sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364094956
Hmm...May be the registration of the unknown types should not be blocked as
I suspect this is how many users are alr
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364092698
OK, I've debugged the test and recall a bit better now what I was trying to
do with these supported types. FYI, I fo
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364092698
OK, I've debugged the test and recall a bit better now what I was trying to
do with these supported types. FYI, I fo
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364075241
Sorry, looking at the test in this PR which explains the issue...
--
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364072539
Hi, I was referring to a case where a provider implementing multiple
interfaces has to be registered under a specifi
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-364072539
Hi, I was referring to a case where a provider implementing multiple
interfaces has to be registered under a specifi
sberyozkin commented on issue #379: [CXF-7638] Only register provider if it
implements specified contracts
URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/379#issuecomment-363939747
This can be quite sensitive as users are also registering MBRs/MBWs and
indeed all other standard interfaces now via
