[VFS] Review for PR-30

https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/30 Any chance getting some eyes on this?

Re: [io] Black Duck apparently sees vulnerability in 2.5

I believe all security related issues and vulnerabilities need to be handled privately by the PMC for the project. Has this issue gone through he PMC? On May 16, 2018 at 10:50:21, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org) wrote: On Wed, 16 May 2018 07:33:54 -0700, Otto Fowler wrote

Re: [io] Black Duck apparently sees vulnerability in 2.5

Is there a PMC for IO? On May 16, 2018 at 02:24:44, Stefan Bodewig (bode...@apache.org) wrote: Hi all https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-559 says BlackDuck would call IO 2.5 vulnerable because of this issue - so far I've not been able to verify this claim. I guess it is because of IO-556

Re: [VFS] Review for PR-30

https://travis-ci.org/apache/commons-vfs/jobs/342781180 On May 15, 2018 at 13:44:25, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hopefully I can take a look this week. Do all tests pass? Like 'mvn clean test'. Gary On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:44 AM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

://bintray.com/palindromicity/stackwatch/stackwatch/0.0.1 https://github.com/palindromicity/stackwatch On April 23, 2018 at 08:16:46, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org) wrote: On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 04:54:21 -0700, Otto Fowler wrote: > Bump More than a vote, you need someone to t

Re: Hello and possible addition

Just to check, Java 7 is the required language level? On January 3, 2018 at 07:12:03, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: While working on adding some timing functionality to a Metron feature, I came across the Stopwatch <https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Release Plugin 1.0 base on RC1

Do you have a page with the verification steps and requirements? On January 16, 2018 at 11:59:34, Rob Tompkins (chtom...@gmail.com) wrote: Curious if anyone else wants to weigh in? > On Jan 16, 2018, at 6:55 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > > +1 (Binding) > > (While I might

Re: [LANG] Github PR reviews

, 2018 at 6:05 AM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I see that github notices don’t get sent to this list, is there a procedure > to get a pr review? > Asking for a friend ;) > > O >

Re: [imaging] IMAGING-154 remove Debug class

Maybe Debug should be an interface ( perhaps with the current class as the default implementation ) and be passed in optionally? On February 5, 2018 at 07:21:11, Bruno P. Kinoshita ( brunodepau...@yahoo.com.br.invalid) wrote: Hello, If memory serves me well, some time ago we had a discussion

[VFS][LANG] Jira rights

I would like to assign the jiras for my PR’s to myself. And I pleased be given contributor rights to LANG and VFS? Thanks.

Re: [VFS][LANG] Jira rights

...@gmail.com) wrote: Just post the tickets you want assigned to yourself here. Someone with Jira rights will follow up or I will next time I sit at my PC. WRT commit rights, we usually wait and evaluate for a contribution history. Cheers! Gary On Feb 17, 2018 09:55, "Otto Fowler" <ottobackwa

[VFS] trunk build failing in travis

I have forked VFS and tried to build it in my personal travis, and it is failing. https://travis-ci.org/ottobackwards/commons-vfs/builds/341963824 It also fails testing locally as well. Is this expected? I can’t get the the apache/commons-vfs travis site to check if it is building there. ottO

Re: [VFS] trunk build failing in travis

It is also failed on github On February 15, 2018 at 11:59:22, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: I have forked VFS and tried to build it in my personal travis, and it is failing. https://travis-ci.org/ottobackwards/commons-vfs/builds/341963824 It also fails testing locally as well

Re: [VFS][LANG] Jira rights

February 2018 at 12:09, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am familiar with the differences between a contributor or a committer > both in the foundation and jira. > I would like _contributor_ rights, not commit rights. > In what context? You already have commit rights if

Re: [VFS][LANG] Jira rights

imagine this to be different across projects. On February 19, 2018 at 09:34:28, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: As I stated in my original mail. I would like to assign the Jiras for the issues I create and will be submitting Pull Requests for or for the issues that I didn’t create

Re: [VFS][LANG] Jira rights

as well which works normally. On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 08:41, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I hate to say “on my project”, but I will. > > My understanding, from my experience on my project (Apache Metron) is that > PMC members have jira rights wi

Re: [VFS] trunk build failing in travis

. I suspect that maven clean in the toplevel project cures some of them — sometimes. Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net -- *From:* Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> *Sent:* Friday, February 16, 2018 8:18:44 PM *To:* Gary Gregory; Commons Developers Li

