Re: Board report

[Mike Kienenberger]

Looks good to me.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik
 wrote:
>
>> On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>
>> That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet.  Was going to
>> try tonight along with building the release.
>
>
> With the new report generation service at https://reporter.apache.org/ it was 
> a breeze :) Here is what I just committed to the board repo. Let me know if I 
> missed anything and I will change it in SVN. Will hold off the email to 
> board@ until tomorrow.
>
> Andrus
>
> Report from the Apache Cayenne project [Andrus Adamchik]
>
> ## Description:
> Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach 
> to
> object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, 
> and
> a GUI mapping/modeling tool.
>
> ## Activity:
>
> Last three months were mostly spent on preparation of 4.0.M2 release, which 
> is now
> being voted on. Fixing bugs and failing unit tests, etc.
>
> ## Issues:
>
> There are no issues requiring board attention at this time
>
> ## PMC/Committership changes:
>
>  - Currently 20 committers and 7 PMC members in the project.
>  - No new PMC members added in the last 3 months
>  - New commmitters:
> - Savva Kolbachev was added as a committer on Mon Jan 19 2015
> - Alex Kolonitsky was added as a committer on Mon Jan 19 2015
>
> ## Releases:
>
>  - Vote for 4.0.M2 release is now in progress.
>
> ## Mailing list activity:
>
>  - dev@cayenne.apache.org:
> - 113 subscribers (down -3 in the last 3 months):
> - 74 emails sent to list (178 in previous quarter)
>
>  - u...@cayenne.apache.org:
> - 240 subscribers (down -6 in the last 3 months):
> - 45 emails sent to list (85 in previous quarter)
>
>
> ## JIRA activity:
>
>  - 12 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
>  - 8 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
>

Re: Board report

[Michael Gentry]

That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet.  Was going to
try tonight along with building the release.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> Our board report is due tomorrow. Let me take a shot at preparing it in
> the next couple of hours.
>
> Andrus

Re: Board report

[Andrus Adamchik]

> On Mar 10, 2015, at 6:54 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> 
> That's been on my to-do list, but I haven't gotten to it yet.  Was going to
> try tonight along with building the release.


With the new report generation service at https://reporter.apache.org/ it was a 
breeze :) Here is what I just committed to the board repo. Let me know if I 
missed anything and I will change it in SVN. Will hold off the email to board@ 
until tomorrow.

Andrus

Report from the Apache Cayenne project [Andrus Adamchik]

## Description: 
Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct approach to 
object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote persistence services, 
and 
a GUI mapping/modeling tool.
   
## Activity: 
 
Last three months were mostly spent on preparation of 4.0.M2 release, which is 
now
being voted on. Fixing bugs and failing unit tests, etc.
   
## Issues: 
 
There are no issues requiring board attention at this time
   
## PMC/Committership changes: 
   
 - Currently 20 committers and 7 PMC members in the project. 
 - No new PMC members added in the last 3 months 
 - New commmitters: 
- Savva Kolbachev was added as a committer on Mon Jan 19 2015 
- Alex Kolonitsky was added as a committer on Mon Jan 19 2015 
   
## Releases: 
   
 - Vote for 4.0.M2 release is now in progress. 
   
## Mailing list activity: 
   
 - dev@cayenne.apache.org:  
- 113 subscribers (down -3 in the last 3 months): 
- 74 emails sent to list (178 in previous quarter) 
   
 - u...@cayenne.apache.org:  
- 240 subscribers (down -6 in the last 3 months): 
- 45 emails sent to list (85 in previous quarter) 
   
   
## JIRA activity: 
   
 - 12 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months 
 - 8 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months 
   

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

I was going to email it to the board tonight.

On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> Any other changes?  We really need to get this out.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
> 
>> Here is my revision:
>> 
>> https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions
>> 
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>> 
>>> https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
>>> 
>>> Leave comments if you care.  Or reply here, etc.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 Gist is pretty great.  I'll create them there.  Good idea.
 
 mrg
 
 
 
 On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> and...@objectstyle.org>
 wrote:
 
> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
> https://gist.github.com/ :)
> 
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> wrote:
>> I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get
>> the
>> report out soon.  :-)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis >> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
> writable -
>>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed
>> other
>>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>>> 
>>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all,
>> and
> we
>>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
> will
>>> actually find them.
>>> 
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
> 
> 
 
>> 
>> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Any other changes?  We really need to get this out.

