Re: [io] Moving to Java 6 for version 2.3

2012-03-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 1:53 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrot However, a compatibility break would require a major version bump. if my lib does drop support for a specific jdk, isn't that a compatibility

Re: [Math] maven: Problem with clirr

2012-04-25 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Is the next version of Math expected to be binary compatible with the previous. If so, we should take this serious. Otherwise, we should possibly disable clirr for now, for example by enabling it in the release- and rc-profiles only. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Gilles Sadowski

Git support?

2012-05-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Completely OT: Is Git supported now? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13276416#comment-13276416 -- Bildung kommt von Bildschirm und nicht von Buch, sonst hieße es ja Buchung. Dieter

Re: Git support?

2012-05-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Completely OT: Is Git supported now? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13276416#comment-13276416 -- Bildung kommt von Bildschirm und nicht

Re: Git support?

2012-05-23 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: If we propose to switch one component first, I would be happy to volunteer for switching [math]. What do other developers think about Jochen idea ? +2, for Luc as a volunteer Git Ambassador, and for Math as a test

Re: [math] LocalizedFormats.ALPHA and BETA no longer used

2012-05-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: Le 24/05/2012 21:27, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : Hi, commit 1342404 solves MATH-791. It turns out that LocalizedFormats.ALPHA and BETA are no longer used. I wanted to remove them, but that breaks the compatibility.

Re: [IO] Upcoming IO 2.4

2012-06-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Felix Meschberger fmesc...@adobe.com wrote: Would you consider a bug/patch and include it in the release ? That would be most welcome, as you certainly understand much more about OSGI than we do. Please be so kind and file a Jira issue, and attach the patch to

Re: [Math] How to select a specific JDK ?

2012-06-13 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Yes, that switch is called PATH (environment variable). On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote: Hello. Are there command-line switches that will select a specific JDK? I.e. I have several of them installed: $ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm total 36

Re: which artifact repository to get commons-io from?

2012-06-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
What build tool are you using? Maven at least, should find commons-io anyways. If any public commons-io release is not in the public Maven repository, then file a bug report against commons-io: That's got to be fixed. On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:33 PM, rupert thurner rupert.thur...@gmail.com

Re: which artifact repository to get commons-io from?

2012-06-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Commons-IO 2.4 has not made it to a Maven repo yet. I am working on it... Any problems, you could use help with? -- In other words: what could be seen as a socially debilitating failure of character can certainly work

Re: [chain] Next steps for release?

2012-07-13 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Elijah Zupancic eli...@apache.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chain 2.0 is dev complete. As a newbie committer, I was wondering what steps that I need to take in order to cut a release?

Proposal Commons-JNDI

2012-08-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I'd like to propose a new component Commons JNDI for the sandbox. The aim would be to have a very lightweight JNDI implementation (no server, or something like that) that's not necessarily suitable for production, but ideally suited for use in test suites, and the like. For example, commons

Re: Proposal Commons-JNDI

2012-08-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote: Jochen Wiedmann wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose a new component Commons JNDI for the sandbox. The aim would be to have a very lightweight JNDI implementation (no server, or something like that) that's

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Parent 27-RC1

2012-09-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 27-RC1. Changes in this version include: - update maven-site-plugin to 3.1 in reporting section - use properties for all reporting plugins to ensure

Re: My Jira Privileges

2012-11-21 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Thanks, Luc! On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.frwrote: Le 21/11/2012 20:05, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit : Hi, I'd like to close FILEUPLOAD-213https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FILEUPLOAD-213, but don't seem to have the necessary privieges. Can

Re: [fileupload] dropping ant/gump related XML descriptors

2013-03-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:16 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: BTW it all happens in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gump/metadata/project/commons-proper.xml If I understand that correctly, the Gump build is already using Maven, isn't it? Quoting: project name=commons-fileupload

Re: svn commit: r1454057 - /commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/pom.xml

