It's probably easier to configure the cluster with n=1 rather than change
write quorum on a per-request basis. This was the approach we took with the
PouchDB tests and it worked well (as a first step, at least).
Will
On 8 Apr 2015 20:26, Sebastian Rothbucher
sebastianrothbuc...@googlemail.com
an reduce replication costs dramatically,
> thanks.
>
> > I've gotten the +1 from Will Holley that our implementation is consistent
>> with the proposed CouchDB version
>
> Does Cloudant already has this endpoint onboard? I‘ve tried to, but failed
> – although not sure I d
Hi all,
I noticed that the docs for 1.6.1 seem to be missing. If I visit
http://docs.couchdb.org/ I get redirected to
http://docs.couchdb.org/en/1.6.1/ which seems to be the WIP 2.0 docs.
Is this intentional (I assume not)?
Will
?
>
> -Joan
>
> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "Will Holley" <willhol...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" <woh...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Friday, September 2, 2016 4:43:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: Getting librari
Assuming nothing's changed in the last few weeks, there are 2 issues
which cause the PouchDB tests to fail against master: COUCHDB-3017 and
COUCHDB-3034.
Both could be addressed in the test suite by using different database
names for each test, but that's quite a disruptive change.
On 2
2, 2016 5:15:00 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: Getting libraries to test RCs
>>>>
>>>> Hi Will,
>>>>
>>>> Neither of these are currently tagged as blocking issues for CouchDB
>>>> 2.0, only major priority. If you want to flag them as such, thi
Ah. 2.1.1 has a bug in /_explain when a sort is specified
(https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/1025).
That said, the 2.1.0 output looks broken - it's not using an index on
"test" so can't be sorting. Were the results actually sorted?
On 9 May 2018 at 09:27, GitBox wrote:
>
Thanks for kicking this off Garren! I have a few questions / thoughts:
1. Will these indexes continue to have associated design documents? I
assume this aspect wouldn't change, but it would be good to be explicit.
Aside from being required for replication, it's useful to be able to query
the
Thanks Garren,
As usual, a few questions :)
1. The data model suggests the idea of view groups gets carried over to
fdb. Are there API / behaviour reasons to keep them? Would an index update
transaction scope to a view group rather than a single view?
2. Regarding emitting doc as the value in a
I defer to those with more operational experience of ken and smoosh but
wouldn't those new subsystems radically impact performance if IOQ is
completely bypassed (assuming ken/smoosh are enabled by default)?
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 22:04, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> A few months ago a bunch of code
>From an operational pov, the compaction daemon was removed in favour of
smoosh [1]. We owe some documentation around these new subsystems (smoosh,
ioq, ken) and some guides covering common cases (only compact during quiet
periods, disable compaction, etc) to aid migration.
[1]
Hi all,
CouchDB has a mature Helm chart at
https://github.com/helm/charts/tree/master/stable/couchdb to facilitate
deploying CouchDB clusters to Kubernetes. Historically, Helm charts have
been curated by the Helm team alongside a list of chart-specific
maintainers (@kocolosk in this case).
The
ers if ASF would want to host a repository to which all
> projects could contribute but I don’t personally feel like spending the
> cycles to find out :) I’m quite ok with CouchDB hosting its own.
>
> Adam
>
> > On Sep 26, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Will Holley wrote:
> >
>
>Hi all,
>
>CouchDB has a mature Helm chart at
https://github.com/helm/charts/tree/master/stable/couchdb >to facilitate
deploying CouchDB clusters to Kubernetes. Historically, Helm charts have
been >curated by the Helm team alongside a list of chart-specific
maintainers (@kocolosk in this case).
>
+1: 5
+0: 0
-1: 0
Thanks all - vote passes. I'll aim to start the migration this week.
Cheers,
Will
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 at 18:25, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> +1 thanks Will
>
> > On Oct 8, 2019, at 9:31 AM, Will Holley wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Hi all,
+1 make check passing on Centos 7, tested both amd64 and ppc64le. I'm going
to try on Centos 8 next...
One thing I noticed is that the Unix install instructions look outdated
with respect to Erlang / Node / Python dependencies though I'm not 100%
sure what the supported options are now.
On
also verified make check passes on CentOS 8 with SM60 using the standard
mozjs60/mozjs60-devel packages. Tested amd64 and ppc64le.
I also ran some basic clouseau tests which ran fine.
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 10:47, Will Holley wrote:
> +1 make check passing on Centos 7, tested both am
Thanks Joan for highlighting the problem; the image has been removed from
DockerHub.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 17:46, Joan Touzet wrote:
> On 2020-02-03 12:34, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> > Thanks Joan for raising this,
> >
> > I’m throwing in an extra “this is bad” because of the version number.
