Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-332

2013-06-01 Thread Gerhard Petracek
which will do the injection itself. Imo it's mostly a question about what else we like to add into this module. LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc: Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2013, 20

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-332

2013-06-01 Thread Gerhard Petracek
maybe our next step should be an agreed deprecation-strategy (before we continue with such topics). regards, gerhard 2013/6/1 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi thomas, no - we don't have @Advanced. (-1 for adding it and therefore -1 for adding parts which would need

Re: DISCUSS DeltaSpike-332

2013-06-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
to bring some Java EE 7 features to Java EE 6 via DeltaSpike, I don't see a reason not to do this. — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi thomas, no - we don't have

Re: Jsf page and config?

2013-06-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi romain, so far users were very happy with @View#basePath, @View#name and @View#extension. the only request we saw was about a simple mechanism to change the default naming-conventions. with deltaspike that's possible. just use

Re: ProjectStages in EAR scenarios

2013-06-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2013/6/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +1, ear = 1 app so having 2 project stages would lead to stupid issues IMO *Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
you are very welcome to suggest a better name. regards, gerhard 2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com Suggestion: When porting CODI ConversationScope to DS, should it be possible to NOT name this Scope ConversationScope Currently, when using CODI, it is very confusing to have

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
better for us as it may be used in a more generic way and . 2013/6/6 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: you are very welcome to suggest a better name. regards, gerhard 2013/6/6 titou10 titou10 titou10.tito...@gmail.com Suggestion: When porting CODI

Re: [DISCUSS] deltaspike-0.5 features

2013-06-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
? On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: dialog is misleading (in the technical context). workflow is better but maybe misleading since one of the first associations is a workflow engine regards, gerhard 2013/6/6 Adrian

Re: Servlet module prototype

2013-06-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
the general jira-issue for it is [1]. regards, gerhard [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-349 2013/6/7 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Gerhard and me thought about this for quite a few other features as well. Event firing is indeed a bit expensive. Thus we might add a

Re: CDI Query import

2013-06-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 for a separated module. regards, gerhard 2013/6/14 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com Jpa-repository sounds fine as a jpa submodule for me Le 14 juin 2013 19:56, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com a écrit : i thought it was a separate module from JPA at inception. On

Re: [DISCUSS] beanval module name

2013-06-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi john, in codi we used bv1 (like jpa1, jsf12, jsf20,...). if we don't plan to support multiple versions with separated modules, i tend to like just bv (since we use jpa and jsf for the modules of the corresponding specs). regards, gerhard 2013/6/16 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com

Re: [DISCUSS] beanval module name

2013-06-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
. If it were bean-val instead of beanval, would anyone mind that? John On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi john, in codi we used bv1 (like jpa1, jsf12, jsf20,...). if we don't plan to support multiple versions with separated modules, i

Re: [DISCUSS] beanval module name

2013-06-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
/rmannibucau* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/* http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/6/16 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com we (= bv-eg) ~always used bv. it's even used

Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name

2013-06-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
-1 bv was coined by the eg, is used in the spec. document and other areas since years (and it fits to the abbreviations used for other spec. modules). - +1 for bv regards, gerhard 2013/6/17 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de gee, was too fast. Amending my vote to +0 (I'm fine with both)

Re: ViewConfig + Rewrite

2013-06-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, you are welcome to suggest a possible syntax for it. regards, gerhard 2013/6/17 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, are there any plans integrate Rewrite within DS ViewConfig? Regards, Thomas

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Thomas Hug as new DeltaSpike committer

2013-06-22 Thread Gerhard Petracek
welcome! regards, gerhard 2013/6/22 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de The Apache DeltaSpike Team is happy to announce the addition of Thomas Hug as new committer. Thomas will contribute the CDI-Query module and might also help in other areas. Welcome on board, Thomas! Sincerly, the

Re: all tests green (almost)