Thanks,

mrg


On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> Here is my revision:
>
> https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions
>
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>
> > https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
> >
> > Leave comments if you care.  Or reply here, etc.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Gist is pretty great.  I'll create them there.  Good idea.
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
> >>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
>  I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get
> the
>  report out soon.  :-)
> 
> 
> 
>  On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  >
>  wrote:
> 
> > On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
> >>> writable -
> > that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed
> other
> > folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >
> > Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all,
> and
> >>> we
> > don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
> >>> will
> > actually find them.
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > --
> > -->
> > Aristedes Maniatis
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

Here is my revision:

https://gist.github.com/andrus/5419f195af37f4cf20a1/revisions

On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a
> 
> Leave comments if you care.  Or reply here, etc.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> 
>> Gist is pretty great.  I'll create them there.  Good idea.
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
>>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
 I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get the
 report out soon.  :-)
 
 
 
 On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
 wrote:
 
> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
>>> writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> 
> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
>>> we
> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
>>> will
> actually find them.
> 
> Ari
> 
> 
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

https://gist.github.com/mrg/fcf9b661bc88f9c9c94a

Leave comments if you care.  Or reply here, etc.

Thanks,

mrg



On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Michael Gentry 
wrote:

> Gist is pretty great.  I'll create them there.  Good idea.
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
>
>> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
>> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>> > I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get the
>> > report out soon.  :-)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> >>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is
>> writable -
>> >> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
>> >> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>> >>
>> >> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
>> we
>> >> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
>> will
>> >> actually find them.
>> >>
>> >> Ari
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -->
>> >> Aristedes Maniatis
>> >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Gist is pretty great.  I'll create them there.  Good idea.

mrg



On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist -
> https://gist.github.com/ :)
>
> On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> > I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get the
> > report out soon.  :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable
> -
> >> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> >> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >>
> >> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and
> we
> >> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one
> will
> >> actually find them.
> >>
> >> Ari
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -->
> >> Aristedes Maniatis
> >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

I'll do some bikeshedding here - we can also use Gist - 
https://gist.github.com/ :)

On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get the
> report out soon.  :-)
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
>> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
>> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>> 
>> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we
>> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will
>> actually find them.
>> 
>> Ari
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

I'm not beholden to a specific location.  I just know we need to get the
report out soon.  :-)



On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
wrote:

> On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>
> Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we
> don't have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will
> actually find them.
>
> Ari
>
>
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 4/09/2014 4:45am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - 
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other 
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.

Why not put them in the website folder? They are public after all, and we don't 
have to link to them from other parts of our website, so no one will actually 
find them.

Ari


-- 
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

I'm down with a GD, too.


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission
> :)
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah :-/
> >
> > ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m
> "board reports"
> > svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (
> http://svn.apache.org)
> >
> > I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> >
> > I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for
> reports. Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place
> something there that is not a board report in the future.
> >
> > For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and
> this list.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Well, according to our website:
> >>
> >> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> >> mode"
> >>
> >> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
> >>
> >> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> >> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> >> MKACTIVITY request for
> >> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
> >>
> >>
> >> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik  >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Mike,
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> >>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
> >>>
> >>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> >>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> >>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main”
> folder
> >>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
> >>>
> >>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
> >>>
> >>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> >>> it.  It
>  is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> 
>  I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
>  going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
>  objects.
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  mrg
> 
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry <
> mgen...@masslight.net>
>  wrote:
> 
> > OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>> and...@objectstyle.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>
> >> I’d say go for it.
> >>
> >> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry 
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> >> reports?  If
> >>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >> and...@objectstyle.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> >>> sure
> >> we
>  do. But I won’t object to it either.
> 
>  Andrus
> 
> 
>  On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis <
> a...@maniatis.org>
> >> wrote:
> 
> > Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some
> sense.
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s
> plan
> >>> to
>  write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> >> repo for
>  it?)
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgen...@masslight.net
> 
>  wrote:
> >>
> >>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> >> board
>  report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks
> >>> pretty
>  awful.
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>  and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
> >>> will
>  submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>
> >>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and
> check
>  reports to SVN as text files. The wiki r

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Well, here is the current draft (which is also available in Git until I can
delete it) in Markdown format:

# Apache Cayenne Board Report - September 2014

Apache Cayenne is a Java persistence framework. It takes a distinct
approach to object persistence and provides an ORM runtime, remote
persistence services, and a GUI mapping/modeling tool.

## Project Status

* Preparations are underway for Cayenne 3.1 Final (Release Candidate 1 was
released on Feb 18).
* New feature development continues for Cayenne 3.2.
* Git migration has completed (for 3.2 only, previous revisions remain in
Subversion). As a result of the migration, we have received pull requests
via GitHub which opens up new avenues for developers to contribute.
* Confluence "CAY" space deleted since it was not used.