> 3.0
Some of our internal teams reported that the cluster seedlist function is
broken in RC1. I was able to reproduce and filed
https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 to track.
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 01:23, Joan Touzet wrote:
> On 2020-02-14 5:49 p.m., Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > On Fri, 14
For running in a container, you could also try using the Red Hat UBI
instead of CentOS. There is a ubi-init variant which runs systemd (see
Broadly, I think it's a big step forward if we can prevent Mango from
automatically selecting extremely stale indexes.
I've been going back and forth on whether step 3 could lead to some
difficult-to-predict behaviour. If we assume that requests have a short
timeout - e.g. we can't return any
AM Will Holley wrote:
>
> > Broadly, I think it's a big step forward if we can prevent Mango from
> > automatically selecting extremely stale indexes.
> >
> > I've been going back and forth on whether step 3 could lead to some
> > difficult-to-predict behaviour. If
Environment:
RHEL 8
Elixir: 1.9.1
Erlang: 20.3.8.25
CPU Architectures: amd64, ppc64le, s390x
Sig: ok
Checksums: ok
Configure, make & make check: ok
Build release, add admin & start: ok
Used Fauxton to:
- configure cluster: ok
- verify install: ok
- create dbs: ok
- create docs: ok
Congrats Glynn!
On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 17:29, Joshua Mintz wrote:
> Congrats, Glynn!
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:23 PM Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Glynn! :)
> >
> > > On 14. Sep 2020, at 18:22, Michelle P wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Dear community,
> > >
> > > I am delighted to
Thanks Peng Hui, Garren. I can definitely see value in having metrics
exposed in Prometheus format.
One aspect I'm unclear about is what _active_tasks metrics would represent.
My expectation is that /_metrics would be scoped to a node (and then leave
the aggregation across nodes to Prometheus or
It's a good point about querying every node for cluster-wide data such as
_active_tasks (assuming a direct translation of the current endpoint),
though I think it's better to lean on the monitoring tool to aggregate data
across nodes rather than deduplicate. Possibly the simplest thing for a v1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13825160#comment-13825160
]
Will Holley commented on COUCHDB-1935:
--
There is already a collapsable API URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13922671#comment-13922671
]
Will Holley commented on COUCHDB-2188:
--
This sounds like it is not fixable using
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2249:
Summary: Fauxton generates incorrect parameters when complex keys
are specified
Key: COUCHDB-2249
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2249
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley resolved COUCHDB-2249.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fauxton generates incorrect parameters when complex keys are specified
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2518:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0 does not support conflicts=true on /_changes
Key: COUCHDB-2518
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2518
Project: CouchDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2518:
-
Description:
CouchDB 1.X supports the conflicts=true query parameter for all API endpints
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2518:
-
Description:
CouchDB 1.X supports the conflicts=true query parameter for all API endpints
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2519:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0 does not support attachments=true on /_changes
Key: COUCHDB-2519
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2519
Project: CouchDB
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2523:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0: Specifying startkey/endkey parameters
alongside a keys parameter when querying /_all_docs should be invalid
Key: COUCHDB-2523
URL: https://issues.apache.org
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2530:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0 does not support POST requests to _changes
Key: COUCHDB-2530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2530
Project: CouchDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2530:
-
Description:
In CouchDB 1.6, the _changes feed accepts a POST request (e.g. to submit a
large
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2531:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0: POST to /_revs_diff with no revisions times
out
Key: COUCHDB-2531
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2531
Project: CouchDB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14303676#comment-14303676
]
Will Holley commented on COUCHDB-2537:
--
I'm happy to be shot down but I wouldn't
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2568:
Summary: CouchDB 2.0 /_all_docs does not return full attachment
data with attachments=true
Key: COUCHDB-2568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2568
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2568:
-
Description: Similar to case COUCHDB-2522, in CouchDB 1.6,
'/_all_docs'?keys=[somekey
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2568:
-
Summary: CouchDB 2.0 /_all_docs does not return full attachment data with
keys=[somekey
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Will Holley updated COUCHDB-2568:
-
Description:
Similar to case COUCHDB-2522, in CouchDB 1.6,
'/_all_docs'?keys=[somekey
Will Holley created COUCHDB-2674:
Summary: Inconsistent handling of URL encoded design doc name
between clustered and non-clustered interfaces
Key: COUCHDB-2674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB
44 matches
Mail list logo