On 6/10/11 12:30 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
I've used scannotation before, which is reasonably well known I
believe, but could probably be improved on. I think with multiple
versions at Apache, it is a perfect concept for commons. I would check
out [discovery] first to see if that has a
Hi all guys,
I just received the confirmation from Craig (secretary@a.o) that
received the confirmation of my SoftwareGrant for Meiyo.
I'll start a new VORE soon!
Have a nice weekend, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at
On 6/10/11 2:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/06/2011 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Jun 10, 2011, at 13:47, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/06/2011 17:47, Phil Steitz wrote:
I guess I want it both ways here. We already have a use case for
tracking instances - abandoned connection
This is over my head. For all I know this may apply to all of our
components, since I think the metadata comes from Commons Parent.
Can someone knowledgeable in OSGI please have a look and comment on
the ticket and post back here if there is something we need to
change in Commons Parent?
Hi all guys,
before moving commons-graph on sandbox... does it make sense having
graph2 directory when we *never* released the 1?
IMHO the move should be
svn move https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/dormant/graph2
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/graph
Does it make sense
On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
I have looked at this some more and I think we have two choices,
depending on how much we want to be able to do in terms of
monitoring and instance management. The simplest solution is to
enable only holding references to instances checked out to
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I already sent the signed SoftwareGrant to secretary@ and this
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performance
anyway.
chas
On 6/11/11 5:54 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 11/06/2011
On 11/06/2011 12:26, Honton, Charles wrote:
Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performance
anyway.
I suggest you take a look in the
+1 - I don't think I'd call it meiyo, though.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to
graph is fine
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
before moving commons-graph on sandbox... does it make sense having
graph2 directory when we *never* released the 1?
IMHO the move should be
svn move
[X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
As far as I know you wrote it alone, so you could simply drop it into
the sandbox? I have asked the same b/c I wrote a JSON lib
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also for other Sandbox proposals I used to
call for a
Thanks James, I'm going to do it NOW!!! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:54 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
graph is fine
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
Am 11.06.2011 16:13, schrieb simonetrip...@apache.org:
Author: simonetripodi
Date: Sat Jun 11 14:12:59 2011
New Revision: 1134648
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1134648view=rev
Log:
fixed copyright years
Modified:
Hi Oliver!!
thanks a lot for having noticed it, I didn't pay attention on it!!!
THANKS
Have a nice weekend, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 11.06.2011
Le 11/06/2011 13:54, James Carman a écrit :
graph is fine
Fine to me too. In fact in this case graph2 would even be inconvenient,
as people may ask about it.
Luc
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
before moving commons-graph on
Le 11/06/2011 14:08, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
@James: sure, Meiyo ATM is just an alias of this initial codebase, we
still have to find a general consensus if it has to be released as a
proper component or including different parts to different existing
components
@Christian: I thought so, also
Hi,
I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
and then would switch to a dynamically generated parser.
Unfortunately, it is almost
On Jun 11, 2011, at 11:49, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to
detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be
possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj
and then
Hi Jochen!!!
green light from my side, that would be a *great* improvement IMHO!!!
Targeting to a different package would at the same time help you
detecting the differences with current code, so filling missing parts
should be less painful.
Thanks a lot in advance for your help and feel free to
Merci beaucoup Luc,
IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
Bonne soirée,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
On 6/11/11 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
I have looked at this some more and I think we have two choices,
depending on how much we want to be able to do in terms of
monitoring and instance management. The simplest solution is to
enable only holding
Just do it (as Nike would say)!
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Merci beaucoup Luc,
IIUC the general consensus shown in the previous thread should be
enough to start working on the sandbox, right?
Bonne soirée,
Simo
On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
[X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
Interesting project, but is a vote really necessary?
It is not necessary to VOTE to begin work on a new sandbox
component. It is
On 6/11/11 4:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/06/2011 12:26, Honton, Charles wrote:
Please look at java.util.IdentityHashMap again. I think it does
everything you're looking for except concurrent access. Given other
requirements, I'm not sure a ConcurrentHashMap will buy much performance
Forgot to add my +1 to accept the code.
Thanks!
Phil
On 6/11/11 10:40 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/11/11 4:56 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
[X ] +1, accept Meiyo as a new component in Sandbox;
[ ] +/-0
[ ] -1, because (please provide a reason why)
Interesting project, but is a vote really
On 11/06/2011 18:18, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/11/11 2:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/06/2011 08:44, Phil Steitz wrote:
I too think that the second option is the way to go using system
identity hashcodes. I'm not sure that the first option will be faster
since iterating through the List of
+1
Oliver
Am 11.06.2011 12:16, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
after having discussed about it[1], since looks like there's interest
about, I'm here to propose (I'm on forced vacations and have a lot of
spare time to dedicate to oss :D ) to accept Meiyo as a new component
in Sandbox.
I
Hello,
I checked out the code today and when I ran 'mvn install', it failed. I've
attached to document for error. Just wanted to know, if this is known
behavior at this time?
I have attached the error log with this email and its compilation error.
Thanks and regards,
Arshad
[INFO] Scanning for
Hi Arshad
it is known, I'm in the middle of updating the code, just give me the
time to start :D
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Arshad Ansari arshadansar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I checked out the code today and when I
[Posting here because the JIRA web server is down.]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 06:32:59PM +, Luc Maisonobe (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13047964#comment-13047964
]
Hi Gilles,
Le 11/06/2011 22:22, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
[Posting here because the JIRA web server is down.]
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 06:32:59PM +, Luc Maisonobe (JIRA) wrote:
[
Hi all,
Can we make a new release ? OGNL is under incubation still but that
shouldn't be a problem.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
-
To
Hi Lukasz,
I don't know if you already noticed the Jochen message, but he's
working in order to have OGNL-8 fixed, I'd wait for it before
releasing it.
WDYT? Have a nice weekend, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:55
Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
Thanks in advance
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/6/11 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org:
Hi Lukasz,
I don't know if you already noticed the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over.
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men
2011/6/11 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart
lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ?
Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over.
Thanks Jochen! I'm
39 matches
Mail list logo