Re: [VFS] trunk build failing in travis

re > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 > OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" > > Gary > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Re: [VFS] trunk build failing in travis

And only fails java8, which is what i’m using local On February 16, 2018 at 14:26:10, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: https://travis-ci.org/ottobackwards/commons-vfs/builds/342485419 So this builds locally with mvn clean package, but fails in travis, anyone familiar? On February

Re: [VFS] trunk build failing in travis

Any ideas on this? Even with the old pom, I’m seeing failures I cannot explain. I have a couple of PR’s I think I’d like to submit, but building seems a bit of mess. On February 15, 2018 at 22:03:06, Bernd Eckenfels (e...@zusammenkunft.net) wrote: Hello, I digged a bit deeper, and on my

[VFS] commons-parent 43 breaks VFS build : (was) trunk build failing in travis

So, It looks like upgrading the parent pom from #42 to #43 broke the build. This can be seen in the travis build history, and I have checked that mvn clean verify works with 42 and fails with 43. On February 15, 2018 at 12:07:45, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: It is also failed

Re: [text] Upper/Lower case enum

What problem does it solve? On February 22, 2018 at 17:02:34, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Does anyone think this is useful and general enough to add to Commons Text: /** * Enumerates letter cases and converts strings. * * @author mailto:ggreg...@rocketsoftware.com;>Gary Gregory

Re: [LANG] question on Validate

Yeah, I found it. Sorry. On February 23, 2018 at 09:42:12, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: I just noticed the Validate class, and was wondering if I should be using it in my pr, but I have checks for StringUtils.isBlank() not just null… Would it make sense for Validate to have

Re: [VFS][LANG] Jira rights

Thanks! On February 19, 2018 at 14:14:11, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org) wrote: On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:48:34 -0600, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 17 February 2018 at 12:09, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am familiar with the differences

[LANG] question on Validate

I just noticed the Validate class, and was wondering if I should be using it in my pr, but I have checks for StringUtils.isBlank() not just null… Would it make sense for Validate to have check methods corresponding to blank and empty? ottO

Hello and possible addition

Hello Commons, My name is Otto Fowler ( ottobackwards on github, otto -AT- apache.org at apache ), and I’m a PMC member of the Apache Metron <https://metron.apache.org> project. While working on adding some timing functionality to a Metron feature, I came across the Stopwatch

[LANG] Re: Hello and possible addition

Sorry, didn’t put the right prefix. On January 1, 2018 at 22:28:45, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello Commons, My name is Otto Fowler ( ottobackwards on github, otto -AT- apache.org at apache ), and I’m a PMC member of the Apache Metron <https://metron.apache.org> p

Re: Hello and possible addition

Thanks, I will definitely do a PR and get a review. I am sure review will make it better. On January 3, 2018 at 02:06:37, Benedikt Ritter (brit...@apache.org) wrote: Hello Otto, > Am 02.01.2018 um 04:28 schrieb Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>: > > Hello Commons, >

Re: Hello and possible addition

https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/311 On January 3, 2018 at 09:05:37, Benedikt Ritter (brit...@apache.org) wrote: > Am 03.01.2018 um 15:02 schrieb Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>: > > Just to check, Java 7 is the required language level? Yes > > > On

[LANG] Github PR reviews

I see that github notices don’t get sent to this list, is there a procedure to get a pr review? Asking for a friend ;) O

Re: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests

think I had fixed a few for WebDav back in the days. Gruss Bernd Von: Otto Fowler Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 13:41 An: Commons Developers List Betreff: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type ( or VIRTUAL un

Re: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests

FileType normalisePath In UriParser is an issue as well, trying to derive a FOLDER or FILE by the name doesn’t work if the system is FILE_OR_FOLDER…. On March 6, 2018 at 15:17:50, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: protected void addBaseTests() throws Exception { addTests

[LANG] travis build failures

My PR is currently failing for java 9 on this test. Anyone have any idea why? [INFO] Running org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtilsTest [ERROR] Tests run: 307, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.114 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.lang3.ArrayUtilsTest [ERROR]

Re: [LANG] travis build failures

Note, this does pass in my personal travis: https://travis-ci.org/ottobackwards/commons-lang/builds/346806991 On February 27, 2018 at 11:58:24, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: My PR is currently failing for java 9 on this test. Anyone have any idea why? [INFO] Running

