Re: Welcome Colm to the CXF PMC

and Santuario) and addressing all kinds of security related questions and concerns.He's definitely a welcome addition to the PMC. Colm, welcome aboard! -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CXF 2.3.6 and 2.4.2. - take 2

/cxf/tags/cxf-2.4.2 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.3.6 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http

Re: [DISCUSS] Move some modules around

tests. (pax-exam based maybe?)I don't think the artifact/group id's of anything needs to change. Just the parent location entries in the poms. Is everyone OK with that? Does it make sense? -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DiSCUSS] WS-Notification

Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [DiSCUSS] WS-Notification

/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

will be open for at least 72 hours. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.3.9/2.4.6/2.5.2

. This releases are tagged at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.3.9 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.4.6 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.5.2 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http

Re: CXF releases….

release notes or version URL's or anything like that. Last I checked, we had about 80 issues resolved for 2.6.2 which is a lot. We're definitely a bit overdue. If JIRA is back up later today, I'll start builds. If not, I'll wait till Monday. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http

Re: [VOTE] New features.xml for 2.5.5(.1)

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 08/22/2012 05:12 PM, Willem jiang wrote: +1. We need to fix the feature issue ASAP. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 2.5.7/2.6.4/2.7.1

/ directory of the Maven staging areas. This releases are tagged at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.5.7 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.4 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.1 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. -- Jean-Baptiste

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.3/2.6.6/2.5.9

://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.5.9 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.6.6 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/tags/cxf-2.7.3 This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Here's my +1. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http

RE: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB  Original message From: Colm O hEigeartaigh cohei...@apache.org Date: 06/08/2015 16:02 (GMT+01:00) To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1 This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.2.1. Maven artifacts

Re: [VOTE] CXF 2.7.18/3.0.7/3.1.4

/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=55292609edc928dbfc47c8511157159b41fffcd2 Vote will be open for 72h. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Introducing Microbule...

I think blueprint is fine for now as it provides nice feature for microbule. I would evaluate DS⁣​ as Christian suggested. Regards JB On Nov 23, 2016, 13:58, at 13:58, James Carman wrote: >Yeah, I just used Blueprint because I'm more familiar with it at the

Re: JAX-RS Features not used for ClientProxies

Makes sense. +1. Regards JB On Oct 29, 2017, 08:44, at 08:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >+1 to align both, makes way more sense for end users IMHO > >Le 29 oct. 2017 02:53, "John D. Ament" a écrit >: > >> Hey guys >> >> Earlier today I was looking

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.7 and xic-utils 3.2.3

+1 (non binding) Quickly tested on Karaf with the examples. Regards JB On 24/10/2018 21:35, Daniel Kulp wrote: > It’s been over two months since we last release a 3.2.x. Thus, it’s time. > We’ve fixed a bunch of bugs, fixed some performance regressions, added a few > new features, etc… >

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5

+1 (non binding) Regards JB Le 4 oct. 2018 à 18:28, à 18:28, Francois Papon a écrit: >+1 (non-binding) > >Thanks! > >regards, > >François Papon >fpa...@apache.org > >Le 04/10/2018 à 13:25, Colm O hEigeartaigh a écrit : >> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.4.5. >> >> Git tag:

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF 3.1.17

+1 (non binding) Regards JB Le 30 sept. 2018 à 16:34, à 16:34, Jeff Genender a écrit: >+1 > >Jeff > >> On Sep 30, 2018, at 6:33 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > wrote: >> >> This is a vote to release Apache CXF 3.1.17. >> >> Issues fixed: >>

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

d Hat, Inc. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2019, at 9:06 PM, Dennis Kieselhorst >> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> in my view everything we discussed is finished. So we can cut a release >>> and start a vote, can't we? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> Dennis >>> >>> >> > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: 3.3.0 soon?

nder vote, and I believe a vote will also be called on > Karaf 4.2.2 shortly. We should be good to go then for CXF 3.3.0 either next > week or the week after, so if there is anything anyone needs to get in, now > is the time to do it. > > Colm. > > -- Jean-Baptiste O

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.1.18

;https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=fea181a7a21c37a003e97d10cdc8a3487b3d4afa> > > > Here is my +1 > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.2.8

ry.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1134> > > > Tag: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=a34bf55dea00c354bf3f49ad5b98fb18f01d9258 > > <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cxf.git;a=tag;h=a34bf55dea00c354bf3f49ad5b98fb18f01d9258> >

