Please use 2.8.0, I've been using the 3 part version format for all recent
releases. I think it would be nice to follow this naming here.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 22:30 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> Thanks, Bruno! I'm going to go ahead and cancel this vote so I can fix
> the README. I also noticed
Hard to say without seeing a PR. I expect that the code would support
generating foo_bar (for variables) as well as FOO_BAR (for constants).
Gary
Gary
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, 07:38 Ratul Sharker
wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> Good evening. Lately I was in need of an operation to convert a camel case
>
Hi There,
Good evening. Lately I was in need of an operation to convert a camel case
string into a snake case string. Searching in google forwarded me to
"org.apache.commons.text.CaseUtils" which has `toCamelCase(...)`.
I want to contribute my implementation of `toSnakeCase(...)` similar to
I think there's an issue with all the existing Docker files.
They install both 64-bit and 32-bit packages.
This is fine if the output ends up in different directories (or if the
output is the same).
However that is definitely not the case for opensslconf.h.
At present the 64-bit version is also
I went back and reviewed docker setup at your link:
https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/tree/79374289bdd227b5b668039c9336cd10d9e3bf7c/src/docker
Nice work. I agree that it's more flexible and provides the same
capability. The instructions were straightforward and the end result was a
full
On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 15:59, Alex Remily wrote:
>
> I went back and reviewed docker setup at your link:
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-crypto/tree/79374289bdd227b5b668039c9336cd10d9e3bf7c/src/docker
>
> Nice work.
Props to you for getting the initial build working.
I just tweaked it.
>
Gary,
I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
If not, I'd prefer to wait for the next release since "2.8" is
consistent with previous commons-configuration releases and the vote
has already started on rc2.
Regards,
Matt J
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:45 AM Gary
Hello.
Le mer. 22 juin 2022 à 20:59, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Gary,
>
> I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
Although Gary's suggestion would be a slight improvement, most
of the components indeed do not follow that convention.
This is the kind of common
I can't say it's a convention, it's just the pattern I've been following.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, 14:59 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
> If not, I'd prefer to wait for the next release since "2.8" is
> consistent with
