I was referring to projects.a.o but that does not make sense now that I
look at the page.
Gary
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023, 5:19 PM sebb wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 20:47, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Or have a dormant section on the page?
>
> What page are you referring to?
>
> Note that DOAPs
This did not happen at the time, but there has been little activity
since then, and the code does not even build (circular reference in
pom, and old Maven required).
I'll try again.
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 13:54, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021, 07:16
Hm, I guess it does not make sense to run these on a schedule, unlike
Dependabot.
Gary
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 4:37 PM sebb wrote:
> I don't understand why Scorecard analysis and CodeQL are being run
> weekly as well as on push/pull.
>
> Does the output somehow change if there has been no
That's not going to work, please see the comments in the POM. Needs work.
Revert for now I say.
Gary
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 11:58 AM GitBox wrote:
>
> The GitHub Actions job "Java CI" on commons-logging.git has failed.
> Run started by GitHub user asfgit (triggered by asfgit).
>
> Head commit
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 17:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> That's not going to work, please see the comments in the POM. Needs work.
Not sure what comments you are referring to.
If there is a reason not to use a particular default goal, it seems to
me it should be documented alongside the goal,
+1, signatures, site, builds, and release notes all good
Send it!
> On Oct 23, 2023, at 1:07 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant enhancements
> since Apache Commons CLI 1.5.0 was released, so I would like to
> release Apache Commons CLI 1.6.0.
+1 - all looks appropriate, signatures, site, builds, RELEASE-NOTES.txt,
Thank you again Gary and team for all the hard work!
> On Oct 25, 2023, at 5:45 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> My +1. More reviews please
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 7:34 PM Bruno Kinoshita
> wrote:
>
>> [x] +1
Please revert or fix the build.
There are large comment blocks in at least three locations in the POM
detailing why running Maven in a normal way will not work.
Thank you,
Gary
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023, 3:02 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 17:19, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > That's not
Shoulda prefixed with "[RESULT]", now.
Gary
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:42 PM Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This RC vote passes with the following binding +1 votes:
>
> - Bruno Kinoshita
> - Gary Gregory
> - Rob Tompkins
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
> >
> > +1 - all
This RC vote passes with the following binding +1 votes:
- Bruno Kinoshita
- Gary Gregory
- Rob Tompkins
Gary
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:08 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> +1 - all looks appropriate, signatures, site, builds, RELEASE-NOTES.txt,
>
> Thank you again Gary and team for all the hard
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 11:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> In older times, we were more concerned with providing a somewhat self
> contained source zip/tar.
Not sure how that is relevant.
> I am concerned that hyperlinking these files
> would add another step and be a hassle to GitHub users, like
[x] +1 Release these artifacts
Site reports OK, building fine on
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.8.1, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform
In older times, we were more concerned with providing a somewhat self
contained source zip/tar. I am concerned that hyperlinking these files
would add another step and be a hassle to GitHub users, like myself. I
really like having at least all top level type of information in the Readme
such that
[x] +1 Release these artifacts
Site reports and build both OK! Thanks!
Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.8.5
Java version: 17.0.8.1, vendor: Private Build, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk-amd64
Default locale: en_US, platform
My +1. More reviews please
Gary
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 7:34 PM Bruno Kinoshita
wrote:
> [x] +1 Release these artifacts
>
> Site reports look OK, checked some files in dist area, building fine on
> Apache Maven 3.8.5 (3599d3414f046de2324203b78ddcf9b5e4388aa0)
> Maven home:
These files can be generated by the build plugin.
As such, most of the information is duplicated across all the repositories.
This is convenient for users - provided that it is up to date.
The problem is that making any changes is very time-consuming:
- update build-plugin
- vote on release
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