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.3.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 28/02/2019 19:56, Daniel Kulp wrote: > This is vote to release 3.3.1. This doesn’t fix a ton of issues (only 12), > but it does fix two relatively important regressions. > > Staging area: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1136/

Re: Dropping JDK9 / JDK10 jobs from Jenkins

Good idea. +1 Regards JB Le 23 mai 2019 à 07:00, à 07:00, Dennis Kieselhorst a écrit: >Hi Andriy! > >> I think we could drop CXF's JDK9 [0] and JDK10 [1] jobs from Jenkins >> since these JDKs are officially dead. Any objections? > >No objections, I also thought about this to reduce the number

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.9, CXF 3.3.2, and cxf-build-utils 3.4.2

p=cxf-build-utils.git;a=tag;h=4363ce17b167077b56543c3b7aa00b4c118782c3> > > Here is my +1 > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.2.11

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 24/10/2019 17:34, Daniel Kulp wrote: Colm pointed out to me that we also need a 3.2.11 release. Since that’s also been 2 months and we fixed 11 JIRA’s, it makes sense. It’s been over 2 months since 3.3.3 was released. We fixed 20 JIRAS. Staging area:

Re: [DISCUSS] CXF 3.5.x and beyond

Hi, Thanks for sharing. IMHO, option #1 is probably the most convenient. Regards JB On 11/08/2021 14:26, Andriy Redko wrote: Hey Jim, Romain, Thank you guys, I think Romain's suggestion to move 3.5.x to JDK-11 baseline is good idea, we would still be maintaining 3.4.x for a while, covering

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 29/09/2021 22:59, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release CXF 3.4.5 and 3.3.12. We have fixed over 34 issues and it’s been over 2 months since the last releases. Staging repositories: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1168

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:48 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks! > > Dan > > > > On Feb 8, 2022, at 11:57 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh > > wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major > > release that contains updates to CXF

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.1/3.4.6/3.3.13

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 10:01 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. It’s been > quite a while since the last 3.3.x and 3.4.x patches which is reflected by > almost 60 issues being fixed for 3.4.6. > > I’d like

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.2 and 3.4.7

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 8:21 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. This contains > a bunch of fixes related to jax-rs TCK’s as well as a bunch of dependency > updates and other fixes. > > > Staging repositories:

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.3.2

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 2:21 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF XJC Utils 3.3.2. > > Issues fixed: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315520=12351220 > Artifacts: >

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Build Utils 4.0.0

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:52 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Build Utils 4.0.0. It contains a > security fix to disable DocTypes during XML parsing and an update to > Java 11, with some other minor fixes. > > Artifacts: >

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF XJC 4.0.0

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:41 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF XJC 4.0.0. This is a major new > release with support for the jakarta namespace. > > Issues fixed: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.5.3 and 3.4.8

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 6:18 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patches for CXF. > > > Staging repositories: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1180/ >

Re: test failure in CI on karaf feature

Hi, I will take a look as well. Regards JB On Sun, May 8, 2022 at 5:22 PM Andriy Redko wrote: > > Hey Raymond, > > The STS (and other OSGi tests in general) should use Maven Local repository, > it is propagated > by maven-surefire-plugin (snippet below for sts-itests/pom.xml): > >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Retire CXF DOSGI?

Hi Colm Yes, I think it makes sense. I don't think CXF DOSGi is heavily used. Regards JB On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:49 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Hi all, > > What do you think about moving CXF DOSGI to the attic? There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 8:05 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. > > > Staging repository: (I forgot to close the repo between builds so only a > single staging repository that has both versions) >

Re: [VOTE] - Move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic

+1 Regards JB On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 3:54 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to move Apache CXF DOSGi to the attic. There is very > little activity for many years now (last commit 2.5 years ago - > https://github.com/apache/cxf-dosgi/commits/main). > > Previous discussion thread:

Re: CXF 4.0.0 jakarta release

+1 to release 4.0.0 even partial release. Regards JB On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 9:19 AM Jim Ma wrote: > > Hi all, > After 9 months of work, we finally fixed/worked around all issues for > Jakarta support. Now all the cxf tests are passed: > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/CXF/job/CXF-JDK17/848/

Re: [VOTE] CXF 3.5.6, 3.6.0, 4.0.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 11:01 PM Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > It’s been quite a while since the last round of releases and a bunch of work > has been done, lots of bug fixes, a couple of new features, etc… > > > Tags: >