I can't say it's a convention, it's just the pattern I've been following.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022, 14:59 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
> If not, I'd prefer to wait for the next release since "2.8" is
> consistent with
Hello.
Le mer. 22 juin 2022 à 20:59, Matt Juntunen
a écrit :
>
> Gary,
>
> I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
Although Gary's suggestion would be a slight improvement, most
of the components indeed do not follow that convention.
This is the kind of common
Gary,
I was unaware of this. Is this a new convention that we've decided on?
If not, I'd prefer to wait for the next release since "2.8" is
consistent with previous commons-configuration releases and the vote
has already started on rc2.
Regards,
Matt J
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:45 AM Gary
Please use 2.8.0, I've been using the 3 part version format for all recent
releases. I think it would be nice to follow this naming here.
Gary
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, 22:30 Matt Juntunen wrote:
> Thanks, Bruno! I'm going to go ahead and cancel this vote so I can fix
> the README. I also noticed