## Community

* Mailing list activity is about average on developer and user lists.
* The last PMC member was added in December 2012.
* The last committer was added in May 2012.




On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> Yeah :-/
>
> ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m
> "board reports"
> svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden (
> http://svn.apache.org)
>
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable -
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
>
> I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports.
> Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something
> there that is not a board report in the future.
>
> For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and
> this list.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>
> > Well, according to our website:
> >
> > "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> > mode"
> >
> > And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
> >
> > svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> > svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> > MKACTIVITY request for
> > '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
> >
> >
> > So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Mike,
> >>
> >> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> >> top-level of SVN, not Git.
> >>
> >> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> >> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> >> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> >> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main”
> folder
> >> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
> >>
> >> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> >> it.  It
> >>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> >>>
> >>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> >>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> >>> objects.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
> 
> 
>  On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >> and...@objectstyle.org>
>  wrote:
> 
> >> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >
> > I’d say go for it.
> >
> > On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry 
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> > reports?  If
> >> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> mrg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> > and...@objectstyle.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> >> sure
> > we
> >>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis  >
> > wrote:
> >>>
>  Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> 
>  Ari
> 
> 
>  On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> > Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
> >> to
> >>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> > repo for
> >>> it?)
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> > On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry <
> mgen...@masslight.net
> >>>
> >>> wrote:
> >
> >> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about 

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

FWIW, we can even use GoogleDocs and destroy them after report submission :)

On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik  wrote:

> Yeah :-/
> 
> ~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board 
> reports"
> svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden 
> (http://svn.apache.org)
> 
> I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - 
> that's our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other 
> folders except for main are available for writing. I was wrong.
> 
> I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. 
> Maybe we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there 
> that is not a board report in the future.
> 
> For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this 
> list.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> 
>> Well, according to our website:
>> 
>> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
>> mode"
>> 
>> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
>> 
>> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
>> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
>> MKACTIVITY request for
>> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
>> 
>> 
>> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mike,
>>> 
>>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
>>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>>> 
>>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
>>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
>>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
>>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
>>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>>> 
>>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>>> 
>>> What do you think?
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>> 
 Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
>>> it.  It
 is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
 
 I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
 going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
 objects.
 
 Thanks,
 
 mrg
 
 
 
 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry 
 wrote:
 
> OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>> and...@objectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> 
>>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>> 
>> I’d say go for it.
>> 
>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>> reports?  If
>>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> and...@objectstyle.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
>>> sure
>> we
 do. But I won’t object to it either.
 
 Andrus
 
 
 On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
>> wrote:
 
> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> 
> Ari
> 
> 
> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
>>> to
 write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>> repo for
 it?)
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry >>> 
 wrote:
>> 
>>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>> board
 report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks
>>> pretty
 awful.
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
 and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
>>> will
 submit the report in a few minutes.
>>> 
>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
 reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
>>> there’s
 really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry >>> 
 wrote:
>>> 
 Please review/comment:
 
 
 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
 
 My biggest question

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

Yeah :-/

~: svn mkdir http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/board-reports -m "board 
reports"
svn: E175013: POST of '/repos/asf/!svn/me': 403 Forbidden 
(http://svn.apache.org)

I know that http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/site/ is writable - that's 
our website, and CMS doesn't even work with Git. I assumed other folders except 
for main are available for writing. I was wrong.

I will probably just ask Infra to create a separate Git repo for reports. Maybe 
we call it "cayenne-pmc" just in case we need to place something there that is 
not a board report in the future.

For now I see no problem if we collaborate on the report using email and this 
list.

Andrus


On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:24 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> Well, according to our website:
> 
> "For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
> mode"
> 
> And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:
> 
> svn: Commit failed (details follow):
> svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
> MKACTIVITY request for
> '/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'
> 
> 
> So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
> 
>> Mike,
>> 
>> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
>> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>> 
>> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
>> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
>> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
>> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
>> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>> 
>> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>> 
>> What do you think?
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>> 
>>> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
>> it.  It
>>> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
>>> 
>>> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
>>> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
>>> objects.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
 OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
 
 
 On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> and...@objectstyle.org>
 wrote:
 
>> how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> 
> I’d say go for it.
> 
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> reports?  If
>> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
>> sure
> we
>>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
> wrote:
>>> 
 Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
 
 Ari
 
 
 On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
>> to
>>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> repo for
>>> it?)
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry >> 
>>> wrote:
> 
>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> board
>>> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks
>> pretty
>>> awful.
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
>> will
>>> submit the report in a few minutes.
>> 
>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
>> there’s
>>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry >> 
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Please review/comment:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>> 
>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> mrg
>> 
>> 
> 
 