Re: [email] Jenkins not building

Does this mean anything "Jenkins needs Java 7 for Maven jobs] Using -Pjava-1.6 JAVA_1_6_HOME is defined by the job, so may be incorrect for some hosts Solution TBA” On February 28, 2018 at 18:03:08, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Can't figure out why:

Re: Github usage

ing. > > On 14 March 2018 at 10:19, Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:16:42 +, Otto Fowler wrote: >> >>> I should be more specific, this is for looking at github pr’s. >>> So if your submitters are forkin

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

less I'm mistaken)... Best, Gilles > Gary > > On Mar 8, 2018 08:58, "Otto Fowler" <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So, could think about commons-misc or something? > I don’t think we are going to come up with a perfect module for these > things. >

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

, Otto Fowler wrote: > I think bringing back commons-monitoring/sirota would only be > possible if > it were to be modular enough that you could bring in the ‘core’ > classes > without needing to bring in all of what sirota ended up being, which > was an > end to end solution.

Re: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests

FILE_OR_FOLDER just doesn’t seem to be supported in the system completely. Does anyone remember when it came about and why? On March 7, 2018 at 17:41:56, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: FileType normalisePath In UriParser is an issue as well, trying to derive a FOLDER or FILE

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

So, could think about commons-misc or something? I don’t think we are going to come up with a perfect module for these things. Maybe the way it can work is: commons-misc exists. It is the landing place for things that seem to be outside the scope of commons-, but don’t justify a new module

Re: [All] GitHub partial update

You should open an INFRA ticket On March 6, 2018 at 09:12:41, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org) wrote: > Hi. > > It seems there are glitches with the mirroring (?). > > The current version of this file (on GitHub) > > >

Re: Github usage Was: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

We have script to help reviewers checkout PR’s in git, either in their own repo or just doing it in ~/tmp or something into a new repo. So, I would run: > checkout-pr 999 in the tmp directory, and end up with a local version that I can then build and do whatever with. would that help? On

Re: Github usage Was: [Statistics] Port codes from Commons Math

I should be more specific, this is for looking at github pr’s. So if your submitters are forking, submitting prs on github. We also have scripts for committing, but we are doing git -> github mirror On March 14, 2018 at 10:15:04, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: We have scr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Build Plugin 1.8 Released

Congratulations! On April 6, 2018 at 08:10:55, Rob Tompkins (chtom...@apache.org) wrote: [Not cross posted to @announce since this is internal to Commons] Apache Commons has released the Apache Commons Build Plugin 1.8. The Apache Commons Build Plugin is a Maven Plugin which can be used by

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

There has been no comment, do we need an explicit vote? On April 3, 2018 at 09:27:56, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: So do we need a vote? What is next to move this forward? On March 28, 2018 at 14:51:55, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: OK, sounds fine to me

[VFS] -> a couple of questions

Is there committer’s guide for VFS ( or any svn based project ) and working with github PR’s? Who can review the PRs and +1 them to commit? If some of these PR *did* actually land, who would do the release? It seems that VFS is in a ‘maintenance’ state, is that true and official? Thanks. ottO

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

Bump On April 9, 2018 at 08:53:13, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: There has been no comment, do we need an explicit vote? On April 3, 2018 at 09:27:56, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: So do we need a vote? What is next to move this forward? On March 28, 2018

Re: [JIRA] Need committer privileges for JIRA

It is actually contributor, not committer rights you require. On April 24, 2018 at 08:34:16, Eric Barnhill (ericbarnh...@gmail.com) wrote: I appear to be lacking appropriate committer privileges in the Apache commons JIRA. I can close and resolve my own issues but not those of others. Can

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

OK, sounds fine to me. Hopefully we’ll get some buy in and can move forward. I’m not sure what is next though ;) On March 28, 2018 at 13:17:22, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > How abou

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

to a lambda not worthing any lib/dep in apps - just my opinion indeed. For circuit breaker: geronimo safeguard can be interested in hosting that utility part and drop failsafe dependency. Maybe something to discuss in another thread. Le 20 mars 2018 23:27, "Otto Fowler" <ottobackwa

