, and from
management (all fine with management logs...)
If anybody can help, I would very much appriciate this, since now I have
bunch fo VPC unoperational...
Thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
Date: 28 May 2014 14:50
Subject: Re: VPC's VR missing
,
this sound like something we seen as well.
can you check if this is it :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6485
thanks,
Daan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having big time problems with Public IP missing from VPC VR's
wrote:
Andrija,
nevertheless it sounds familiar. I will be back in the office on
monday and ask around.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Daan,
I don't think this is my issue, at least I don't make use of private
gateway - this is just
, at 1:08 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Daan,
my problem is that I'm in production for 3rd day now, and restoring DB
and
downgrading back to 4.2.1 doesn't seem as option for me at the moment,
since I would loose new acounts
:
Andrija, we plan to release it soon. It depends on how quickly issues
in it are fixed. The branch has been created, so you could test it and
report on it if you have an env to spare.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Will try, thx. Not sure good
(updatePhysicalNetwork) or your guestnetwork (re-create i'm afraid)
best of luck,
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Daan, thanks for info. And one final question - is it possible to change
Public vlan/range from untagged to tagged - editing vlan
Internet.
Thanks,
On 29 May 2014 11:06, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
500
is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your physical network? You
wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500!
--
Daan
nets
on the same interface (seems wrong).
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
I don't think editing DB table will work.
-Jayapal
On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's like this:
I have
Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
On 29/05/14 12:18, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is both tagged vlan 500,
and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and over eth1 to outside
world)...
On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland
) Created a
vif e4c362bd-764b-f651-dc9a-1abd5cb33c43 on 1
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
On 30/05/14 10:48, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Deen,
no, in DB there is field vlan_id with value untagged - that
vlan://untagged is shown from ACS gui, and is used
...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
Hi Andrija,
Just the start of the VR should be sufficient.
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com
+31 20-7506672
+31 6-51428188
On 30/05/14 13:48, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joris
+31 6-51428188
On 30/05/14 14:08, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joris,
here is the management log: http://pastebin.com/zxnKxFhk
Interesting parts (to me): in bold
2014-05-30 13:56:21,899 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.m.AncientDataMotionStrategy]
(Job-Executor-77:ctx-ec3d358e ctx
some help from someone with knowledge of this pice of the code. :)
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com
+31 20-7506672
+31 6-51428188
On 30/05/14 14:49, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joris,
I
mismatch issue might still be related. Try fixing that
first. At least it will allow us to exclude this from the list.
Kind regards,
Joris van Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
On 30/05/14 15:26, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, thanks Joris.
I will try playing with OS version
Lieshout
Schuberg Philis
On 30/05/14 15:33, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Joris,
do you have recommendation on how in particular to try ? I'm not sure how
to fix that, except playing with editing systemvm-4.3 template to define
it
as another OS type... ?
Thanks again
'/
boot dev='hd'/
/os
:(
On 30 May 2014 16:24, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
I confirm, the highest is Debian 5 64bit
Per docs
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.3/rnotes.html#upgrade-from-4-2-x-to-4-3
, you should use Debian 7.0 64bit
?
If that's the case then there's probably not an issue in BridgeVifDriver or
the XML. It is definitely in fetching/matching the eth device here
vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.0.52 -A -l 46.232.xxx.246 -c ethnull -g
46.232.xxx.1 -m 24 -n 46.232.xxx.0
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa
That's:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Procedure+to+Replace+realhostip.com+with+Your+Own+Domain+Name
thanks
On 6 June 2014 04:03, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Please find wiki [1] containing the procedure to replace realhostip.com
with Your own custom
Hi,
aftger upgrade to 4.3, I reported a bug where CS will not let me add
additional IP ranges when there are 2 vlans using same IP range - I
don't see point comparing IP ranges across two separate broadcast domains...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6814
Thanks,
--
Andrija
by Andrija Panic. fix by
updating on upgrade
This fix might have to be included in a 4.3.0 to 4.3.1 upgrade as well
Diffs
-
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade421to430.java 7e26132
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22093/diff/
Testing
---
live testing by Andrija
are skilled at java
you could isolate the upgrade step from the code in 4.4 resulting of
the patch and run it against your branch. You would need to feel very
comfortable with your env, (my)sql and java.
regards,
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
above,
Regards,
ilya
On 6/6/14, 5:48 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi,
aftger upgrade to 4.3, I reported a bug where CS will not let me add
additional IP ranges when there are 2 vlans using same IP range - I
don't see point comparing IP ranges across two separate broadcast
domains
Hi folks,
I'm trying to figure out - why is there no documentation on the NEED to
configure MTU inside VM, when using vxlan as guest isolation method ?