 --
 -->
 Aristedes Maniatis
 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Well, according to our website:

"For archival purposes SVN repository is still available in a read-only
mode"

And when I just tried to add the reports to SVN, I received:

svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to
MKACTIVITY request for
'/repos/asf/!svn/act/be340dff-489e-479c-9c44-4367a994a635'


So, I'm guessing SVN really is read-only?

mrg


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> Mike,
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the
> top-level of SVN, not Git.
>
> With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN
> tree that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site
> pages, Git is normally split into smaller repos. So
> https://github.com/apache/cayenne corresponds to the former “main” folder
> under http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ .
>
> My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Andrus
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>
> > Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review
> it.  It
> > is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> >
> > I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> > going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> > objects.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
>  how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >>>
> >>> I’d say go for it.
> >>>
> >>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
> >>> reports?  If
>  not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  mrg
> 
> 
> 
>  On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >>> and...@objectstyle.org>
>  wrote:
> 
> > If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not
> sure
> >>> we
> > do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
> >>> wrote:
> >
> >> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >>
> >> Ari
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan
> to
> > write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
> >>> repo for
> > it?)
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry  >
> > wrote:
> >>>
>  Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
> >>> board
> > report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks
> pretty
> > awful.
> 
>  mrg
> 
> 
>  On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> > and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>  Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and
> will
> > submit the report in a few minutes.
> 
>  Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> > reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and
> there’s
> > really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> 
> 
> 
>  On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  >
> > wrote:
> 
> > Please review/comment:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >
> > My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> 
> 
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -->
> >> Aristedes Maniatis
> >> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

Mike, 

Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought you were going to put it at the top-level 
of SVN, not Git. 

With Git we have a different repository model. Instead of one huge SVN tree 
that contains everything from the source code to sandbox to site pages, Git is 
normally split into smaller repos. So https://github.com/apache/cayenne 
corresponds to the former “main” folder under 
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cayenne/ . 

My suggestion would be to move board-reports to SVN. 

What do you think?

Andrus

On Sep 3, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review it.  It
> is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.
> 
> I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
> going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
> objects.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> 
>> OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
>> wrote:
>> 
 how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>> 
>>> I’d say go for it.
>>> 
>>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>> 
 Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>>> reports?  If
 not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
 
 Thanks,
 
 mrg
 
 
 
 On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>>> and...@objectstyle.org>
 wrote:
 
> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
>>> we
> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
>>> wrote:
> 
>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>> 
>> Ari
>> 
>> 
>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>>> repo for
> it?)
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
>>> 
 Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>>> board
> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
> awful.
 
 mrg
 
 
 On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
 Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> submit the report in a few minutes.
 
 Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
 
 
 
 On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
 
> Please review/comment:
> 
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> 
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
 
 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> 
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Put the draft at board-reports/2014-09.md if anyone wants to review it.  It
is in Markdown format, so it should render well on GitHub, too.

I also added the previous two (March and June), but wasn't planning on
going back through my emails to add anything before 2014 unless anyone
objects.

Thanks,

mrg



On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Michael Gentry 
wrote:

> OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
>
>> > how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>>
>> I’d say go for it.
>>
>> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>
>> > Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board
>> reports?  If
>> > not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > mrg
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> and...@objectstyle.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
>> we
>> >> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>> >>
>> >> Andrus
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ari
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>  Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
>> >> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git
>> repo for
>> >> it?)
>> 
>>  Andrus
>> 
>>  On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> >> wrote:
>> 
>> > Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous
>> board
>> >> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
>> >> awful.
>> >
>> > mrg
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> >> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> > Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
>> >> submit the report in a few minutes.
>> >
>> > Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>> >> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
>> >> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Please review/comment:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>> >>
>> >> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> mrg
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> -->
>> >>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> >>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

OK, I'll start on September's there.  Thanks!


On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> > how about "board-reports" at the top level?
>
> I’d say go for it.
>
> On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>
> > Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports?
> If
> > not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik  >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure
> we
> >> do. But I won’t object to it either.
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >>>
> >>> Ari
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>  Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
> >> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo
> for
> >> it?)
> 
>  Andrus
> 
>  On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry 
> >> wrote:
> 
> > Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
> >> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
> >> awful.
> >
> > mrg
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> >> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> > Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> >> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >
> > Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> >> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
> >> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry 
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> Please review/comment:
> >>
> >>
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >>
> >> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> mrg
> >
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> -->
> >>> Aristedes Maniatis
> >>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

> how about "board-reports" at the top level?

I’d say go for it.

On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports?  If
> not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
> 
>> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we
>> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>> 
>>> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
>>> 
>>> Ari
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
 Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
>> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for
>> it?)
 