2013-03-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:52 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 7 March 2013 19:52, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Author: simonetripodi Date: Thu Mar 7 19:52:39 2013 New Revision: 1454057 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1454057 Log: releng: added RC profile for staging site deployment Is

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

2013-04-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
There is nothing special. Even with alpha, or beta as part of the version number, it is technically an ASF release, and therefore subject to the full blown process and rules. On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have seen that the log4j team

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

2013-04-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
should only upgrade if they are prepared for this. In any case any release needs to go through the usual release vote process. Hen On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: There is nothing special. Even with alpha, or beta

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

2013-04-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:02 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 April 2013 09:42, Thomas Neidhart thomas.neidh...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I certainly *want* to change the API if something is broken, so I guess an alpha release would be safer. Please keep upwards compatibility to any

Re: [collections] beta release - howto

2013-05-01 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Thanks for bringing me into context, Phil. Of course, I agree with all your points. Jochen On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/29/13 5:39 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 11:02 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 April

Semantic versioning

2013-05-24 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, for those of you who don't know it, this pointer: http://semver.org/ IMO, it is what we basically do, without expressing it so well. Jochen -- That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends with the bully! Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Parent 30-RC1

2013-05-30 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 Thanks, Gary! On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Gary Gregory ggreg...@apache.org wrote: Hello All, This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 30-RC1. The main changes in this release are RAT configuration changes: - updated excludes: added .pmd and download_*.cgi - changed excludes so

Re: [DBCP] Possible strategy for multiple JDBC version support

2013-06-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:29 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: DBCP is complicated to release, because the source has to be pre-processed in order to build additional versions of the code. (unlike the rest of Java, JDBC is not generally upwards compatible). Alternative proposal (worked for me

Re: [DBCP] Possible strategy for multiple JDBC version support

2013-06-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, Jörg, On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.comwrote: This is here not possible, since we provide *implementations* that implement the affected interfaces. E.g. Statement interface has more methods which have arguments of types that are not even present

Re: [csv] Can CSV-42 be closed?

2013-08-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Procedural question: Isn't the issue itself the proper place for this discussion? On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.comwrote: WRT https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CSV-42 There is one remaining issue it seems: Added an

Re: [CHAIN][VOTE] accept the 2.0-work brach as proper codebase in /trunk

2011-09-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Housework check: - Has the package name been changed? A- Has thae Maven groupId aand/or artifactId been changed? DAOes the s On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, thanks to a user, Elijah Zupancic, that recently submitted CHAIN-53, a

Re: [math] RealVector.toArray() vs. RealVector.getData()

2011-09-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
2011/9/7 Sébastien Brisard sebastien.bris...@m4x.org: Hi, as noted in MATH-653, these two methods are redundant, and one should go. Pros and cons are * toArray() is fairly classical in the Java world * but getData() is consistent with ArrayRealVector.getDataRef(). Personnaly, my preference

Re: [ALL][VOTE] Rename Commons Sanselan to Commons Image

2011-12-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
2011/12/22 Sébastien Brisard sebastien.bris...@m4x.org: Hello, I am no native english speaker, but it seems to me that commons-imaging would suggest image analysis tools, while (as far as I know) sanselan is devoted to IO. In which case, maybe commons-imageio would be better suited? Although

Re: svn commit: r424415 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/modeler/trunk: STATUS.html project.properties

2011-12-31 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hej, Dims, you active again? That's fine! Jochen On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 8:49 PM, d...@apache.org wrote: Author: dims Date: Fri Jul 21 11:49:03 2006 New Revision: 424415 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=424415view=rev Log: fix minimum jdk version as 1.3 Modified:    

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

2012-01-18 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
As I do see that ticket, it is currently properly assigned to and waiting for Tony Stevenson. On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, pinging - do we still have chances for this or should we have a copy/paste session?

Re: [collections] retire or release?