2013-08-11 Thread Gerhard Petracek
please have a look at the info i added to [1] back then. regards, gerhard [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/DeltaSpike%20Weld%202.0.0.SP1/ 2013/8/11 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de Hi folks! All our CI are now green again. The only Exception being weld-2.0.0 and

Re: Security Module - Migration from CODI (missing AbstractAccessDecisionVoter, SimpleSecurityViolation)

2013-09-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, the intention was to keep it minimal. i'm not sure how many users use those convenience classes. let's wait for more feedback. regards, gerhard 2013/9/30 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, i currently migrate from CODI security to DS security. Are there any

Re: DS + JSF 2.2

2013-09-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, for now you have to wait for mark and/or you can have a look at [1]. (it isn't about jsf 2.2, however, as a codi user you will see that you are used to it.) regards, gerhard [1] http://os890.blogspot.co.at/2013/07/add-on-codi-scopes-for-deltaspike.html 2013/9/30 Thomas Andraschko

Re: ViewConfig does not work as expected (nested @Folder, @Secured)

2013-09-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, if you are trying to migrate a codi-view-config, just remove your usages of @Folder and it should work. (please file an issue, if it isn't the case.) i'll have a look at the name-check. (please file an issue for it in any case.) regards, gerhard 2013/9/30 Thomas Andraschko

Re: DS + JSF 2.2

2013-09-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
will be included directly to DS for the next release. I mean, you already did the work to move it the DS base. So i would believe that only reviews left. Regards, Thomas 2013/9/30 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi thomas, for now you have to wait for mark and/or you

Re: ViewConfig does not work as expected (nested @Folder, @Secured)

2013-09-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi thomas, if you are trying to migrate a codi-view-config, just remove your usages of @Folder and it should work. (please file an issue, if it isn't the case.) i'll have a look at the name-check. (please file an issue for it in any case

Re: DS + JSF 2.2

2013-10-01 Thread Gerhard Petracek
the work to move it the DS base. So i would believe that only reviews left. Regards, Thomas 2013/9/30 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi thomas, for now you have to wait for mark and/or you can have a look at [1]. (it isn't about jsf 2.2, however, as a codi user

Re: Renaming @ViewRef config property?

2013-10-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
-0.5 for now once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that expressive. that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). regards, gerhard 2013/10/3 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, currently @ViewRef has only one property called config. So the current

Re: Renaming @ViewRef config property?

2013-10-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1, same for @ConfigProperty btw Le 3 oct. 2013 20:49, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a écrit : -0.5 for now once we add more, you get the same and it would be not that expressive. that was the reason for changing it (compared to codi). regards, gerhard

Re: Renaming @ViewRef config property?

2013-10-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
2013/10/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com If config is the unique mandatory attr it should be value imo Le 3 oct. 2013 22:39, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com a écrit : hi thomas, yes - we had something in codi and we might add something like the payload in bv

Re: ViewConfig does not work as expected (nested @Folder, @Secured)

2013-10-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, @Duplicated config for the same folder: can you please provide a test (like [1]) which illustrates the issue. thx regards, gerhard [1] http://s.apache.org/OZ3 2013/9/30 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com +1 regards, gerhard 2013/9/30 Thomas Andraschko

Re: Any plan to adopt Java EE 7

2013-10-11 Thread Gerhard Petracek
short addition: some parts were postponed (in the final version of the spec.). however, at myfaces we are currently working on it. i'll port whatever is useful, once we are done. regards, gerhard 2013/5/1 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi hantsy, see chapter 5.4.1 of jsr-344

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
to try to find someone to help with docs, but the person I had in mind just left Red Hat :-(. Also +1 to going to 1.0 soon (i.e. making docs and stability a priority!). On 11 Nov 2013, at 23:09, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: if we move to v1 soon, we need an useful

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, 12 November 2013, 16:18 Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0? @mark: i never said that we should do #2. regards, gerhard 2013/11/12 Mark

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2013-11-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
. making docs and stability a priority!). On 11 Nov 2013, at 23:09, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: if we move to v1 soon, we need an useful versioning strategy, better docs and examples + the api and spi need to be stable for some

Re: Any plan to port @Startup?