 Andrus
 
 On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> wrote:
 
> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
>> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
>> awful.
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
>> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
>> submit the report in a few minutes.
> 
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
>> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
>> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry 
>> wrote:
> 
>> Please review/comment:
>> 
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>> 
>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
> 
> 
 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Was there a specific location in the repo created to put board reports?  If
not, how about "board-reports" at the top level?

Thanks,

mrg



On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we
> do. But I won’t object to it either.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>
> > Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> >
> > Ari
> >
> >
> > On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to
> write the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for
> it?)
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
> awful.
> >>>
> >>> mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> submit the report in a few minutes.
> >>>
> >>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check
> reports to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s
> really no reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  Please review/comment:
> 
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> 
>  My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> 
>  Thanks,
> 
>  mrg
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > -->
> > Aristedes Maniatis
> > GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> >
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

If we want it to be published on the website - then yes. I am not sure we do. 
But I won’t object to it either.

Andrus


On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:

> Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.
> 
> Ari
> 
> 
> On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write 
>> the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)
>> 
>> Andrus
>> 
>> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>> 
>>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board 
>>> report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty 
>>> awful.
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik  
>>> wrote:
>>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit 
>>> the report in a few minutes.
>>> 
>>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports 
>>> to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no 
>>> reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>> 
 Please review/comment:
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
 
 My biggest question was about the Git migration.
 
 Thanks,
 
 mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> 

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

Should it be in svn as part of our website? That makes some sense.

Ari


On 16/06/2014 4:57pm, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write 
> the next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> 
>> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report 
>> and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful.
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik  
>> wrote:
>> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit 
>> the report in a few minutes.
>>
>> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to 
>> SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no 
>> reason to work on fixing it.Andrus
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>>
>>> Please review/comment:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>>
>>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>
>>
> 

-- 
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

Cool. I’ll see what we need to do to pull it down. And let’s plan to write the 
next report in SVN (or maybe we should request a new Git repo for it?)

Andrus

On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:

> Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board report 
> and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty awful.
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik  
> wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit 
> the report in a few minutes.
> 
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to 
> SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason 
> to work on fixing it.Andrus
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> 
>> Please review/comment:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>> 
>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
> 
> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Welcome Andrus.  We talked about ditching the Wiki the previous board
report and I'm OK with that.  As your screenshot shows, it looks pretty
awful.

mrg


On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Andrus Adamchik 
wrote:

> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will
> submit the report in a few minutes.
>
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports
> to SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no
> reason to work on fixing it.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>
> Please review/comment:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

I agree. Is there any content in the wiki we care about copying over? I can't 
say I've logged into it for about 4 years.

Ari


On 13/06/2014 3:07am, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Thanks Mike for preparing the report. I edited the Git note and will submit 
> the report in a few minutes.
> 
> Going forward, I think we should do away with our wiki, and check reports to 
> SVN as text files. The wiki rendering is broken, and there’s really no reason 
> to work on fixing it.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Jun 9, 2014, at 6:20 PM, Michael Gentry  > wrote:
> 
>> Please review/comment:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
>>
>> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
> 

-- 
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

That's what I thought, but wasn't certain.  I checked out the 3.2 code via
Git, but couldn't build it and thought maybe it wasn't quite ready yet.

Thanks,

mrg



On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Aristedes Maniatis 
wrote:

> Yes, the git migration is completely done now.
>
> Ari
>
> On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote:
> > Please review/comment:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> >
> > My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > mrg
> >
>
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

Yes, the git migration is completely done now.

Ari

On 10/06/2014 1:20am, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Please review/comment:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2014
> 
> My biggest question was about the Git migration.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 

-- 
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

I don’t think SonarQube discussion is that relevant for the board. 

Here are a few of my additions:

* re: git migration - everyone involved dropped the ball on this, but really 
hope we pick it up somehow. 
* we have a bunch of patches from Oleg Artyukevich (pending review), who is not 
(yet) a committer.

I guess I am going to merge that and submit the report.

Thanks,
Andrus

P.S. Looking at our wiki, perhaps we should stop using it after all, and switch 
to SVN for reports :) In any event I always have to reformat the text to commit 
it to the Board SVN. 


On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:57 PM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2014
> 
> Seems a bit sparse.  Should we include things like discussing SonarQube,
> etc?
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> 
>> I'll try to get something today.  Was nursing a migraine yesterday and
>> avoided e-mail/etc.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> So I guess we have this week to finalize the board report. I was sick all
>>> last week, so haven't replied to Mike's wiki messages. I don't think we
>>> even need to use CMS for the board reports. We can just store them as
>>> unpublished text files in SVN. This is just for our collaboration after all.
>>> 
>>> Mike, let me know if you have time to work on this. Otherwise I might
>>> just write something up in the next few days and submit to the board.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>> 
>> 
>> 

Re: Board report?

