potiuk commented on PR #14:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/14#issuecomment-1961924471
> I'm not sure I agree. We have a Security committee, and they are the
correct people to handled security issues. I'm not at all sure they want
passionate amateurs trying
rbowen merged PR #13:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/13
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rbowen commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501153319
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
rbowen commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501152118
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
rbowen merged PR #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/17
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk opened a new pull request, #18:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18
This PR adds quite a bit of clarity on how the process of initiating (and
ending) the relationship between the Advispr and PMC is expected to happen.
It's more on a FAQ rather than rules,
rbowen commented on PR #14:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/14#issuecomment-1961883753
I'm not sure I agree. We have a Security committee, and they are the correct
people to handled security issues. I'm not at all sure they want passionate
amateurs trying to do
rbowen merged PR #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/15
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk opened a new pull request, #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/12
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
rbowen merged PR #12:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/12
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501154060
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501174824
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk opened a new pull request, #15:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/15
Many of us use different IDEs. I use VIm and IntelliJ interchangeably, for
editing markdown files I find IntelliJ rather helpful with preview and Intellij
creates .idea folder which can be
potiuk opened a new pull request, #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/17
This is something I wanted to proposed from the beginnig of seing the
Sharpenes apporach. I believe the original approach where Advisors just advise
the projects their join - and the flow is
potiuk opened a new pull request, #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16
I would like to propose the "why" folder, where we will keep a (very) short
summary about some of the rules and policies that we will be - as Advisors -
discussing with the projects we will
potiuk commented on PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1961978300
> Interesting idea. Yeah, I like this. It also gives us something to point
to when projects push back, in a "this isn't personal, it's just the way things
are" kind of way.
rbowen commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501186272
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501200329
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk opened a new pull request, #13:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/13
Seems that Advisor is the result of all the discussions that happened - this
is one place where it has not been updated.
I also removed the section about "Why the name" - because
potiuk opened a new pull request, #14:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/14
The security issue handling is an important aspects and one that all
projects should have very good policies and processes about, so I think we
shoudl add it here.
--
This is an automated
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501153331
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501173776
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
justinmclean commented on PR #14:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/14#issuecomment-1962180930
Projects often need to be pointed in the right direction for the correct
process when a security issue arises. I can see an Advisor doing that.
--
This is an automated
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501326585
##
wg-advisors/red-flags.md:
##
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules.
* Has a website external to apache.org
* Is missing reports
* Is
justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501297317
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 00:53, justinmclean (via GitHub) wrote:
>
>
> justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
> URL:
> https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501297317
>
>
> ##
> wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
> ##
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +#
tisonkun commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501327566
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501296133
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well
HI,
> An implicit +1 from the RM is not something that should be encouraged.
I agree, but some projects still do it.
> Also the minimum length of time for voting is 72 hours, except for
> urgent security-related releases.
A few projects have longer times for voting, so they still fit within
tisonkun commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501329155
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
rbowen commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501228575
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
tisonkun commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501327362
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ the indulgence of the PMC, advisor. Do not abuse this
relationship.
## FAQ
+## How to become an
tisonkun commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501328880
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
tisonkun commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501328950
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
potiuk commented on code in PR #18:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501285983
##
wg-advisors/README.md:
##
@@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know
all members
personally, but each member was
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501325628
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501325488
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
All,
It isn't looking good. Redbubble have denied the suspension appeal and
still haven't explained why the account has been suspended. I've asked
but I am not sure I am going to get a response.
I think we need to start looking for alternative services.
Suggestions welcome.
I haven't
sebbASF commented on PR #146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961033402
It's very difficult to review the PR, as it appears to have a lot of
unrelated changes.
It would be better to make separate changes in separate commits, otherwise
the history is
Hi,
I have a query about the GitHub statistics that are being generated the Lucene
project [1]. They appear to be not accurate, or at least something is not quite
right with them.
For example, I (as well as many other project members) opened several issues
and PRs in Jan and Feb of 2024, but
bdelacretaz commented on PR #146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961010970
I'm planning to merge this early next week unless someone objects.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
bdelacretaz commented on PR #146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961058802
> it appears to have a lot of unrelated changes..
yes, sorry I messed up after rebasing, fixed now
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
The second half of your question: https://reporter.apache.org/about.html
Unfortunately the tool is not actively maintained at the moment. We could
certainly use some more eyes and fingers on it.
Rich
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 03:20 Chris Hegarty
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a query about the GitHub
sebbASF commented on PR #146:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/146#issuecomment-1961091696
It's better, but there are still some changes that appear to be unrelated
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
I've not had a chance to review carefully because I'm traveling but I love
the idea and am +1 to the patch in concept. Since it is replacing something
that doesn't work, I see no risk in moving forward with this. Thanks!
Rich
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024, 03:44 bdelacretaz (via GitHub) wrote:
>
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