2011-02-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Release, then retire? On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: Seeing this bug reported for the Nth time: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-371 I wonder if collections should be declared dead. It's a dumb bug, (removeAll calling retainAll),

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons as a sponsor for OGNL to join the Incubator

2011-03-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 If the project is indeed used by Struts and Tapestry (as claimed in the proposal), then I see no reason for objecting. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all PMCs, I prepared the OGNL[1] proposal to be submitted to the ASF incubator, I

Re: svn commit: r1079608 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/pom.xml

2011-03-09 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
It only means that you might have to create a Jira issue which requests Nexus permissions for the groupId commons-codec. Quite possible that this already exists. For example, I can say for sure that such permissions exist for commons-fileupload. Just try to deploy to Nexus and if you get

Re: svn commit: r1079608 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/pom.xml

2011-03-09 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it will only break things for other users without real gain. After all, what's so terrible if the group ID isn't what we'd

Re: [parent] maven 3 vs. 2 trick not inherited from commons-parent

2011-03-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Stupid question: Is there any reason for not using the 3.x site plugin with Maven 2? On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x . See

Re: svn commit: r1082084 - /commons/proper/fileupload/trunk/pom.xml

2011-03-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 10:35 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately there v18 uses a broken version of maven-assembly-plugin. 2.2.1 fixes it. I'll wait for 20. Thanks! -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)

Re: Problems with FileUpload 1.2.2

2011-03-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
that the headers issue for FileItem has been fixed, but I cannot get it to compile. I honestly know nothing about Maven, so please forgive me if this is apparent to many on the list. I see from the SVN repository that Jochen Wiedmann comitted the fix on March 16th, but how can I download

Re: [codec] Moving on to codec 2.0

2011-03-30 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 8:52 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I think that should be avoided unless the API is also being changed in an incompatible way, and then only if it really is impossible to maintain backwards compatibility. I think there are excellent reasons to change the API in

Re: Release hell WAS: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-03-30 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: There is this cool command called cp that works very well.  There is another one called tar and even one called scp ;)  If the problem is that we want to be more paranoid than we are with the mirrors for the maven

Re: [codec] Moving on to codec 2.0

2011-03-30 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: But does the API have to change, or could these additional features be supported by adding new methods and classes? Not necessarily. But my point is that codec is in a state where breaking the API will make work just easier. So why

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-03-31 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 1:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, wget alone won't do, as the files also have to be deleted. Why? There's no problem with leaving them where they are. Also, it would be best if that part of the process could be done from the users system, rather than

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-03-31 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: And then you need to check the hashes and sigs again since you are now working with downloaded copies of the files that we voted on. Seems much easier and more correct to me to just scp the files to p.a.o., let people

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-03-31 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: If they are left in Nexus staging, AFAIK they end up in Maven Central when promoted. And your point is? -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) -

Re: [codec] Moving on to codec 2.0

2011-03-31 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Julius Davies juliusdav...@gmail.com wrote: I'm confused.  We support streaming for Base64 since codec-1.4 (and now Base32 since codec-1.5).  You committed the Base64InputStream patch, Jochen! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-69 Is there other

Re: [parent] Create a test jar

2011-04-04 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
If this goes into the apache-release profile (in other words, if the test-jar is built for releases only), then I have no problems with that. On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I'd like to create a test jar for commons components

Re: [codec] Moving on to codec 2.0

2011-04-04 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: What about dropping deprecated items? That should be OK in a 2.0. I was planning on doing that today. That does not preserve drop-in reverse compatibility but we do it in major releases. First step to binary

Re: Release process WAS [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Codec 1.5-RC1

2011-04-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: Very late, but I've been a tad busy in the new-parent department. You didn't publish a POM yet, did you? ;-) What I do care about is releasing often. Which is farcical given how few times I've released. I want to

Re: [discovery] org.apache.commons.discovery.log?!?

2011-04-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: No releases, no question, no discussion on commons-logging. Lack of development on Log4J Slf4J has a rising community and active development. commons-logging imho is the wrapper for a slowly dying log4j and a not

Re: [ALL] @authors tags

2011-04-05 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote: The author information in the pom file is also redundant - it already exists in greater detail in the commit logs. 1.) Authors aren't necessarily committers. That's what the contributors section in the POM is

Re: Looking for OGNL mentors!!!