[Michael Gentry]

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2014

Seems a bit sparse.  Should we include things like discussing SonarQube,
etc?


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> I'll try to get something today.  Was nursing a migraine yesterday and
> avoided e-mail/etc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik 
> wrote:
>
>> So I guess we have this week to finalize the board report. I was sick all
>> last week, so haven't replied to Mike's wiki messages. I don't think we
>> even need to use CMS for the board reports. We can just store them as
>> unpublished text files in SVN. This is just for our collaboration after all.
>>
>> Mike, let me know if you have time to work on this. Otherwise I might
>> just write something up in the next few days and submit to the board.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>
>
>

Re: Board report?

[Michael Gentry]

I'll try to get something today.  Was nursing a migraine yesterday and
avoided e-mail/etc.

Thanks,

mrg



On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> So I guess we have this week to finalize the board report. I was sick all
> last week, so haven't replied to Mike's wiki messages. I don't think we
> even need to use CMS for the board reports. We can just store them as
> unpublished text files in SVN. This is just for our collaboration after all.
>
> Mike, let me know if you have time to work on this. Otherwise I might just
> write something up in the next few days and submit to the board.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

Thanks Michael. I see that now the community section also has all the needed 
info (at least I can't think of anything else). I am going to submit it now.

Andrus

On Mar 8, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> I forgot to link it.  Fixed that problem and updated based on some of
> Andrus' 3.1M2 announcement details:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2011
> 
> The community section (at a minimum) needs updated before submission.
> Please take a look.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
>> I put a draft of the board report on the wiki.
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

I forgot to link it.  Fixed that problem and updated based on some of
Andrus' 3.1M2 announcement details:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2011

The community section (at a minimum) needs updated before submission.
Please take a look.

Thanks,

mrg


On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> I put a draft of the board report on the wiki.
>
> mrg
>

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

I put a draft of the board report on the wiki.

mrg

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

With my +1 we have 3 binding votes. I will send a separate email closing the 
vote and will try to push the artifacts ASAP.

Andrus

On Mar 4, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> It's about time for the March 2011 Board Report.  If anyone else can
> look at the 3.1M2 release Andrus put together and vote on it, I think
> that would be a nice addition to get into the report.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 

Re: Board Report

[Michael Gentry]

Thanks Andrus!

mrg


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 3:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik  wrote:
> We need to submit the report now. So I am going to fill it in and send to the 
> board.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>> The raw source is still in a simple format that will paste nicely into an 
>> email.
>>
>> I'll see if I can look at knocking off the 2 undone things on the list 
>> there, but if I don't get to them before you send the report, could you 
>> please create a followup report for the next period and put the undone 
>> things in there ready for reporting to the board in the next report.
>>
>> Ari
>>
>> On 10/12/10 2:16 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was about to start the December 2010 Board Report.  There is already
>>> a wiki page for it (a template), but it is no longer the simple format
>>> that we used before.  I didn't follow the branding conversation that
>>> well.  Do we leave the web site portion alone and update
>>> development/community?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>
>> --
>> -->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
>
>

Re: Board Report

[Andrus Adamchik]

We need to submit the report now. So I am going to fill it in and send to the 
board.

Andrus

On Dec 10, 2010, at 1:39 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

> The raw source is still in a simple format that will paste nicely into an 
> email.
> 
> I'll see if I can look at knocking off the 2 undone things on the list there, 
> but if I don't get to them before you send the report, could you please 
> create a followup report for the next period and put the undone things in 
> there ready for reporting to the board in the next report.
> 
> Ari
> 
> On 10/12/10 2:16 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was about to start the December 2010 Board Report.  There is already
>> a wiki page for it (a template), but it is no longer the simple format
>> that we used before.  I didn't follow the branding conversation that
>> well.  Do we leave the web site portion alone and update
>> development/community?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
> 
> -- 
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
> 

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

The raw source is still in a simple format that will paste nicely into an email.

I'll see if I can look at knocking off the 2 undone things on the list there, 
but if I don't get to them before you send the report, could you please create 
a followup report for the next period and put the undone things in there ready 
for reporting to the board in the next report.

Ari

On 10/12/10 2:16 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

Hi,

I was about to start the December 2010 Board Report.  There is already
a wiki page for it (a template), but it is no longer the simple format
that we used before.  I didn't follow the branding conversation that
well.  Do we leave the web site portion alone and update
development/community?

