 > > release. > > >>> > > >>> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form > and > > at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and > > cast your votes. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Andrus > > >>> > > >>> [1] > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > > >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
+1 regards Malcolm Edgar On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Yeah, appreciate that. I hope once in Beta, we can fix bugs without > introducing new ones :) > > On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > > > I'm hitting an exception executing a particular EJBQL query. It's a > fairly basic query, and I only hit the problem with EJBQL; I can execute > the equivalent query via a SelectQuery and it's fine. I don't have time > right now to post the map, etc. But I wanted to mention it. I don't think > it needs to hold up a b1 release; we can address whatever the underlying > issue is in a subsequent release. I should point out: the query worked > awhile ago. I'll try to track down the revision where it broke. > > > > Robert > > > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 6/83:26 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > >> Hi guys, > >> > >> so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received > any votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Andrus > >> > >> On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> > >>> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 > release. > >>> > >>> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and > at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and > cast your votes. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Andrus > >>> > >>> [1] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ > >> > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Yeah, appreciate that. I hope once in Beta, we can fix bugs without introducing new ones :) On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > I'm hitting an exception executing a particular EJBQL query. It's a fairly > basic query, and I only hit the problem with EJBQL; I can execute the > equivalent query via a SelectQuery and it's fine. I don't have time right now > to post the map, etc. But I wanted to mention it. I don't think it needs to > hold up a b1 release; we can address whatever the underlying issue is in a > subsequent release. I should point out: the query worked awhile ago. I'll try > to track down the revision where it broke. > > Robert > > On Jun 8, 2012, at 6/83:26 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any >> votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. >> >> Thanks, >> Andrus >> >> On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 >>> release. >>> >>> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at >>> [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast >>> your votes. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrus >>> >>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ >>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
On Jun 9, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > The only issues I've seen are that the RELEASE NOTES file is missing the list > of changes for b1, I think the changes are incorrectly shown under M4 (M4 was renamed to B1, but we forgot to rename it in RELEASE-NOTES). IMO it is not a show stopper, but we'll fix it before B2. > and the release is B1 rather than b1. I'm hoping that the case difference > will not confuse maven (which can get easily confused sometimes). Yeah, I used B1, as milestones were called M1,M2,M3... So kept it capitalized. Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
I'm +1. The only issues I've seen are that the RELEASE NOTES file is missing the list of changes for b1, and the release is B1 rather than b1. I'm hoping that the case difference will not confuse maven (which can get easily confused sometimes). Ari On 8/06/12 6:26pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote: Hi guys, so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. Thanks, Andrus On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your votes. Thanks, Andrus [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ -- --> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
I'm hitting an exception executing a particular EJBQL query. It's a fairly basic query, and I only hit the problem with EJBQL; I can execute the equivalent query via a SelectQuery and it's fine. I don't have time right now to post the map, etc. But I wanted to mention it. I don't think it needs to hold up a b1 release; we can address whatever the underlying issue is in a subsequent release. I should point out: the query worked awhile ago. I'll try to track down the revision where it broke. Robert On Jun 8, 2012, at 6/83:26 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Hi guys, > > so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any > votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 >> release. >> >> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at >> [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast >> your votes. >> >> Thanks, >> Andrus >> >> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Hi Andrus, I've just been lacking time to examine it. I'm hoping to get to it some time over the weekend. mrg On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Hi guys, > > so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any > votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 >> release. >> >> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at >> [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast >> your votes. >> >> Thanks, >> Andrus >> >> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
+1 to proceed On Friday, June 8, 2012, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Hi guys, > > so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any > votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > > > I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 > release. > > > > A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and > at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and > cast your votes. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrus > > > > [1] > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > > [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ > >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Hi guys, so any more questions/concerns about the release? We haven't received any votes yet. So we need to decide whether we should pull it or proceed. Thanks, Andrus On May 29, 2012, at 1:02 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. > > A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] > as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your > votes. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
RE: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
> but shouldn't it be interesting to close/resolve as much issues > as we can before a release?[1] Yes, but there's always one more issue to resolve. And while you resolve one, two others are being entered. So the real task is not getting all issues closed. Projects instead triage issues for the next release. And I think all projects (not just the ASF ones) do it that way, either explicitly or implicitly.
