Github user vincentbernat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
it is not possible to have systemd support and build on 12.04 at the same
time. dh-systemd doesn't exist on 12.04 and its actions are quite important. If
you remove it and just install
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 50
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=100
Failed=1
Skipped=3
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user vincentbernat commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
Otherwise, I think the change to be compatible with 12.04 is OK (no Upstart
script should ever be provided in this case).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@marcaurele
> What is the reason to try fencing off VMs when the MS is not able to
determine its state? I cannot see a good reason so far but you seem to think
there is at least
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
@rhtyd Please go through #1563 as mentioned in my previous comment to get
the context. As @serg38 also mentioned the response differs between debian and
centos which needs to be addressed,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@vincentbernat I made some changes, built packages and was able to install
and run agent and usage server on both Ubuntu 12.04, 14.04 using the same
packages.
@wido @vincentbernat can you
hi all
We have the following environment:
- OS: Debian 14.04 (hypervisors and management)
- 4 KVM Hosts
- Cloudstack Release 4.9 with local database
Since we upgraded to Release 4.9 the KVM hosts no longer connect to the
management Server. Upgrade procedure was followed as described:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
Great idea, LGTM (based on the api-changes urls). @swill can we also sort
the list of new APIs by name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@rhtyd Seems good, but it would still not force the install of Java 8 on
Ubuntu 16.04
However, I don't think that's a blocker.
LGTM for me
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1640
@koushik-das which is IMHO wrong.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@wido actually on a fresh system it would first attempt to find and install
openjdk8, on existing ones if openjdk7 is installed then it won't force
openjdk8 by default. Thanks.
---
If your
GitHub user murali-reddy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
CLOUDSTACK-9339 Virtual Routers don't handle Multiple Public Interfaces
correctly for non-vpc networks
As pointed out in CLOUDSTACK-9339, in case of multiple public IP's from
different
Github user vincentbernat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647#discussion_r76039128
--- Diff: debian/rules ---
@@ -5,18 +5,9 @@ PACKAGE = $(shell dh_listpackages|head -n 1|cut -d '-' -f
1)
SYSCONFDIR = "/etc"
DESTDIR =
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
@nv, I am sorry, my bad; last time I read the code, I overlooked the method
com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.VirtualMachineMO.getAllDeviceList(). Having said
that, how do you feel about
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/40
@lmrv This is a great start!
I'm willing to merge this PR, but it's a work in progress so it will not be
visible on the main site until the translation is mostly completed.
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/40
@lmrv if you have a chance to update all files copyright header, to must
have the apache2 v2 license header.
Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@jburwell as an update, the smoke test has completed successfully, and I'll
let the component tests run overnight. Hopefully they will have finished by
the morning.
---
If your
I submitted PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1662
> 在 2016年8月24日,20:36,Will Stevens 写道:
>
> Hey Gust,
> Here are the details for contributing.
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
>
> You need to fork cloudstack and the
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
LGTM for testing. Vmware ESX 5.5 and 6.0 hypervisors, advanced networking,
RHEL 6 management servers
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 ~]# cat
/tmp//MarvinLogs/test_volumes_930LZ3/results.txt|grep
Hello,
I have some entries in my database for storage arrays that are no longer in
use. WHats the best way to go about removing these? The ones that have no GUID
do not show in the UI and the one that does (id 5) wont let me delete it even
though the XenServers cant mount it.
GitHub user digitalgust opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1662
Fix bug juniper srx
if the public interface has marked untagged ,the vlan is
âvlan://untaggedâ ,but old source is âuntaggedâ , so it will raise a
exception : Unable to parse
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@wido based on the ML discussion, I've removed the specific change that
removed 12.04 support. Can you send another PR for master for removing support
for 12.04.
---
If your project is set up
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647#discussion_r76004158
--- Diff: debian/rules ---
@@ -5,8 +5,17 @@ PACKAGE = $(shell dh_listpackages|head -n 1|cut -d '-' -f
1)
SYSCONFDIR = "/etc"
DESTDIR =
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
CLOUDSTACK-9466: Fix fk constraint failure in upgrade path
In the 4.1.0-4.2.0 db upgrade path, it creates new tables to store secondary
(nfs) storage in image_store table and volumes in
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
@dcarbone can you squash your commits and rebase against latest, thanks.
Please also amend git commit message to include the JIRA ID.
@jburwell I did not start my analysis, I'll do that once
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
LGTM
@koushik-das All tests are written to be execute on a Linux based
environment, though if you look at the test it does ssh into the guest VM and
then executes the ping. Afaik, we don't
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1651
@PaulAngus please squash you commits, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
LGTM on code review, this will fix the broken symlink for usage server
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
LGTM on code review, the fix is taking care of the removed column, thereby
maintaining the constraints.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647#discussion_r76006449
--- Diff: debian/rules ---
@@ -5,8 +5,17 @@ PACKAGE = $(shell dh_listpackages|head -n 1|cut -d '-' -f
1)
SYSCONFDIR = "/etc"
DESTDIR =
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@rhtyd Why another PR for against master? I thought we were merging forward?