2011-04-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
AFAIK, the policy is to accept non-members as mentor #2 or #3. The requirement is that at least one member, or better two, must be present. On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Hi all guys, I'm almost ready to push the proposal on Incubator ML, the

Re: Looking for OGNL mentors!!!

2011-04-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Niall Pemberton niall.pember...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: AFAIK, the policy is to accept non-members as mentor #2 or #3. The requirement is that at least one member, or better two, must

Re: [lang] alpha package

2011-04-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com wrote: I think a separate jar would be lot less valuable - that basically makes it a separate project/branch etc. Even if we mess around in Maven to produce multiple jars, we're still create two separate artifacts simply to deal

Re: [discovery] help on last 2 open issues

2011-04-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I googled a little and

Re: [discovery] help on last 2 open issues

2011-04-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote: DISCOVERY-6: release 0.5 is targeted for Java5, I don't know if this issue is still valid - I mean, if there are Java5 implementations where ClassLoader.getResource() is not supported... I googled a little and

Re: [discovery] help on last 2 open issues

2011-04-08 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Last and least: what about DISCOVERY-11? Can we consider WONTFIX too? The bug report is not particularly clear. IMO, we should distinguish between the following cases: - The methods Service.providers throws an

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-parent 21 based on version 21-RC1

2011-04-13 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: as I notified last week, I'd like to see in the parent the missing maven3 support for scp

Re: [ALL] use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent releases in future

2011-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Another topic: Are we, as a PMC, free to allow lazy consensus? After all, this is a release in the sense of the ASF (although a very small one). I think we should query the board or at least a skilled board member before going on. I find it likely that the 3 PMC members is something that we cannot

Re: [net] binary compatibility be damned

2011-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote: * source compatibility for x.*.* Disagreed. I can quote numerous examples of application servers that come with varying versions of commons-foo, even within my employers house. Your proposal would mean that I had to create

Re: [net] binary compatibility be damned

2011-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Torsten Curdt tcu...@vafer.org wrote: Why are you using the jars from the app server would be my question. * Because I wouldn't want to modify the installation? * Because I'd like to deliver my application to customers so that they can deploy in an unmodified

Re: Release Parent Pom to dist? [was: [ALL] use lazy consensus voting for Commons Parent releases in future]

2011-04-19 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:59 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Note that Maven core is released to /dist, however AFAICT none of the plugins are released to /dist, nor is the Apache Parent Pom. So even if Commons uploads the parent pom, it won't be possible to use it without relying on Maven

Re: [release process] zip and tar.gz included in maven repo?

2011-05-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: I just realized that maybe artifacts produced by the assembly plugin should not be attached[1], WDYT? In contrary, they should, to make use of all the Maven plugins for signing etc. -- I Am What I Am And That's

Re: [release process] zip and tar.gz included in maven repo?

2011-05-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: Yes it is :( Problem is that for discovery-0.5, zip and tar.gz have been copied to be sync'ed to central repo :'( So what? I think that's perfectly fine. -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)

Re: [release process] zip and tar.gz included in maven repo?

2011-05-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org wrote: I don't think (bin|src)-(.zip|.tar.gz) should be part of Maven artifacts on central repo, having them on the distribution servers is enough I don't think doesn't count as a problem that ought to be fixed, isn't it?

Re: [POOL2] Java 1.5 or 1.6?

2011-05-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
+1 for Java 1.6 Java 1.6 is now 5 years old, Java 1.5 is officially obsolete, or even deprecated by Sun/Oracle and we should try to keep things simple. On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: Before I go too far down the road of the re-writing the core object

Re: [POOL2] Java 1.5 or 1.6?