Right now, by defaut/design, traffic/MTU goes like this:
eth0 inside VM is by default 1500 bytes -- vnetY mtu1450 -- virbrX
mtu1450-- vxlan
tunables. I agree though that there would be no harm in putting a note
somewhere reminding the admin of vxlan encapsulation requirements. You
can
submit a patch for the docs to reviewboard.
On Oct 26, 2014 7:39 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying
So here we go:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7790
I propose having ADMIN choose MTU size when deploying new Network/VPC
offer...that is per my understanding the only 100% working solution...
On 26 October 2014 16:57, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcus, I
Hi guys,
snapshoting is broken on CentOS 6.5 - because RedHat removed the -s flag
within qemu-img tool in the 6.5 binaries - and this -s flag is still
being used in latest ACS 4.4.1.
Is this going to be fixed any time soon, or what are the plan's for this ?
--
Andrija Panić
/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
CentOS 7 will not be affected by it whenever ACS will support it.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Anybody ?
On 3 November 2014 15:23, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
do we have any plans in some near future to imlement full VM KVM
snapshots. So not single volume snaphost, but a reall VM snapshots. It is
already there for Xen/VMware, but not KVM.
Any thoughts, ETA
the barriers I currently know for implementing it.
Wido
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anybody ?
On 3 November 2014 15:23, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
do we
Hi team,
is anybody of you aware of the GUI issues when connected to some i.e.
wireless with somewhat big latencies or it sometimes happen even on more
than good internet connection:
i.e:
1)
(A serious one, that we encounter pretty often):
Issue: I start new VM deloyment wizard, choose template
Hi guys,
I have just run into (GUI) bug in CS 4.4.1:
Clicked on freshly deployed instance, clicked on Show Volumes, detached
volume and deleted it - later I realized that the volume belonged some
other VM.
Confirmed again, by clicking on this same new VM, clicking on show volumes,
and when I
comments.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel
Thanks again!
Mike
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi team,
is anybody of you aware of the GUI issues when connected
..
Seems to be browser independent and happens on all browsers.
Regards
ilya
On 11/13/14, 8:11 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi Mike,
thanks for responding. Here is the ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7907
Not sure if it makes any sense to report other bugs/improvements
Here is part of explanation - from NUX:
http://www.nux.ro/archive/2014/01/Taking_KVM_volume_snapshots_with_Cloudstack_4_2_on_CentOS_6_5.html
best
On 14 November 2014 07:16, Star Guo st...@ceph.me wrote:
Hi CS developers,
I find brand of 4.5 scripts/storage/qcow2/managesnapshot.sh as
Hi guys,
I'm wondering why us there a check
inside /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/kvmheartbeat.sh
?
I understand that the KVM host checks availability of Primary Storage, and
reboots itself if it can't write to storage.
But, if we have say, 3 NFS in a cluster, then lot
tags to guarantee each host only uses one
NFS).
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm wondering why us there a check
inside
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/kvmheartbeat.sh
?
I understand that the KVM host
Hi Dan,
would you mind provide 4.4.2 RPMs somewhere so we can test the upgrade from
4.4.1 ?
best
On 17 November 2014 09:56, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
People,
I want to make a new 4.4 release after not delivering the quality I
would like for 4.4.0 and 4.4.1. I want to
, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have just run into (GUI) bug in CS 4.4.1:
Clicked on freshly deployed instance, clicked on Show Volumes, detached
volume and deleted it - later I realized that the volume belonged some
other VM.
