[Numbers] Make "Complex" a "final" class? (Was: [...] API of "Complex")

2018-02-02 Thread Gilles
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:30:00 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: Hi All: I like the "of" prefix but I think it might be odd to force the convention for ALL factories. It might be an English language thing for me. For example, (picking a made up example) this reads really well to me: Pair.of(foo,

Re: [Numbers] Make "Complex" a "final" class?

2018-02-02 Thread Gilles
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 13:20:21 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Some of the classes you are talking about are what I call VALJOs. Follow these guidelines and your class will be well placed for the future. http://blog.joda.org/2014/03/valjos-value-java-objects.html Thanks. In that post, you

Re: [Numbers] Make "Complex" a "final" class? (Was: [...] API of "Complex")

2018-02-02 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Some of the classes you are talking about are what I call VALJOs. Follow these guidelines and your class will be well placed for the future. http://blog.joda.org/2014/03/valjos-value-java-objects.html Stephen On 2 February 2018 at 12:45, Gilles wrote: > On Thu, 1

Re: [How to contribute] How to contribute to the community

2018-02-02 Thread Yan, Xianming
hi stefan thanks for your reply. i have a lot of free time. i will check the informatin you gave me first and decie what next. Thanks Xianming ? 2018?2?24:41?Stefan Bodewig > ??? Hello On 2018-02-02, Yan, Xianming wrote: I just joined the

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 Le 2 févr. 2018 18:54, "Mark Thomas" a écrit : Hello all, I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing service that a

[VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Mark Thomas
Hello all, I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing service that a number of ASF projects use. We'll work most things out as we go along

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2018-02-02, Mark Thomas wrote: > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but > not limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing > service that a number of ASF projects use. +1 Stefan

[VOTE] Release Commons Compress 1.16 based on RC1

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
As indicated I think it is time to get Compress 1.16 out. Compress 1.16 RC1 is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/ (svn revision 24646) The tag is here:

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread sebb
On 2 February 2018 at 17:54, Mark Thomas wrote: > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > > The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not > limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing service that

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
+1 Emmanuel Bourg Le 02/02/2018 à 18:54, Mark Thomas a écrit : > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > > The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not > limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing service >

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 but use JIRA not GH. Gary On Feb 2, 2018 10:54, "Mark Thomas" wrote: > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > > The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not > limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Rob Tompkins
+1, the project convention is jira but I’m indifferent. Could be interesting to use github issues. > On Feb 2, 2018, at 12:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > > The scope of the component is code

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 02.02.2018 um 18:54 schrieb Mark Thomas: > Hello all, > > I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. > > The scope of the component is code signing utilities including, but not > limited to, Ant and Maven plugins for the Symantec code signing service > that a

[io] New filevisitor package

2018-02-02 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: I propose a new package for [IO]: org.apache.commons.io.filevisitor. This package will implementations of FileVisitor just like our filefilter package contains implementations of java.io.FileFilter. These implementation can then be used with the more efficient Java 7 Files.walk()

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Compress 1.16 based on RC1

2018-02-02 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 >From src zip file: ASC, MD5, SHA1, SHA512 OK. RAT check OK. CLIRR check fails as noted: [ERROR] 7013: org.apache.commons.compress.compressors.lz77support.LZ77Compressor$Block: Abstract method 'public org.apache.commons.compress.compressors.lz77support.LZ77Compressor$Block$BlockType

Re: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing

2018-02-02 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
+1 Greetings Bernd Von: Mark Thomas Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2018 18:54 An: Commons Developers List Betreff: [VOTE] Create new component commons-signing Hello all, I propose that we create a new component [commons-signing]. The scope of the component is code signing utilities including,

Re: [How to contribute] How to contribute to the community

2018-02-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hello On 2018-02-02, Yan, Xianming wrote: > I just joined the mail group welcome. > and want to do some contribution for the project, but don't know > how. If anyone know would you please tell me. First of all you should find out what it is that looks like fun to you. Which of the several