2013-11-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
with jsf2+ you can use PostConstructApplicationEvent regards, gerhard 2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, is there any to plan to port @Startup for JSF Applications? Regards, Thomas

Re: Any plan to port @Startup?

2013-11-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
Is a SystemEventListener CDI-aware with DS? 2013/11/27 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com with jsf2+ you can use PostConstructApplicationEvent regards, gerhard 2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, is there any to plan to port @Startup

Re: Any plan to port @Startup?

2013-11-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
yes - you are very welcome to do it (don't forget to use Deactivatable) regards, gerhard 2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com How is it handled it DS? Should i just create a issue + providing a patch or something? 2013/11/27 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

Re: Any plan to port @Startup?

2013-11-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
(@Observers @ViewRef(config = MyView.class) PreRenderViewEvent event) but the #config in ViewRef has a @NonBinding. Is this by design? 2013/11/27 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com yes - you are very welcome to do it (don't forget to use Deactivatable) regards, gerhard 2013

Re: Any plan to port @Startup?

2013-11-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
afair that's a leftover from codi (where it is needed). (we should discuss @Eager based on your patch.) regards, gerhard 2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com imo the event-style fits for PostConstructApplicationEvent (instead of @Startup), because you have usually

[DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, please have a look at [1]. it's just a first (and quick) draft based on major use-cases. however, it's working already and the api/spi is minimal - we can think about adding it to deltaspike. (it's already prepared for additional use-cases, however, for sure we can

Re: Window Handling - CODI like mode?

2013-12-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, if you can upgrade to jsf 2.2, you can use ClientWindowRenderMode.DELEGATED (+ configure url for javax.faces.CLIENT_WINDOW_MODE). regards, gerhard 2013/11/27 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, i always get a loading screen with the new DS window handling. Is

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :) And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the module name should indicate that it is JUnit specific. Christian 2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi @ all, please have a look at [1

Re: Simple Cron Module

2013-12-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
in deltaspike, but we can take it. You find the code here: https://github.com/openknowledge/openknowledge-cdi-extensions/tree/master/openknowledge-cdi-job So, if anyone wants to review, feel free… Regards, Arne Von: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.commailto: gerhard.petra

Re: Simple Cron Module

2013-12-20 Thread Gerhard Petracek
:55, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi @ all, we could also combine it with [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://s.apache.org/MOc 2013/12/6 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Arne, can i rework it and provide a patch? Do

Re: Fwd: Support of Instance in OWB

2013-12-29 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@john: you changed it to: @Test public void testAmbiguousFileLookup(@ExternalResource(storage=ClasspathStorage.class, location=META-INF/beans.xml) InputStream inputStream) {/*...*/} - the exception still occurs, but junit can't handle it any longer (because it occurs too early). regards,

Re: Fwd: Support of Instance in OWB

2013-12-29 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@john: your change also causes a NullPointerException in ClasspathWebProfileTest#testSuccessfulAmbiguousLookup (with tomee) regards, gerhard 2013/12/29 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com @john: you changed it to: @Test public void testAmbiguousFileLookup(@ExternalResource

Re: Fwd: Support of Instance in OWB

2013-12-29 Thread Gerhard Petracek
that means we can't keep it that way (due to this issue). regards, gerhard 2013/12/29 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com The NPE in TomEE appears to be a TomEE bug, not injecting test method arguments. On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote

Re: Fwd: Support of Instance in OWB

2013-12-29 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@john: please update all arquillian.xml files (not just one). thx regards, gerhard 2013/12/29 John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com Should be fixed now (and fixed the AS7 issue). On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: that means we can't