Confirmed again, by clicking
Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you maybe consider ZFS on
Linux, mounted on /var/lib/libvirt/images/ - there you can add SSD for
writings and perhaps read cache (SLOG for writes and L2ARC for readings) ?
On 17 November 2014 19:37, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi guys,
Do you know
Upgrade fine for me - no issues at all... - from the RPMs snapshots
On 17 November 2014 14:36, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion pdion...@apache.org
wrote:
Trying devcloud4 with 4.4 branch and I'm having this issue:
I don't see
Gents - my point of view on the cloudstack and the work arround it is the
folowing:
- Pretty lacking documentation
- Working on new fancy features - instead of making current features work
at all...
- Few examples:
-- new vxlan isolation method was introduced some release ago - default
MTU of
quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 17 November, 2014 19:07:15
Subject: Re: Multiple local storage pools?
Lucian, don't relly have the answer - but did you
filesystem in a specific place.
For example, set the host with tag 'host1', the storage with tag
'host1ssd', and create a service offering with both storage tag and host
tag to select that combination. Kind of a hack, but it should work.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa
my 2 cents again:
Whether we have this LTS release or not - is not just about having release
- we need a WAY to focus here on FIXING, POLISHING product and more
important to stimulate/make developers interested in doing so.
If this was company owned product, it would be very easy to set goals,
For me personaly, this Cloudstack feature is used only during damn I
forgot my password and during deploying new VM from template.
After I get access to VM - the password should be really changed anyway.
I agree it's unsecure, but again you are supposed to change it - and not
hope that the
Hi guys,
just wanted to know if NFS mount options for Primary Storage are hardcoded
in the source, or do we let OS use it's default... ?
It seems to me it is not hardcoded, but I would really like confirmation
pls.
Thanks,
-
Andrija Panić
thx Wido...
On 28 November 2014 at 15:07, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 11/28/2014 01:37 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi guys,
just wanted to know if NFS mount options for Primary Storage are
hardcoded
in the source, or do we let OS use it's default... ?
They come from
I think it would be usefull to have that resize feature for all guests
(Linux, Windows, etc) - but perhaps customizes the Resize function to
perform partition resize inside Linux (if we are deploying new VM from
Linux template) - or simply do not do anything inside guest OS, just resize
the drive
of libguestfs (which
btw can deal with Windows, too); ACS uses qemu-img [resize] in KVM.
HTH
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent
Exactly, there may be more than 1 partion on that 1 drive.. So just
increase disk size, and let administaror handle the inside VM job
On 1 December 2014 at 09:34, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
I have
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
But that means user can not create desired volume during instance set-up.
If we would like to have, for example, VM with disk offers from 5-100Gb I
need to create dozen of same templates that differ only at root size.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija
HI Vadim,
first repo is official one, second repo is shapeblue's repo, since they
also provide RPMs for convinience and with some patches...
Anyway, you will go with official one.
Cheers
On 1 December 2014 at 11:12, Vadim Kimlaychuk vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
Hello Dev-s
I
and I should do it other way? For example we say to
the customer, that
you have unallocated space if you select different size and
extend partition by
yourself?
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday
+1
On 1 December 2014 at 14:31, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 8:08 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hello,
As a project we currently don't have a lot of insight
to be the
choice of others (official fedora/centos/ubuntu templates are like this
as
well).
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 1
Hi.
wondering if it is possible to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1 ?
I have 1 NFS box, 2 x 10GB cards inside, don't want to do bonding, but
efectively present this single box as 2 boxes via 2 IP adresses - so in
this scenario I need to set overprovisioning factor to less than 1, to
not just nfs export half of the space instead? (you could use lvm,
thin-lvm etc)?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev
Console proxy VM use web server I beleive...both 80 and 443
Not sure about SSVM though...
On 3 December 2014 at 13:23, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
I noticed today that CS system VMs have a running apache webserver
listening ports 80 and 443. I looked at
+1 what Nux said - I'm aware of many web developers NOT knowing what the
SSH keys are at all, and thus not using them... most of them relly on
passwords... but nice to have ssh keys for rest of us.