This stuff is really starting to confuse me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
@rhtyd When this one merges and is merged forward I will send a PR for
master to remove 12.04 support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
Thanks @serg38 @abhinandanprateek for the review. With enough lgtms and
(manual) test result against a large pre-4.1 db, I'll proceed with merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
Thanks @abhinandanprateek @serg38 for the review. With enough lgtms and
travis/manual tests, I'll merge this (failing Travis tests are not due to this
change, but due to a tearDown issue).
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647#discussion_r76007356
--- Diff: debian/rules ---
@@ -5,8 +5,17 @@ PACKAGE = $(shell dh_listpackages|head -n 1|cut -d '-' -f
1)
SYSCONFDIR = "/etc"
DESTDIR =
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1647
Thanks @wido that makes sense.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
@jburwell fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1656
There are no upgrade tests to confirm the fix as all the changes are in an
older 4.1.0->4.2.0 upgrade path. After this fix, here are manual test results
to show that db upgrade finished cleanly
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1648
@jburwell can you review/lgtm now? thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1657
@jburwell no this is PR is related to packaging, while 1593 fixes something
different. The Travis build failure has been fixed at #1648, the failures are
unrelated to this PR. Since this is a
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1634
Merging based on lgtms and test results (the failures are due to env
issues, and failing tests not related to the pkging fix).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user fmaximus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1652
I will make the change. I also plan to only create the vpc offering if
there are Nuage VSP devices configured, which makes more sense for the users of
CloudStack that do not use our plugin.
Hi, Jayapal
why not submit a PR, in github desktop prompt:
You may not have permission to access cloudstack. Check Preferences to make
sure you’re still logged in.
I ensure i loved in.
> 在 2016年8月24日,12:52,Jayapal Uradi
Github user NuxRo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1653
Understood, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Thanks Will!
yes the repo is pointing to 4.9 release for all KVMs and for the
management server:
/cloudstack:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list //
//deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu trusty 4.9/
All KVM agents and the mgmt server are upgraded to release 4.9 based on
the
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
I don't think this implementation should change. This simply outputs the
results to a JSON object (which is unordered by definition). The generation of
the documentation is separate and that
Hi all,
Im trying to build the simple table for our support guys, which OS type (as
seen in ACS) is virtio emualted, and which is IDE/Intel emulation.
I dont seem to find this in DB, except the list of OS types, families etc.
Can someone give some info, where should I find if OS is supposed to
Andrija,
It's actually hard coded and based on the template namethis really needs to
be reworked.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/3a81a4498f6b56eb7330bc992f0c89f6cba86cb3/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java#L2885
- Si
GitHub user ProjectMoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1661
Export UUID for zone creation event completion.
Action events have support for exporting their "first class entities" over
the event bus, if it's turned on. This works mostly for
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
@ProjectMoon Jeff, could you help review this, as I believe you were the
first to point it out on the list.
From talking to Nathan, it sounds like we're not sure KVM is actually
Github user ProjectMoon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
All hypervisors are affected by this, since the parameter is just not
passed into the VM Manager. That means its effects don't work at all anywhere.
:) I will try to review it to tomorrow.
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
I'll let him comment on this, but If I recall, it had more to do with
implementation of force stopping with KVM rather than the lack of the parameter
being passing into the VM Manager.
---
Martin,
Were you able to fix your issue after installing packages from the repo Will
shared and restarting the services?
I've not personally tested the apt-get.eu repo, but I had earlier built this
repo which I'm personally using in my local KVM-trusty based cloud:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
Also we wrote a tester for SshHelper.sshExecute method. It was returning
output of SSHexecute command as it gets received by sshExecute. Here they are
100 sequential runs (success if result is
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@nathanejohnson excellent. I will keep any eye out for your updates.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
LGTM for the test.
Exception in network_acl_test **before the fix**
[root@ussarlabcsmgt41 cloudstack]# cat /tmp//MarvinLogs//NB313W/results.txt
Test network ACL lists and items in VPC
The PR and fix already exists in 4.9.0 release. Please make sure to upgrade all
of your management server(s) and KVM agents and then also restart them after
the upgrade.
If you are seeing SSL handshake failures, it could be due to network or
security issue and most likely due to mismatch
Hey Gust,
Here are the details for contributing.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
You need to fork cloudstack and the the change in your fork. Then you
create a pull request from your fork to ACS.
Let us know if you have problems following that guide.
Cheers,
That PR is already merged, so you don't have to do anything to get that
code, you already have it.
@rohit, can you review this? I think this is a similar to the issue Simon
reported earlier.
Will
On Aug 24, 2016 6:56 AM, "fanfarlo" wrote:
> hi all
>
> We have the
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
Thanks, this looks interesting. I'll try to get back to you on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1645
@jburwell
I'm hoping that I can spend a good part of today on the requests you've
made on my three open pull requests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
@rohit, I am guessing they should be installing the cloudstack-agent using
the following repo right? That is what is described in the upgrade (trusty
instead of precise though).
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu/dists/trusty/4.9/
@fanfarlo, are your repo's setup to point to the new 4.9
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660
CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Fix for test_network_acl, SshHelper
## Problem
In a Vmware environment, running `test_network_acl` we examined why
sometimes it failed and sometimes it passed.
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1605
Thanks @rafaelweingartner for your review! I've been working on it and
pushed changes based on your comments!
The only thing I need to mention is that actually I can't remove `throws
68 matches
Mail list logo