Thanks,

mrg


--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Andrus Adamchik]

I don't mind adding full names. Just one comment - board reports are intended 
for PMC  to board communication. All other uses are coincidental, and we could 
care less about them.

Andrus

On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> True, but we maintain the board reports on the wiki/web site and it is
> open for everyone to see, not just the Apache Board.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik  
> wrote:
>> All board members know who they are :-)
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>> 
>>> Looks pretty good to me, but perhaps we should include Roy's and
>>> Sally's last name?
>>> 
>>> mrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  
>>> wrote:
 With one small revision I added just now (in case the board want to review
 our voting and release rules), I'm +1.
 
 Ari
 
 On 14/09/10 6:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> 
> Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.
> 
> Andrus
> 
> On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> 
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> mrg
>> 
> 
 
 --
 -->
 Aristedes Maniatis
 GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Michael Gentry]

True, but we maintain the board reports on the wiki/web site and it is
open for everyone to see, not just the Apache Board.

Thanks,

mrg


On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Andrus Adamchik  wrote:
> All board members know who they are :-)
>
> On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> Looks pretty good to me, but perhaps we should include Roy's and
>> Sally's last name?
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  
>> wrote:
>>> With one small revision I added just now (in case the board want to review
>>> our voting and release rules), I'm +1.
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>> On 14/09/10 6:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

 Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.

 Andrus

 On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>

>>>
>>> --
>>> -->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Andrus Adamchik]

All board members know who they are :-)

On Sep 14, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> Looks pretty good to me, but perhaps we should include Roy's and
> Sally's last name?
> 
> mrg
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
>> With one small revision I added just now (in case the board want to review
>> our voting and release rules), I'm +1.
>> 
>> Ari
>> 
>> On 14/09/10 6:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.
>>> 
>>> Andrus
>>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>> 
 
 https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010
 
 Thanks,
 
 mrg
 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>> 
> 

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Michael Gentry]

Looks pretty good to me, but perhaps we should include Roy's and
Sally's last name?

mrg


On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Aristedes Maniatis  wrote:
> With one small revision I added just now (in case the board want to review
> our voting and release rules), I'm +1.
>
> Ari
>
> On 14/09/10 6:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>> Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>> On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> mrg
>>>
>>
>
> --
> -->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Aristedes Maniatis]

With one small revision I added just now (in case the board want to review our 
voting and release rules), I'm +1.

Ari

On 14/09/10 6:53 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.

Andrus

On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010

Thanks,

mrg





--
-->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Andrus Adamchik]

Just updated it with some more details. I think it is ready to go now.

Andrus

On Sep 4, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2010
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> mrg
> 

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Andrus Adamchik]

Hi Mike,

Looks good to me. Thanks for writing the report.

Andrus

On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:26 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

If no one has further updates to this, I'll try to send it out this  
evening.


Thanks!


On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Michael Gentry  
 wrote:

Thanks, Mike!

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Kienenberger  
 wrote:

Added items about Andrew Lindesay and vertical inheritance.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Michael Gentry >wrote:



I stubbed this out:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2010

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Michael Gentry]

If no one has further updates to this, I'll try to send it out this evening.

Thanks!


On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Michael Gentry  wrote:
> Thanks, Mike!
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Kienenberger  wrote:
>> Added items about Andrew Lindesay and vertical inheritance.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>>
>>> I stubbed this out:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2010
>>>
>>
>

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Michael Gentry]

Thanks, Mike!

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Mike Kienenberger  wrote:
> Added items about Andrew Lindesay and vertical inheritance.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> I stubbed this out:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2010
>>
>

Re: Board Report -- Please Review

[Mike Kienenberger]

Added items about Andrew Lindesay and vertical inheritance.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

> I stubbed this out:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2010
>

Re: Board report draft

[Michael Gentry]

I just noticed that.  You beat me to it.  Looks good to me.


On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Andrus Adamchik
 wrote:
> FYI:
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+September+2009
>
> Pleas let me know if I missed anything important.
>
> Andrus
>

Re: Board Report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 5/6/09 11:41 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:

I created a draft for the June report.

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+June+2009

mrg



Great. I added a bit more...


Ari

Re: Board Report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:


I added something. What do you think?


Thanks!


Do we need to vote on this report amongst the PMC?


No, we don't. At least as long as there is a consensus. This is not a  
release after all.


Andrus



Ari


On 12/03/2008, at 5:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Ah, one more request that I got:

For the coming board report, the board and legal committee would  
much
appreciate your project reviewing the crypto export policy spelled  
out
at http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html to determine that the  
project
either either no encryption considerations, or if notices must be  
(or had
been) sent to the BIS and NSA, they have been documented at the  
official

location http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ for all encryption
elements within the oversite of this PMC.  Adding a status item on  
the
board report will help the legal committee to ensure this  
oversight has

been applied across the foundation.