On 3 December 2014 at 16:52, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Keys are not for everyone. Passwords are
Hi guys,
still wondering is there any interest into imlementing the VM snapshoot for
KVM ?
We desperately need it, so will try to contribute anyway we can (not me
obviosuly, not a developer, but my colegues will).
Can you give some guidance on this subject - I'm aware of the design
documents
hypervisor does it ? This option
at user interface exists, but I didn't see it worked.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 12:51 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: KVM - VM
Hm... I see that in XS 6.0.2 it was impossible to do memory snapshot unless
you had a licenced XS ? Is this still the case with XS 6.2 ?
On 8 December 2014 at 12:43, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
wrote:
Anybody interested ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926
Best
--
Andrija Panić
Hi,
when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
logs as remote IP.
Why is this behaviour - and can this be changed ?
My understanding is that this is kind of bug (unless needed for some other
we change this ?
I'm on the ACS 4.3 currently...
cheers
On 8 December 2014 at 23:42, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
when doing port forwarding on VPC VR - port 80 - when some client access
web site - only the main Public IP of the VPC is logged in apache access
logs
saw this kind of behaviour on any router anywhere...
On 9 December 2014 at 00:03, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
And just to spice things a little bit, ALL remote connections appears to
come from main
Hi Marcus,
static NAT (outound connections) works fine - when internal VM access
internet, it's source address is replaced with the MAIN public IP of the
VPC VR (call it IP1 in my example - x.x.x.x) - so all fine.
Then I have additional public IPs to be able to do port forwarding... -
when I do
Recent reply from Vadim:
http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar rajsekhar@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Star,
Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
how can i check the band width rate of the
as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos
properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.
Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth)
through xencenter or commandline process in
http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
,
if i shutdown the VM from
On 10-Dec-2014, at 2:15 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings
cloudstack always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you
configure manually on KVM/Xen..
On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar rajsekhar
to make sure we're not confusing terms here, static NAT is a port
forward for all ports, basically mapping IP2 in whole to an instance. I
think you're referring to SNAT (source NAT) when you say outbound static
NAT looks fine, but I'm not sure.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrija Panic
Static NAT (all port forwarding) - also broken, all connections to private
IP on VM, seems to come from main Public IP of VPC VR, instead of real
client's IP... :(
Will test 4.4 and possibly 4.5rc now...
On 10 December 2014 at 13:56, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcus
Seems al fine (port forwarding AND static NAT) on 4.4.1. Just tested.
@Rohit - Is it too late now to actually submit a bug for this port
forwarding - and possibly backport to 4.3.2 ?
Thanks
On 11 December 2014 at 10:25, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Static NAT (all port
Indra, did you observe this on Shared Network - I had same issue with
Shared Network (public IPs) in Advanced Zone.
I think VR for VPC is NOT a problem...
On 15 December 2014 at 13:13, Indra Pramana in...@sg.or.id wrote:
Dear all,
We are using CloudStack 4.2.0 with KVM hypervisors.
Is
is
not known, unlike the VR on a shared network which will automatically use
the second IP on the subnet after the gateway (e.g. x.x.x.2).
Is there a way to configure dnsmasq not to response to recursive queries?
Thank you.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa
Hi,
I managed to capture some (bug?) - you start new VM wizard, click all the
way through the end, and after pressing the FINISH button - simply nothing
happens, no spining weel in UI, nothing...
Here is my comment - please check this - seems pretty annoying for end
user...
...@citrix.com:
I've responded on the ticket.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 December 2014 09:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Deploy new VM - click on Finish
On 17 December 2014 at 15:25, Alexey Samarin nrg3...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, yes!
Аfter an attempt to create a VM, in the Web console appears - the element
is
not found.
Thanks!
2014-12-17 17:11 GMT+03:00 Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com:
Alex,
After you have the error - please
+1 for sorting - somwhat painfull to find domains in current situation...
