Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Ok, my hotel room in GMT +3 last night turned out to have no internet at all, so instead I chose to go to a reggae concert and drink beer all night :-) Tonight I am on US East Coast, and should be able to publish the release first thing Sunday morning. Andrus On Nov 8, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: BTW, if I remember correctly, Andrus is GMT+0200, which means he is 7 hours ahead of the US East Coast. That means it is unlikely he'll want to do something on a weeknight with us (6pm for us would be 1am for him). Andrus, if you want to be part of it, would sometime this weekend be good? Otherwise I guess Kevin and I could try to do it. Thanks, /dev/mrg On 11/8/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I had another deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw). Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game. Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and Andrus want to handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to hold anything up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in the IRC room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way). -- Kevin On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help. /dev/mrg On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if not, I can do it on Sunday). Andrus On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. -- Kevin -Original Message- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote So who is going to publish the release and update the site? Andrus --
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
BTW, if I remember correctly, Andrus is GMT+0200, which means he is 7 hours ahead of the US East Coast. That means it is unlikely he'll want to do something on a weeknight with us (6pm for us would be 1am for him). Andrus, if you want to be part of it, would sometime this weekend be good? Otherwise I guess Kevin and I could try to do it. Thanks, /dev/mrg On 11/8/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I had another > deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw). > > Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game. > > Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and Andrus want to > handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to hold anything > up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in the IRC > room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way). > > -- > Kevin > > > On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help. > > > > /dev/mrg > > > > > > On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the > >> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but > >> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if > >> not, I can do it on Sunday). > >> > >> Andrus > >> > >> > >> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > >> > >>> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, > >>> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kevin > >>> > >>> -Original Message- > >>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote > >>> > >>> So who is going to publish the release and update the site? > >>> > >>> Andrus > >>> > >> > >> > > -- > > >
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I had another deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw). Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game. Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and Andrus want to handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to hold anything up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in the IRC room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way). -- Kevin On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help. > > /dev/mrg > > > On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the >> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but >> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if >> not, I can do it on Sunday). >> >> Andrus >> >> >> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: >> >>> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, >>> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. >>> >>> -- >>> Kevin >>> >>> -----Original Message- >>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote >>> >>> So who is going to publish the release and update the site? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >> >> --
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help. /dev/mrg On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the > release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but > I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if > not, I can do it on Sunday). > > Andrus > > > On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > > I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, > > there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote > > > > So who is going to publish the release and update the site? > > > > Andrus > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if not, I can do it on Sunday). Andrus On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. -- Kevin -Original Message- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote So who is going to publish the release and update the site? Andrus
RE: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although, there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight. -- Kevin -Original Message- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote So who is going to publish the release and update the site? Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
So who is going to publish the release and update the site? Andrus On Nov 5, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Michael Gentry wrote: My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne (no JPA) worked fine. +1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything. Thanks, /dev/mrg On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of next week. -- Kevin -Original Message- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a vote extension. Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
FWIW: I just tried my Nested Data Context test here (had it at the office) and although it worked better than the M1 release, it still had issues (at least I think so -- I could just not understand the NDC usage). This is not enough to hold up an M2 release, but I thought I'd mention it. Thanks, /dev/mrg On Nov 5, 2007 8:59 AM, Michael Gentry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne > (no JPA) worked fine. > > +1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything. > > Thanks, > > /dev/mrg > > > > On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to > > cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of > > next week. > > > > -- > > Kevin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote > > > > > > On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > > > > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule > > > of thumb > > > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. > > > > Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a > > vote extension. > > > > Andrus > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne (no JPA) worked fine. +1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything. Thanks, /dev/mrg On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to > cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of > next week. > > -- > Kevin > > > -Original Message- > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote > > > On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > > > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule > > of thumb > > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. > > Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a > vote extension. > > Andrus > >
RE: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of next week. -- Kevin -Original Message- From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule > of thumb > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a vote extension. Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote: If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a vote extension. Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Well, for me, it can be harder to look at it during the week. I'm not even going to guess for others. I've been relatively busy lately and feel like a dead weight here. My Cayenne to-do and wish list keep getting pushed off. I'm still hopeful, though. :-) /dev/mrg On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh. I thought I was helping out by doing it on a Monday. I figured that > way everyone had time during the week to do the testing and the release > could be posted by the end of the week. Also, for a purely selfish reason, > it's easier for me to take the necessary time to build the assemblies over > the weekends. > > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. > > -- > Kevin > > > On 11/2/07 9:57 AM, "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of > > us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-) > > > > /dev/mrg > > > > > > On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results: > >> > >> -1: 0 > >> 0: 0 > >> +1: 4 (all binding) > >> > >> That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is > >> actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site. > >
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Heh. I thought I was helping out by doing it on a Monday. I figured that way everyone had time during the week to do the testing and the release could be posted by the end of the week. Also, for a purely selfish reason, it's easier for me to take the necessary time to build the assemblies over the weekends. If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri. -- Kevin On 11/2/07 9:57 AM, "Michael Gentry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of > us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-) > > /dev/mrg > > > On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results: >> >> -1: 0 >> 0: 0 >> +1: 4 (all binding) >> >> That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is >> actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site.
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-) /dev/mrg On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results: > > -1: 0 > 0: 0 > +1: 4 (all binding) > > That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is > actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site. > > -- > Kevin > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results: -1: 0 0: 0 +1: 4 (all binding) That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site. -- Kevin
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
On 31/10/2007, at 8:41 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs to be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the crappy Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted? Sorry - this has been sitting on my TODO list since July. I need to get to it rather sooner than later So M2 still has the old- style docs... Andrus OK. Let's do that for M3 then. +1 for this release. Ari --> Aristedes Maniatis phone +61 2 9660 9700 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs to be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the crappy Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted? Sorry - this has been sitting on my TODO list since July. I need to get to it rather sooner than later So M2 still has the old-style docs... Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
On 10/29/07 1:56 PM, "Kevin Menard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was tagged a couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results were all positive. I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here: http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/ I checked: * all MD5 hashes are good * PGP signing of .dmg is fine (which means that the others are probably right). KEYS file is valid. * superficially all looks with the packages * code is good since we are using svn from only about 2 weeks ago in our testing for the next release of our commercial software. It is getting a good workout. But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs to be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the crappy Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted? Ari --> Aristedes Maniatis phone +61 2 9660 9700 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