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
On Jun 4, 2012, at 5:48 PM, gilbertoca wrote: > Just a curious final user here - waiting this release - , but shouldn't it > be interesting to close/resolve as much issues as we can before a > release?[1] > Maybe, I'm not seen the big picture or don't understand how ASF project is > managed! Just like with any project, the goal is to ship the best product possible, but in some reasonable time. So these 2 have to be balanced. FWIW I have a very long list of things I want to see in Cayenne, and would prefer a permanent Alpha, but we have to ship stable releases occasionally :) So now that we cloned the Beta to a separate branch (and if the release vote passes), all bug fixes will be applied to trunk and that stable branch, all other changes that have a potential to destabilize the API or the framework will go on trunk. So the final release stays with a fixed feature set, but becomes more and more "stable" as we fix the the bugs. All the new stuff goes to trunk. > Other thing, I've started reading the docbook (well, where there is > something written! rs rs) and found some typos - setup.xml and > including-cayenne-in-project.xml [2]. I hope to help more with docs now. I'm > finally using the Cayenne in a real project. Awesome! Thanks for taking time to review the existing docs (yes, we still need to write a lot of those, something I hoped to accomplish while in beta). With this patch I guess I can manually fix the typos, so what you sent us is everything we need. Going forward I'd appreciate if you could open a Jira and attach patches to it. There is a little thing to check when you submit a patch explicitly authorizing ASF to use your contribution. Just a formality, but makes it easier for us to include the contribution in Cayenne. Thanks again, Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Hi, Just a curious final user here - waiting this release - , but shouldn't it be interesting to close/resolve as much issues as we can before a release?[1] Maybe, I'm not seen the big picture or don't understand how ASF project is managed! Other thing, I've started reading the docbook (well, where there is something written! rs rs) and found some typos - setup.xml and including-cayenne-in-project.xml [2]. I hope to help more with docs now. I'm finally using the Cayenne in a real project. Regards, Gilberto [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310903&statistictype=statuses&selectedProjectId=12310903&reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.reports%3Apie-report&Next=Next [2] https://dl.dropbox.com/u/9093640/docbook.patch -- View this message in context: http://cayenne.195.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Cayenne-3-1-beta-1-tp4019855p4024203.html Sent from the Cayenne - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
I guess no progress has been made on the tests. I'd suggest the same thing -
proceed with 3.1 Beta, and work on this in parallel.
Andrus
On Jun 4, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> Also, where are we with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1210? I ask
> because we have code in there, but as yet no functional tests for the new
> code.
>
> I think this should be fixed before 3.1, but I'm happy leaving it until after
> the beta. People are unlikely to trip over this since there is no documented
> API yet.
>
> Ari
>
>
> On 4/06/12 3:53pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> I would push it to 3.2. Exactly because I don't feel the issue is completely
>> solved here.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>>> Should we include this in 3.1?
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1622
>>>
>>> Also, unless I'm mistaken, the attached patch will still leave
>>> compilation warnings in the subclass, since only the superclass will
>>> get a newly generated serial number. I think I'd be more inclined to
>>> put @SuppressWarnings("serial") on both the subclass and superclass.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik
>>> wrote:
Hmm.. we didn't in the previous build on the same day:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/716/
and the change was kind of irrelevant to the build:
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cayenne/?cs=1343404
Andrus
On May 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2
>> release.
>>
>> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and
>> at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and
>> cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>> [1]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/
>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
>
>
> I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready
> for that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/
>
>
> java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column
> in statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL]
> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source)
> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
> at
> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57)
> at
> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45)
> at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188)
> at
> org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43)
>
>
> Is this a real test failure?
>
>
>
> Ari
>
>
>
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Also, where are we with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1210? I ask
because we have code in there, but as yet no functional tests for the new code.
I think this should be fixed before 3.1, but I'm happy leaving it until after
the beta. People are unlikely to trip over this since there is no documented
API yet.
Ari
On 4/06/12 3:53pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I would push it to 3.2. Exactly because I don't feel the issue is completely
solved here.
Andrus
On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
Should we include this in 3.1?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1622
Also, unless I'm mistaken, the attached patch will still leave
compilation warnings in the subclass, since only the superclass will
get a newly generated serial number. I think I'd be more inclined to
put @SuppressWarnings("serial") on both the subclass and superclass.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
mrg
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Hmm.. we didn't in the previous build on the same day:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/716/
and the change was kind of irrelevant to the build:
https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cayenne/?cs=1343404
Andrus
On May 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release.