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

So do we need a vote? What is next to move this forward? On March 28, 2018 at 14:51:55, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: OK, sounds fine to me. Hopefully we’ll get some buy in and can move forward. I’m not sure what is next though ;) On March 28, 2018 at 13:17:22, Gary Gregory

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

Sirona is gone, it is a closed incubator project. Romain has forked it to his own repo. On March 20, 2018 at 18:24:06, Gilles (gil...@harfang.homelinux.org) wrote: On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:00:41 -0700, Otto Fowler wrote: > If monitoring was started a new, and not re-viving the old > moni

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

<gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> a écrit : >> >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:13:39 +0100, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> 2018-03-15 14:36 GMT+01:00 Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> If we can come to consensus on the way forward, I’ll be hap

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

-related, or not (e.g. a circuit breaker for memory size). So probably commons-timing could be a good place for StopWatch, but maybe not for circuit-breaker. But I think both could be under commons-monitoring perhaps? From: Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> To: Romain Manni-Bucau <

Re: [VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests

Anybody from VFS-past around? On March 8, 2018 at 23:55:54, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:54 AM, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > FILE_OR_FOLDER just doesn’t seem to be supported in the system completely. > Does anyone remember

[VFS] Is there any documentation on creating a new provider?

Is there any documentation on what is required for creating support for a new filesystem? Or would anyone recommend an existing one in common or sandbox that is a good simple example? Thanks ottO

Re: [VFS] Is there any documentation on creating a new provider?

Thanks Hasan, I did read the API doc, but that is more towards using a filesystem, I’m thinking about creating a new provider. On March 5, 2018 at 12:28:41, Hasan Diwan (hasan.di...@gmail.com) wrote: Otto, On 5 March 2018 at 07:53, Otto Fowler <ottobackwa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is

[DISCUSS] new component for timing?

Hi, In the course of working through my pull request for adding new LANG functionality on top of the StopWatch class, the issue has been raise as to if this functionality is ‘common’ or should be placed in a more specialized commons- component. We would like to take the discussion to the

Re: [LANG] travis build failures

ay >> > > > will be equal to the original array, and thus the test will >> fail. >> This >> > > > chance is higher for the testShuffleBoolean case where the >> array >> > contains >> > > > ten elements, but only two distinct

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-03-02 14:45 GMT+01:00

Re: [DISCUSS] new component for timing?

; | Old Blog >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>> >>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-developmen

[VFS] FILE_OR_FOLDER breaking tests

If you have a filesystem, where everything could be a FILE_OR_FOLDER type ( or VIRTUAL until attached ), then it seems like you need to replace some of the testcases in the provider suites, since they assume or check for FILE and FOLDER explicitly. I guess my question is, are the tests as they

Re: [VFS] Java 8

+1 On November 3, 2018 at 10:55:08, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: I propose we update the Java requirement for [vfs] from Java 7 to Java 8. Gary

Re: [VFS] Breaking BC in provider

Can you start over? :) On January 17, 2019 at 13:33:49, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: With SVN trunk, Clirr currently reports:

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Move all proper svn repos to gitbox

+1 On January 8, 2019 at 11:33:48, Rob Tompkins (chtom...@gmail.com) wrote: Vote statement: "I propose we move all ‘proper' svn repos to gitbox." I went though, and I think these are the ones that need to be migrated: bcel/ beanutils/ bsf/ chain/ codec/ commons-parent/ commons-skin (???)

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report January 2019

That works, thanks On January 11, 2019 at 10:03:13, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:46 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > I would qualify that releases and jira addressing are timely for some > components, but not all. > Rephrasing to: " - We

Re: [DRAFT] Board Report January 2019

I would qualify that releases and jira addressing are timely for some components, but not all. On January 11, 2019 at 09:05:17, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: I will post this to the board tomorrow morning. Feedback welcome. --- ## Description: - Apache Commons is an Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Distribution 2.3 based on RC1

Builds clean for me, running `mvn clean install` on the downloaded and extracted source. [INFO] [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Commons VFS Project 2.3: [INFO] [INFO] Apache Commons VFS Project .

