org.apache.cocoon:cocoon-pipeline-impl:jar:1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
is still missing, see attached log if you want
Sorry, actually it's a little different now. The missing artifact
now is
org.apache.cocoon:cocoon-configuration-api:jar:1.0.3-SNAPSHOT
I'm testing this locally.
BTW. What version of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörg Heinicke reopened COCOON-2152:
---
What about trunk? Ellis indicated it's an issue there as well.
EventAware cache does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörg Heinicke updated COCOON-1703:
--
Status: Continued (was: On Hold)
A patch for caching fonts (fixes GDI issues), vertical
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörg Heinicke updated COCOON-1958:
--
Status: Continued (was: On Hold)
Some Errors by serializing with the HSSFGenerator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörg Heinicke updated COCOON-1606:
--
Status: Continued (was: On Hold)
No feedback, but issue shouldn't be on hold.
[BUG+PATCH]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jörg Heinicke updated COCOON-1740:
--
Status: Continued (was: On Hold)
Missing test case isn't really a reason for on hold.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603751#action_12603751
]
Jörg Heinicke commented on COCOON-1858:
---
What's missing here? Is it still an issue
On 09.06.2008 22:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: joerg
Date: Mon Jun 9 19:40:16 2008
New Revision: 665954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=665954view=rev
Log:
as a follow-up of COCOON-2168 (http://marc.info/?t=12089986853r=1w=4):
Cocoon's pipeline buffer increases from an
Moving this discussion from users list (for reference [1]) to dev list.
On 06.06.2008 19:02, Alfred Nathaniel wrote:
Warning: I'm stating my own opinion here, nothing official or something like
that.
There are at least three problems with XSP:
1. No active committer is interested in XSP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12603768#action_12603768
]
Jörg Heinicke commented on COCOON-2168:
---
The allocated memory for the buffer will
On 07.06.2008 03:13, Andy Stevens wrote:
Out of interest, have you raised an enhancement request and/or a patch
with the OpenJDK project[1]? It seems to me this increasing buffer
behaviour would be useful more generally...
Done.
Joerg
11 matches
Mail list logo