On 15 September 2016 at 12:06, Stian Soiland-Reyes <st...@apache.org> wrote: > [[ Cross-posting - let's try to reply to dev@commons. ]]
> b) Move RDFParserBuilder to package org.apache.commonsrdf.experimental > or similar (allowing us to fully change it for the next version) > c) Same as b) - but also move RDFParserBuilder implementations to e.g. > org.apache.commonsrdf.jena.experimental > e) Remove RDFParserBuilder.rdfTermFactory() These are my proposed changes - I'll go ahead on these unless I hear otherwise :) Commons folks - is the use of a ".experimental" sub-package (and appropriate Javadoc) OK? Suggested javadoc: package org.commons.rdf.api.experimental; /** * ... * <p> * NOTE: This interface/class is currently marked as <strong>experimental</strong>, * meaning that it might change or be removed in the next minor version. */ public interface RDFParserBuilder { // ... } I'm not proposing we go all Guava style with lots of experimental annotations (and the well known incompatibility issues following), just for this 0.3.0-incubating version - so we can decide later on the final form of that interface for the following (hopefully 1.0.0) version under Commons proper. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org