Re: Typo
Hi Gav, you're right, thanks for the info. I've just corrected it. Cheers Dennis Am 09.04.2018 um 06:22 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Hi cxf-ers > > I spy a typo on your from page. > > The warning says do not use 3.2.2 or 3.2.3 , but use 3.2.3 ! > > You mean 3.2.4 of course. > > HTH > > Gav… >
Typo
Hi cxf-ers I spy a typo on your from page. The warning says do not use 3.2.2 or 3.2.3 , but use 3.2.3 ! You mean 3.2.4 of course. HTH Gav…
[GitHub] cxf pull request #223: Fix obvious typo in DEBUG logs.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/223 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cxf pull request #223: Fix obvious typo in DEBUG logs.
GitHub user ajeans opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/223 Fix obvious typo in DEBUG logs. Noticed this on 3.1.8 while debugging something on 3.1.X, and master still has the typo. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ajeans/cxf master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/223.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #223 commit f377a844218e31dea5ad253f07b0332bce3b4d5e Author: Jeansen Date: 2017-01-16T13:45:54Z Fix obvious typo in DEBUG logs. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cxf pull request: Fix a typo in FIXED_PARAMETER_ORDER
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/122 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] cxf pull request: Fix a typo in FIXED_PARAMETER_ORDER
GitHub user trohovsky opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/122 Fix a typo in FIXED_PARAMETER_ORDER You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/trohovsky/cxf fixed-parameter-order-typo Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/122.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #122 commit bc15935f1e5920b1016bcdcf827012cb001e9347 Author: Tomas Rohovsky Date: 2016-03-15T12:32:54Z Fix a typo in FIXED_PARAMETER_ORDER --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Re: Typo error for null checking in EndpointImpl ?
Yea, a bug. The check really shouldn't even be there. It should just be
other.remove(o) no matter if its null or not. Fixed.
Dan
On Mar 15, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi, I found the codes below in the org.apache.cxf.jaxws.EndpointImpl (line
> 691)
>
> public Interceptor remove(int index) {
>Interceptor o = orig.remove(index);
>if (o == null) { <--- Is it a typo error ? Should be != null
>other.remove(o);
>}
>return o;
>}
>
> --
> Ivan
--
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Typo in wiki
Hi, Thanks for letting us know this issue. Just correct the wiki, should be sync up in a few hours. Freeman On 2011-7-15, at 下午3:27, akuhtz wrote: Hi, There is a typo in the code snippet on the http://cxf.apache.org/docs/transformationfeature.html Transformation feature site. The classname StaxTransf*ro*mFeature must be StaxTransf*or*mFeature. Cheers Andi -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Typo-in-wiki-tp4589705p4589705.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - Freeman Fang FuseSource Email:ff...@fusesource.com Web: fusesource.com Twitter: freemanfang Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
Typo in wiki
Hi, There is a typo in the code snippet on the http://cxf.apache.org/docs/transformationfeature.html Transformation feature site. The classname StaxTransf*ro*mFeature must be StaxTransf*or*mFeature. Cheers Andi -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Typo-in-wiki-tp4589705p4589705.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Ha ha no problem, Glen :) thanks for incorporating my change. - Aaron -Original Message- From: Glen Mazza [mailto:gma...@talend.com] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 10:48 AM To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor? Fixed on 2.3.2 and upcoming 2.4. Also, I checked the official CXF treasury ($0.00), sorry no money for the Monster drink. Thanks, Glen On 09.02.2011 14:40, Glen Mazza wrote: > Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless > he's become partial to other beverages). > > Glen > > On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: >> Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? >> It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). >> I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ >> cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup >> >> >> >> It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which >> wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. >> >> - Aaron >> > -- Glen Mazza Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com) blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Thanks! On 2/11/2011 4:26 AM, Willem Jiang wrote: Hi Glen, Your fix has some side effect, I just committed another patch[1] to fix the test error of SecurityPolicyTest. [1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069716&view=rev Willem On 2/10/11 11:47 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Fixed on 2.3.2 and upcoming 2.4. Also, I checked the official CXF treasury ($0.00), sorry no money for the Monster drink. Thanks, Glen On 09.02.2011 14:40, Glen Mazza wrote: Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's become partial to other beverages). Glen On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. - Aaron
Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Hi Glen, Your fix has some side effect, I just committed another patch[1] to fix the test error of SecurityPolicyTest. [1]http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069716&view=rev Willem On 2/10/11 11:47 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: Fixed on 2.3.2 and upcoming 2.4. Also, I checked the official CXF treasury ($0.00), sorry no money for the Monster drink. Thanks, Glen On 09.02.2011 14:40, Glen Mazza wrote: Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's become partial to other beverages). Glen On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. - Aaron -- Willem -- FuseSource Web: http://www.fusesource.com Blog:http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang
Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Fixed on 2.3.2 and upcoming 2.4. Also, I checked the official CXF treasury ($0.00), sorry no money for the Monster drink. Thanks, Glen On 09.02.2011 14:40, Glen Mazza wrote: Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's become partial to other beverages). Glen On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. - Aaron -- Glen Mazza Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com) blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Monster Energy drink? That's not a reward, that's a punishment. :) On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: > Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's > become partial to other beverages). > > Glen > > On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: >> >> Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? >> It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). >> I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ >> cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup >> >> >> >> It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which >> wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. >> >> - Aaron >> > > > -- > Glen Mazza > Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com) > blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza > > >
Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's become partial to other beverages). Glen On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. - Aaron -- Glen Mazza Software Engineer, Talend (http://www.talend.com) blog: http://www.jroller.com/gmazza
Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?
Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/LoggingInInterceptor.java?revision=1058274&view=markup It seems accidental, given the invocations on lines 55 and 64 which wouldn't make much sense if it were deliberate. - Aaron