I guess we don't have any crypto..?

Andrus


On Mar 11, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Ok, I guess there are no more changes to that. I going to submit  
the report on Wiki to the board.


Andrus


On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:


Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2008

I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that  
about as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A














-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Aristedes Maniatis]

I added something. What do you think?

Do we need to vote on this report amongst the PMC?

Ari


On 12/03/2008, at 5:48 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Ah, one more request that I got:


For the coming board report, the board and legal committee would much
appreciate your project reviewing the crypto export policy spelled  
out
at http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html to determine that the  
project
either either no encryption considerations, or if notices must be  
(or had
been) sent to the BIS and NSA, they have been documented at the  
official

location http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ for all encryption
elements within the oversite of this PMC.  Adding a status item on  
the
board report will help the legal committee to ensure this oversight  
has

been applied across the foundation.


I guess we don't have any crypto..?

Andrus


On Mar 11, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Ok, I guess there are no more changes to that. I going to submit  
the report on Wiki to the board.


Andrus


On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:


Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2008

I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that  
about as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A














-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

Ah, one more request that I got:


For the coming board report, the board and legal committee would much
appreciate your project reviewing the crypto export policy spelled out
at http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html to determine that the project
either either no encryption considerations, or if notices must be  
(or had
been) sent to the BIS and NSA, they have been documented at the  
official

location http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ for all encryption
elements within the oversite of this PMC.  Adding a status item on the
board report will help the legal committee to ensure this oversight  
has

been applied across the foundation.


I guess we don't have any crypto..?

Andrus


On Mar 11, 2008, at 7:31 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Ok, I guess there are no more changes to that. I going to submit the  
report on Wiki to the board.


Andrus


On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:


Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March 
+2008


I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that  
about as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

Ok, I guess there are no more changes to that. I going to submit the  
report on Wiki to the board.


Andrus


On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:


Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2008

I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that  
about as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

That's ok, board report doesn't have to be exciting :-)

Andrus

On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2008

I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that  
about as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Aristedes Maniatis]

Please edit:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+March+2008

I feel we should be sharing more exciting information, but that about  
as exciting as I could make it :-)


Ari


On 05/03/2008, at 6:01 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:


Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg









-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board Report?

[Andrus Adamchik]

Yes

On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:54 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Is there a board report for March 2008 we need to put together?

Thanks,

/dev/mrg

Re: Board report

[Andrus Adamchik]

added this change.

On Dec 13, 2007, at 2:50 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:


Looks good to me, but how about changing:

Switched Cayenne development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5  
setup.


to:

Switched Cayenne 3.0 development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5
setup after a poll on the user list revealed overwhelming community
acceptance of requiring Java 1.5 for Cayenne 3.0.

???

I just don't want it to sound like an arbitrary decision.

Thanks,

/dev/mrg

Re: Board report

[Michael Gentry]

Looks good to me, but how about changing:

Switched Cayenne development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5 setup.

to:

Switched Cayenne 3.0 development to Java 1.5 from a mixed Java 1.4/1.5
setup after a poll on the user list revealed overwhelming community
acceptance of requiring Java 1.5 for Cayenne 3.0.

???

I just don't want it to sound like an arbitrary decision.

Thanks,

/dev/mrg

Re: Board report

[Kevin Menard]

Looks good to me.

-- 
Kevin


On 12/12/07 4:34 AM, "Andrus Adamchik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just posted a board report draft. We'll need to submit it in a few
> days. Please comment if you think we need to add/change anything:
> 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2007
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrus

Re: Board report

[Andrus Adamchik]

+1 on both points. How could I forget about JDK 1.5 :-)

I'll update the report.

Andrus


On Dec 12, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:



On 12/12/2007, at 8:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Just posted a board report draft. We'll need to submit it in a few  
days. Please comment if you think we need to add/change anything:


http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2007


Looks fine. If anything, I'd say mailing list activity is above  
average. Also is it worth noting the move to JDK15 which might be  
interesting for the board to see as an overview?


Ari



-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

Re: Board report

[Aristedes Maniatis]

On 12/12/2007, at 8:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

Just posted a board report draft. We'll need to submit it in a few  
days. Please comment if you think we need to add/change anything:


http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAY/Board+Report+December+2007


Looks fine. If anything, I'd say mailing list activity is above  
average. Also is it worth noting the move to JDK15 which might be  
interesting for the board to see as an overview?


Ari



-->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001   fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A