On 18 December 2014 at 11:35, Gabor Apati-Nagy gabor.apati-n...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think sorting would be good to have, but I would not change the display
format because that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting
Hi folks,
I'm designing some stuff - and wondering which crime to commit - I have 2
posible scenarios in my head
I have folowing NICs available on compute nodes:
1 x 1G NIC
2 x 10G NIC
I was wondering which approach would be better, as I', thinking about 2
possible sollutions at the moment,
= Guest and Public traffic
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 10:06 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Physical network design options - which crime to comit
Hi folks,
I'm
, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Actually, I would highly consider nic bonding for storage network if
possible.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 4:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us
generally
doesn't consider primary storage in its architecture design as it mostly
relies on recommendation from the hypervisor vendors.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 5:59 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev
...@citrix.com wrote:
Interaction with primary storage would be via the hypervisor. SSVM doesn't
access the primary storage directly.
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 1:52 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc
16, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seems to me, that I'm about to issue something similar to: update
cloud.vm_instance set ha = 0 where ha =1...
Now seriously, wondering, per the manual - if you define HA host tag on
the
global config level, and then have
@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 16 February, 2015 11:32:13 AM
Subject: Re: Disable HA temporary ?
On 16-02-15 11:00, Andrija Panic wrote:
Hi team,
I just had funny behaviour few days ago - one of my hosts was under
heavy
load (some disk/network load) and it went disconnected from
BIG +1
My team should submit some patch to ACS for better KVM snapshots, including
whole VM snapshot etc...but it's too early to give details...
best
On 16 February 2015 at 13:01, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
Hello guys,
I was hoping to have some feedback from the community
Hi,
I have crazy agent on one of the hosts, that is being killed each morning
and I found this in /var/log/audit.log:
type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1424321463.930:430678): auid=0 uid=0 gid=0
ses=68891 pid=10831 comm=jsvc reason=memory violation sig=6
I dont remember changing anything on the system,
+1 !
On Jan 28, 2015 10:01 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:44 PM, John Kinsella j...@stratosec.co wrote:
Every time there’s an issue (security or otherwise) with the system VM
ISOs, it’s a relative pain to fix. They’re sort of a closed system,
people
.
For example fail2ban will block ALL access to ssh because it only ever
sees the VR IP address.
Upgrading to 4.3.2 did not fix it.
This needs fixing urgently.
Best regards
Paul
On 17 Mar 2015, at 14:01, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
is anybody willing
Hi guys,
refreshing old subject with a more details:
I just upgrade to ACS 4.3.2 (shapeblue upstream repo) and systemvm also to
4.3.2 (shapeblue with GHOST patch)
I still have same problems as with ACS 4.3.0 (comunity repo, comunity
systemvm template)
PROBLEM:
When I do Port Forwarding, or
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7926
Currently I have hit a bug, when I click on some instance, then on View
Volumes, and then I get listed volumes that belong to some other VM - it
already happened to me that I deleted the volumes - beacuse of ACS bug in
GUI !
So, I
Hi,
just filed the new bug:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8333
Nothing critical, but should be fixes (if not done already in newer
releases)
When all IPs are consumed (no more IPs available) in the Shared Guest
network then folowing is true in 4.3.2
- In the Add Instance
names before deleting to make sure I do
the right one.
This little bug is annoying to say the least )))
Andrei
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 18 March, 2015 11:58:53 AM
Subject: BUG: anybody
Hi guys,
we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right before
that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used for SHARED GUEST network
anymore.
And some VMs are down - and cant be started because they depend on this
VR...
VPC VRs are
as we speak...
On 16 March 2015 at 14:52, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
Have you managed to get to the bottom of this?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: us
?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 15 March, 2015 16:19:07
Subject: [URGENT - HELP NEEDED]
Hi
?
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
we have updated the cloudstack from 4.3.0 to 4.3.2 (OS updated right
before
that, from CentOS 6.5 to CentOS 6.6)
And now I can not start SYSTEM VR - that is used for SHARED GUEST network
anymore
, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not really - we are painfully migrating stopped VMs, from VPS network
(Guest Shared netwotk) to VPCs...
MGMT server sends the STOP command to agent, even though the VM was
never
started, BUT the storage provisioning
+1 here, already needed this feature and Deevdep proposed the way ti
implement it...
On 16 March 2015 at 13:39, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature Disabling
1 - 100 of 669 matches
Mail list logo
