On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:56:47 +0100, sebb wrote:
On 9 August 2017 at 03:57, Gilles
wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:49:44 -0700, Chas Honton wrote:
Since most of us work in an IDE, the "wasted" time of checkstyle
for
every build is negligible.
IDEs vary in how easy it is to set up the checks to
On 9 August 2017 at 03:57, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:49:44 -0700, Chas Honton wrote:
>>
>> Since most of us work in an IDE, the "wasted" time of checkstyle for
>> every build is negligible.
IDEs vary in how easy it is to set up the checks to agree with the
project settings.
And IDEs v
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 18:49:44 -0700, Chas Honton wrote:
Since most of us work in an IDE, the "wasted" time of checkstyle for
every build is negligible.
It's not just the wasted time of running the tool (which might
well be negligible), it's the forcing of e.g. documenting a code
that might turn o
Since most of us work in an IDE, the "wasted" time of checkstyle for every
build is negligible. At my day job, all code is automatically reformatted as
part of the build. It's just another step along with PMD, CPD, findbugs, sonar,
jacoco, junit, and a few other static analyses. The more we auto
Hello.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 00:20:00 +0200, Karl-Philipp Richter wrote:
Hi,
Am 07.08.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Gilles:
Less work for the maintainers is good. :-)
By "taking time" I meant that validating should not be enforced when
calling "mvn compile" or "mvn test".
I wouldn't worry about the tim
Hi,
Am 07.08.2017 um 15:09 schrieb Gilles:
> Less work for the maintainers is good. :-)
>
> By "taking time" I meant that validating should not be enforced when
> calling "mvn compile" or "mvn test".
I wouldn't worry about the time consumption of the validation even if
it's run by every dev befor
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:49:16 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Gilles
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
We had a simil
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>>>
>>> We had a similar discussion about Configuration.
>
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 14:08:45 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
Hello.
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
We had a similar discussion about Configuration.
Personally, I'm all for enforcing checkstyle during the validate
phase,
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 21:17:43 +0300, Allon Mureinik wrote:
>
>> We had a similar discussion about Configuration.
>>
>> Personally, I'm all for enforcing checkstyle during the validate phase,
>> but
>> we couldn't reach a consensus about it
10 matches
Mail list logo