A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2]
as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your
votes.
Thanks,
Andrus
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready for
that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/
java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column in
statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL]
at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source)
at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
at
org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57)
at
org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45)
at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131)
at
org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188)
at
org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43)
Is this a real test failure?
Ari
--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
I would push it to 3.2. Exactly because I don't feel the issue is completely
solved here.
Andrus
On Jun 3, 2012, at 5:29 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Should we include this in 3.1?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1622
>
> Also, unless I'm mistaken, the attached patch will still leave
> compilation warnings in the subclass, since only the superclass will
> get a newly generated serial number. I think I'd be more inclined to
> put @SuppressWarnings("serial") on both the subclass and superclass.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>> Hmm.. we didn't in the previous build on the same day:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/716/
>>
>> and the change was kind of irrelevant to the build:
>>
>> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cayenne/?cs=1343404
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On May 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2
release.
A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at
[2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast
your votes.
Thanks,
Andrus
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
>>>
>>>
>>> I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready
>>> for that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7:
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/
>>>
>>>
>>> java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column in
>>> statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL]
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source)
>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45)
>>> at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188)
>>> at
>>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43)
>>>
>>>
>>> Is this a real test failure?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Should we include this in 3.1?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1622
Also, unless I'm mistaken, the attached patch will still leave
compilation warnings in the subclass, since only the superclass will
get a newly generated serial number. I think I'd be more inclined to
put @SuppressWarnings("serial") on both the subclass and superclass.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
mrg
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Hmm.. we didn't in the previous build on the same day:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/716/
>
> and the change was kind of irrelevant to the build:
>
> https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cayenne/?cs=1343404
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>> On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2
>>> release.
>>>
>>> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at
>>> [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast
>>> your votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/
>>> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
>>
>>
>> I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready for
>> that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/
>>
>>
>> java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column in
>> statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL]
>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source)
>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source)
>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source)
>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57)
>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45)
>> at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131)
>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188)
>> at
>> org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43)
>>
>>
>> Is this a real test failure?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Hmm.. we didn't in the previous build on the same day: https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/716/ and the change was kind of irrelevant to the build: https://fisheye6.atlassian.com/changelog/cayenne/?cs=1343404 Andrus On May 28, 2012, at 10:19 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 >> release. >> >> A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at >> [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast >> your votes. >> >> Thanks, >> Andrus >> >> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ >> [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ > > > I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready for > that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7: > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/ > > > java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column in > statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL] > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source) > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source) > at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source) > at > org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57) > at > org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45) > at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131) > at > org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188) > at > org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43) > > > Is this a real test failure? > > > > Ari > > > > -- > --> > Aristedes Maniatis > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A > > >
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
On 29/05/12 8:02am, Andrus Adamchik wrote: I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your votes. Thanks, Andrus [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/ I've disabled the ci tests just now (since clearly we aren't quite ready for that), but we do have test failures also in Java 7: https://builds.apache.org/job/Cayenne-trunk/ java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to insert null into a non-nullable column in statement [ALTER TABLE PAINTING ALTER COLUMN NEWCOL2 SET NOT NULL] at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.sqlException(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.fetchResult(Unknown Source) at org.hsqldb.jdbc.jdbcStatement.execute(Unknown Source) at org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.executeSql(AbstractToDbToken.java:57) at org.apache.cayenne.merge.AbstractToDbToken.execute(AbstractToDbToken.java:45) at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.execute(MergeCase.java:131) at org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergeCase.assertTokensAndExecute(MergeCase.java:188) at org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest.test(SetAllowNullToDbTest.java:43) Is this a real test failure? Ari -- --> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1 beta 1
Looks like the update to SelectQuery just beat the tag. :-) On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > I just cloned trunk to STABLE-3.1 branch. Trunk is now the future 3.2 release. > > A 3.1 beta was assembled and can be found at [1] in its Maven form and at [2] > as source and binary assemblies. Please evaluate the release and cast your > votes. > > Thanks, > Andrus > > [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecayenne-146/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1B1/
