Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
Thanks Florian. I'd have volunteered but for the fact that I have too many other things on my plate and that I am also going to be travelling soon. Florent On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Florian Müller wrote: > Nobody volunteered, yet. > If there are no objections, I'll run the release this time. > > - Florian > > > We need a release manager for the OpenCMIS 1.0 release. >> Are there any volunteers? >> >> - Florian >> >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? >>> >>> Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. >>> Would that be ok? >>> What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? >>> >>> >>> - Florian >>> >> -- Florent Guillaume, Director of R&D, Nuxeo Open Source, Java EE based, Enterprise Content Management (ECM) http://www.nuxeo.com http://www.nuxeo.org +33 1 40 33 79 87
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
Nobody volunteered, yet. If there are no objections, I'll run the release this time. - Florian We need a release manager for the OpenCMIS 1.0 release. Are there any volunteers? - Florian Hi all, I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. Would that be ok? What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? - Florian
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
We need a release manager for the OpenCMIS 1.0 release. Are there any volunteers? - Florian Hi all, I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. Would that be ok? What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? - Florian
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
Fair enough, I had a feeling that would be the answer but thought it was worth asking ;-) On 20/07/2016 08:30, "Florian Müller" wrote: I have to agree. We here are just phasing out Java 6. We would need Java 7 support probably for a few more years. - Florian > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Gavin Cornwell wrote: >> If we’re contemplating a move from Java 6 why not move straight to 8? > > What new features do we get if we move to 8 rather than 7? How many > users would we loose because their locked-down "enterprise" work > environments are stuck with 7? (Or worse, earlier...) > > (IIRC Alfresco 4.x is supported on Java 7, only 5.x bumped it to Java > 8, so we'd potentially loose some Alfresco users. Not sure about other > common platforms that OpenCMIS gets used with, but based on my work on > Tika and POI there's a surprising number of folks out there stuck on > old JRE versions) > > Nick
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
There seems to be consensus on at least moving to Java 7. I've done the change in the pom.xml. - Florian +1 for a 1.0 release and removing deprecated methods. If we’re contemplating a move from Java 6 why not move straight to 8? Gavin On 18/07/2016 19:16, "Jeff Potts" wrote: +1 Jeff On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jay Brown wrote: +1 Jay Brown Senior Engineer, ECM Development IBM Software Group [image: Inactive hide details for Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 AM---+1 --]Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 AM---+1 -- From: Gabriele Columbro To: [email protected] Date: 07/18/2016 09:19 AM Subject: Re: OpenCMIS 1.0 -- +1 -- Gabriele Columbro Executive Director, Symphony Software Foundation > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > > Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. Would that be ok? > What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > > - Florian
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
I have to agree. We here are just phasing out Java 6. We would need Java 7 support probably for a few more years. - Florian On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Gavin Cornwell wrote: If we’re contemplating a move from Java 6 why not move straight to 8? What new features do we get if we move to 8 rather than 7? How many users would we loose because their locked-down "enterprise" work environments are stuck with 7? (Or worse, earlier...) (IIRC Alfresco 4.x is supported on Java 7, only 5.x bumped it to Java 8, so we'd potentially loose some Alfresco users. Not sure about other common platforms that OpenCMIS gets used with, but based on my work on Tika and POI there's a surprising number of folks out there stuck on old JRE versions) Nick
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Gavin Cornwell wrote: If we’re contemplating a move from Java 6 why not move straight to 8? What new features do we get if we move to 8 rather than 7? How many users would we loose because their locked-down "enterprise" work environments are stuck with 7? (Or worse, earlier...) (IIRC Alfresco 4.x is supported on Java 7, only 5.x bumped it to Java 8, so we'd potentially loose some Alfresco users. Not sure about other common platforms that OpenCMIS gets used with, but based on my work on Tika and POI there's a surprising number of folks out there stuck on old JRE versions) Nick
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
+1 for a 1.0 release and removing deprecated methods. If we’re contemplating a move from Java 6 why not move straight to 8? Gavin On 18/07/2016 19:16, "Jeff Potts" wrote: +1 Jeff On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jay Brown wrote: > +1 > > > Jay Brown > Senior Engineer, ECM Development > IBM Software Group > > [image: Inactive hide details for Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 > AM---+1 --]Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 AM---+1 -- > > From: Gabriele Columbro > To: [email protected] > Date: 07/18/2016 09:19 AM > Subject: Re: OpenCMIS 1.0 > -- > > > > +1 > > -- > Gabriele Columbro > Executive Director, Symphony Software Foundation > > > > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > > > > Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. > Would that be ok? > > What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > > > > > - Florian > > > > >
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
+1 Jeff On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jay Brown wrote: > +1 > > > Jay Brown > Senior Engineer, ECM Development > IBM Software Group > > [image: Inactive hide details for Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 > AM---+1 --]Gabriele Columbro ---07/18/2016 09:19:33 AM---+1 -- > > From: Gabriele Columbro > To: [email protected] > Date: 07/18/2016 09:19 AM > Subject: Re: OpenCMIS 1.0 > -- > > > > +1 > > -- > Gabriele Columbro > Executive Director, Symphony Software Foundation > > > > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > > > > Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. > Would that be ok? > > What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > > > > > - Florian > > > > >
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
+1 Jay Brown Senior Engineer, ECM Development IBM Software Group From: Gabriele Columbro To: [email protected] Date: 07/18/2016 09:19 AM Subject:Re: OpenCMIS 1.0 +1 -- Gabriele Columbro Executive Director, Symphony Software Foundation > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > > Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. Would that be ok? > What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > > - Florian
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
+1 -- Gabriele Columbro Executive Director, Symphony Software Foundation > On Jul 18, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Florian Müller wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > > Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. Would > that be ok? > What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > > - Florian
Re: OpenCMIS 1.0
+1 going for 1.0 I'm okay with removing the deprecated methods. I expect that increasing the min. Java version will require some more discussions. Jens On 18/07/16 09:30, "Florian Müller" wrote: >Hi all, > >I think we are ready for OpenCMIS 1.0. What do you think? > >Before we release 1.0, I would like to remove all deprecated methods. >Would that be ok? >What do you think about raising the minimum JVM version from 6 to 7? > > >- Florian