2011-05-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:57 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: Not all OSes are supported by Sun/Oracle, and not all JVM vendors update their products as quickly. There may still be OSes that don't support Java 1.6 yet. They still have pool 1. Also, won't requiring 1.6 for Pool force DBCP

Re: [OGNL] startup questions

2011-05-11 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: I'd be inclined to keep the current package name and Maven ids during (most of) incubation. Disagreed. Changing package names etc. should be the first steps in incubation. As should be the publication of an early release with the

Re: [OGNL] startup questions

2011-05-11 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:45 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: However, if a breaking API change is needed, then the package name/Maven ids will *have* to be changed. That's not different from a new major release in commons. If you anticipate the necessity of binary changes, consider creating a

Re: [VOTE][Digester] Accept the Digester3 on Sandbox as new Digester

2011-06-09 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
I am asking because of a recent case in ws: Is the new branch expected to be binary upwards compatible or not? If it is: Is there a clirr report or something similar? If it is not: Does it change Java package name and Maven groupId and/or artifactId? Thanks, Jochen On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at

[ognl] Old sources

2011-06-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I notice that the OGNL history hasn't been preserved when importing the sources into SVN. Is the old repository still around anywhere? I'd like to look for manual changes in the parser. Jochen -- Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest

Re: [ognl] Old sources

2011-06-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
repository has got lost. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 10/giu/2011 12.06, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org ha scritto: Hello, Should be here : https://github.com/jkuhnert/ognl Thanks in advance if you can help for this javacc 2011/6/10 Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com: Hi

[ognl] Create parser dynamically

2011-06-11 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I have looked into the old OgnlParser sources. My intention was to detect the changes that have been made manually. If that would be possible, I'd basically reapply those changes to ognl.jjt, or ognl.jj and then would switch to a dynamically generated parser. Unfortunately, it is almost

Re: [OGNL] Release a new version

2011-06-11 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Sure, not a problem, but how long it will take ? Jochen ? Dunno. Ask me again in a week or so. :-) Or feel free to take the task over. -- Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men

Re: [OGNL] Release a new version

2011-06-12 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukasz.len...@googlemail.com wrote: Thanks Jochen!  I'm asking because we have a critical issue with Struts 2 build and it's already solved in OGNL ;-) If this is urgent, you should consider to put out a new release from github once more. IMO, we

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
In all honesty, Rahul: For BCEL wouldn't it be better to archive it? On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: As Jakarta winds down, we are looking for sustainable homes for couple of Java libraries -- BCEL [1] and JCS [2]. These aren't very different from

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
And now, after reading through the threads below: Same question for JCS? As I see it, you got only three replies in more than one week to such an important topic. That's not the smell of an active project? Jochen On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:28 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: It could just be that the other interested parties are on holiday, or that they agree with the move and don't feel the need to say so. May be, but it should also be noted the replies came from people like you, which are most likely

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com wrote: Considering [1], I'd say it's more relevant now than, arguably, ever. Are you sure, that's related? Reading [2], my understanding is that JCS doesn't aim to implement JSR-107, but to be close to. [2]

Re: [ALL] BCEL and JCS as Commons components?

2011-06-16 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:32 PM, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: Perhaps Proxy could use BCEL to implement ProxyFactory (or whatever it's called these days). As Thorsten wrote, they can (and perhaps even should) use ASM. The fact that a project might be used by yet another

Re: I have the opensymphony JIRA export

2011-06-20 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Drop the files somewhere on people.apache.org, and create a JIRA ticket against Infra, which requests the import. Jochen On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote: Please let me know how it should be handled. Both the JIRA xml export and the attachments. (this

Re: [VOTE] Accept BCEL and JCS as Commons components

2011-06-27 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Rahul Akolkar rahul.akol...@gmail.com wrote: This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely: 1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component 1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius) -1BCEL hasn't shown any meaningful signs of

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote: What benefits do we get by using Nexus A real lot of work saved. (Beleave me. I've been RM for the same projects with and without Nexus and it's really a difference.) -- Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-03 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: I am not so sure about that.  I guess it depends on what kind of simple scripts you are willing to use to automate things and how much you care about being certain that that things are working and you know exactly what

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-03 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing, other than that is exactly what I do and I know exactly what is going on.  I don't see any real saving, that's all and I see no need to bring in proprietary gui-based software into the mix or to wget stuff from

