Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Charles Honton wrote: > There are multiple causes to LANG-1265. The two I have traced look like > incomplete locale/timezone data from the CLDR provider. I recommend > moving forward on 3.5 release without solving LANG-1265. > > I agree with Chas here, that Sim

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

+1 Am 27.09.2016 um 07:36 schrieb Charles Honton: There are multiple causes to LANG-1265. The two I have traced look like incomplete locale/timezone data from the CLDR provider. I recommend moving forward on 3.5 release without solving LANG-1265. chas On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Benedi

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

There are multiple causes to LANG-1265. The two I have traced look like incomplete locale/timezone data from the CLDR provider. I recommend moving forward on 3.5 release without solving LANG-1265. chas >> On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> as you migh

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

I'll dig in and have a look at it. -Rob > On Sep 26, 2016, at 10:29 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi all, > > as you might have noticed, there has been no RC1 on Saturday :-) I've > decided that I'd like to fix LANG-1265 [1] for 3.5 to have full Java 9 > support. If anybody has some cycles t

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hi all, as you might have noticed, there has been no RC1 on Saturday :-) I've decided that I'd like to fix LANG-1265 [1] for 3.5 to have full Java 9 support. If anybody has some cycles to work on this issue, that would be appreciated. Thank you! Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hi, just wanted to give you an update. I have the day of on Saturday and I will prepare 3.5 RC1 then. So now is your last chance to get your stuff into this release :-) Regards, Benedikt Gary Gregory schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 19:55 Uhr: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Benedikt Ritter

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello again, > > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um > 15:44 Uhr: > > > Hi, > > > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > > ready to be shipped with 3.5. > > > > Furthermore we need to fix L

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hello again, Benedikt Ritter schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 15:44 Uhr: > Hi, > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > ready to be shipped with 3.5. > Furthermore we need to fix LANG-1264 [2] IMHO. Benedikt [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-12

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

RERO! Gary On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not > ready to be shipped with 3.5. > > Regards, > Benedikt > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1134 > > Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Sa.

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hi, please share your thoughts about LANG-1134 [1]. I argue that it is not ready to be shipped with 3.5. Regards, Benedikt [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1134 Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Sa., 10. Sep. 2016 um 20:59 Uhr: > Hi, > > I'm going to start preparation for release 3.5 t

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Hello Pascal, Pascal Schumacher schrieb am So., 11. Sep. 2016 um 10:31 Uhr: > Great news. :) Thanks a lot! > > What about the these two issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1201 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1227 > > The code was checked in, but in the discussion

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Great news. :) Thanks a lot! What about the these two issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1201 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1227 The code was checked in, but in the discussion people disagreed wether it was ready to ship. Am 10.09.2016 um 20:59 schrieb Benedikt R

Re: [LANG] Towards 3.5

Cool beans! On Sep 10, 2016 11:59 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to start preparation for release 3.5 tomorrow. If there is > anything you like to have included, please fix it now. > > Regards, > Benedikt >