Re: [VOTE] Redirect github notifications to issues@

+1 On February 20, 2019 at 08:41:15, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Is this a LAZY VOTE? Gary On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 7:36 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > +1 > > (Note. We still need to have the github messages either land on an email > list or generate jira’s for traceability. I

Re: [Parent] RAT check

Maybe put it in a profile, and you can document that that profile will be used to check _and_ run that profile for the travis builds, such that a failed travis build will show that the pr is invalid. On March 12, 2019 at 09:39:44, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Mon, Mar 11,

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons VFS 2.3

nal" dependencies. Thanks to Arnaud MERGEY. o VFS-657: FileSelector implementations like FileDepthSelector should throw Exception. Thanks to Elias Putz. o VFS-614: MonitorInputStream should not close the stream in read(). Thanks to Boris Petrov, Otto Fowler. o VF

Re: [All][Math] No ML, no JIRA; GitHub only?

You can create a github PR template in the repository that has instructions on what you expect for the PRs. This would hopefully include things like: is there a jira? does the title have the jira in it? have your run `foo` command to test and verify there are no errors etc:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS 2.3 based on RC2

+1 downloaded src/binary validated signatures built and ran tests and site looked at site. Some of the jira issues listed for this release are resolved not closed. On February 1, 2019 at 12:36:18, Gary Gregory (ggreg...@apache.org) wrote: We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some

Re: [VFS] Tests fail on Java 11

I have not done java 11 work before, but I would like to help On February 4, 2019 at 17:29:38, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Now that 2.3 is done, I'd like some help to get the build running on Java 11, which currently fails in the tests:

[VFS] unable to commit

I’m trying to commit an update to the .gitignore ( PR#50), but it is failing: > git push upstream master Counting objects: 3, done. Delta compression using up to 8 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 404 bytes | 404.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 1),

Re: [VFS] unable to commit

I’m talking to infra, it is possible that INFRA-17724 didn’t set something correctly On February 5, 2019 at 09:05:54, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote: I’m trying to commit an update to the .gitignore ( PR#50), but it is failing: > git push upstream master Counting objects: 3, d

Re: [All] Alpha/beta releases

On June 5, 2019 at 12:16:33, Gilles Sadowski (gillese...@gmail.com) wrote: Le mer. 5 juin 2019 à 17:57, James Carman a écrit : > > I’m having a hard time understanding the comparing APIs use case. If I > were to want to try that, I’d create a branch and import the new dependency > version and

Re: [VFS] Deleting the git branch 'trunk'

+1 On April 29, 2019 at 08:01:43, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: I am going to delete the branch 'trunk'. It's too confusing. Gary

Re: [VFS] Deleting the git branch 'trunk'

BTW, I had deleted the branch locally OK with 'git branch -d trunk' Gary > > Gary > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:11 AM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> +1 >> >> > On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:58 AM, Otto Fowler >> wrote: >> > >> > +1 >> > &g

Re: [VFS] Exceptions in new file filter code

Where these written to be used as lambdas? On April 19, 2019 at 10:07:28, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi All: In our new file filters ported from Commons IO, we have code like: } catch (final FileSystemException ex) { throw new RuntimeException(ex); } I propose instead that

Re: [VFS] Exceptions in new file filter code

+1 then, from looking at the code, I don’t see why RuntimeException would be required there. On April 19, 2019 at 12:38:02, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > Where these written to be used as lambdas? > The

Re: [All] Help with GitHub "support"

You could add a PR template to github, and put a big banner in there that says something like that. On May 2, 2019 at 11:54:34, Eric Barnhill (ericbarnh...@gmail.com) wrote: I am happy to review PRs and approve merges as well, it's become part of my daily routine at work to use GitHub in this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.4 based on RC1

+1 thanks Gary for keeping the VFS momentum up. On July 16, 2019 at 07:20:20, Gary Gregory (garydgreg...@gmail.com) wrote: May we have more (binding) VOTE(s) please? Gary On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, 12:27 Gary Gregory wrote: > We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.4.1 based on RC1

same thing fly by for me but I am not going to worry about it for this site for now. Gary On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:50 AM Otto Fowler wrote: > I have had this build pass twice, running > > mvn -V clean install site -P japicmp > > Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons VFS Project 2.4.1 based on RC1

I have had this build pass twice, running mvn -V clean install site -P japicmp Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555; 2019-04-04T15:00:29-04:00) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec Java version: 1.8.0_171, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:

[VFS] error running mvn site

I’m running `mvn site` on a PR I’ve authored, and i get an error unrelated to my changes. Has anyone else seen this? ```bash *INFO*] ** [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Commons VFS Project 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT:* [*INFO*]