Re: Nexus vs rsync-repository releases

2011-08-03 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Luc Maisonobe luc.maison...@free.fr wrote: I am also worried about a closed tool like Nexus being used to publish Apache stuff. That discussion was made years ago, when Nexus was introduced. And, for the record, I strongly opposed Nexus at that time in favour of

Re: [logging] logging vs slf4j

2011-08-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Or maybe Log4j 2 could replace [logging]. If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional dependencies and is guaranteed to work

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
What is the difference between this and the digester? Why is it a new project and can't it be integrated into the existing? On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all guys As a new ASF committer, I'm setting up a new Commons Sandbox, called

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote: first of all nice to meet you :) There are not differences since mine is an extension that uses annotations to build the Digester, I proposed the sandbox because is not complete, once terminated I'll propose to

Re: New sandbox component: at-digester

2010-01-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote: very nice to meet you! I imported the digester as dependency since, fortunately, I don't have to modify the existing code, but just adding a new package that contains the new feature. Just adds to my concerns. If

Re: Future of Transaction subproject

2010-04-07 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
2010/4/7 Henri Yandell flame...@gmail.com: * Tempted to leave the SVN as is, but make it read-only; rather than do a move to dormant/. I think we should avoid changing the svn location of released components. Disagree with that point. A committer can be expected to deal with SVN moves,

Re: [ALL][COMPRESS-18] Fixing hash file syntax in Maven repo

2010-04-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure. On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:47 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the correct hashes, unfortunately the format is non-standard and is not supported by Maven or Ivy. I've made fixed

Re: [ALL][COMPRESS-18] Fixing hash file syntax in Maven repo

2010-04-26 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure. OK, will do, but Commons procedure might be different from the recommendation. The central Maven

Re: [fileupload] Proposal to not use the platform default character encoding to prevent bugs.

2010-07-04 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
2010/7/2 Eduardo Pérez Ureta edp...@gmail.com: So I suggest any of these three options: - deprecate org.apache.commons.fileupload.util.Streams.asString(java.io.InputStream pStream) that uses the platform default character encoding and deprecate not calling

Re: [VOTE] Commons Parent POM version 16

2010-07-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Jul 5, 2010, at 4:14 AM, sebb wrote: - dropped all distributionManagement overrides (to enable the Nexus I am -0 on this change. While I am certainly happy with Nexus, I don't see why Nexus removes the occasional wish to deploy to a different target. In particular deploying to a local

Re: [VOTE] Commons Parent POM version 16

2010-07-06 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 11:36 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: The repo URL can still be overridden on the command-line. Indeed this is what the new test-deploy profile does. What is the test-deploy profile? I find this neither in the proposed POM on

VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, I'd like to ask for a release of commons-fileupload 1.2.2. The proposed source and binary distributions as well as the KEYS file are here: http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload The proposed site is here: http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload/site The list of changes:

Re: [Digester] Updating POM metadata

2010-07-21 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Simone Tripodi simone.trip...@gmail.com wrote: * the parent POM is still referenced at version 15; * the groupId is still commons-digester and not yet org.apache.commons. Should that data be modified? Change the parent POM: Yes. Change the groupId: Most

[RESULT] Release Commons Fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-29 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
The vote has passed with six positive votes (Oliver Heger, Phil Steitz, Henri Yandell, Jörg Schaible, sebb, Jochen Wiedmann) and no others. I'll proceed with publishing the relases. Thanks, Jochen -- Germanys national anthem is the most boring in the world - how telling

Re: Site update?

2010-08-02 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Sent to the wrong commons, now querying the right one ... On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have updated /www/commons.apache.org/fileupload almost 8 hours ago, but http://commons.apache.org/fileupload is still showing the old page. Am I

Re: Site update?

2010-08-03 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Ping? On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Sent to the wrong commons, now querying the right one ... On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have updated /www/commons.apache.org/fileupload almost

  1   2   3   4   5   >