Re: Optimizing the integration tests

2014-01-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@christian: +1 (@as7: sounds like a missing cleanup, like it's done for tomee) regards, gerhard 2014/1/3 Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de Hey Ron, yeah, there are differences between arquillian.xml files. But why? I don't see any reason for having different arquillian.xml files

Re: Test-Control injects in test class object only

2014-01-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi dirk, deltaspike just delegates the injection to the cdi-container. regards, gerhard 2014/1/3 Dirk Weil dirk.w...@web.de Hi! I've just come around Test-Control - great module, simplifies in-container testing a lot. But I discovered one thing and I'm not sure if it's intended or a

Re: Test-Control injects in test class object only

2014-01-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
,...) - BeanProvider#injectFields is used as fallback regards, gerhard [1] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=deltaspike.git;a=commit;h=4939550ed208c4e6be98ee12e6019ebe7d271afd 2014/1/3 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi dirk, deltaspike just delegates the injection to the cdi

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 for a veto in case of cdi 1.1. @external producers: we can document it (how users can veto e.g. producers, if they see any overlap). however, deltaspike shouldn't add complexity just because there might be a custom producer (for the same). regards, gerhard 2014/1/4 Christian Kaltepoth

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
in an environment which already has such a producer registered? This is not easy to accomplish! Thus I'm for keeping it. LieGrue, strub From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org Sent: Saturday, 4 January 2014, 12:57

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
qualifier cause it was missing in cdi so conflicts can occurs and are quite common Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
. Having a namespace should be a best practise IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: i

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: you can use e.g. @Decorator in such special cases or just do the wrapping like you would without cdi. regards

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: you should do the wrapping like you would do it without cdi anyway. regards

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-01-04 Thread Gerhard Petracek
care to not mention we don't use a qualifier, here we do). Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014/1/4 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com

Re: Test-Control injects in test class object only

2014-01-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
, there is no difference. Regards Dirk *Von:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] *Gesendet:* Freitag, 3. Januar 2014 12:00 *An:* dev@deltaspike.apache.org *Betreff:* Re: Test-Control injects in test class object only short addition: i've added a test for it and it looks fine

Re: [VOTE] Get rid of @Web in the servlet module

2014-01-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 since we haven't seen a technical reason which would block this simplification regards, gerhard 2014/1/7 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com +0 Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau

Re: JSF - default ClientWindowRenderMode?

2014-01-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2014/1/9 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com Hi, currently the default rendering mode is our windowhandler js/html way. Many people don't like it because you always get a loading screen for EACH GET request:

Re: Ideas on ClientWindow handling / refactoring

2014-01-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek
workarounds for DS in PrimeFaces. Therefore adding the windowId e.g. to the ViewMap would be a safer way. Regards, Thomas 2014/1/10 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com @thomas: with jsf 2.2+ it's different. the window-id is (/should be) also used (if enabled

Re: Ideas on ClientWindow handling / refactoring

2014-01-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
finally know what LAZY should do. But i like to structure and the single entry point via DSWindowContext#init. Also storeEvent seems the be unused? Could anyone explain this to me? 2014/1/10 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com (similar to what we have

Re: Ideas on ClientWindow handling / refactoring

2014-01-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
of the last email to clarify what the LAZY script part should do and that it currently has an bug. Regards, Thomas 2014/1/14 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com imo we should keep one mode which works without js. regards, gerhard 2014/1/14 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho

Re: Ideas on ClientWindow handling / refactoring

2014-01-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 for merging them and without the js it still works (like the default-mode of codi). regards, gerhard 2014/1/14 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com +1 for keeping URL and LAZY? :) 2014/1/14 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com +1 regards, gerhard 2014/1

Re: JBoss Tools DeltaSpike

2014-01-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2014/1/16 Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com Hi all, Max and Alexey from the JBoss Tools team (http://www.jboss.org/tools/) would like to see we can improve the DeltaSpike tooling in JBoss Tools. They propose that we have a Google Hangout with them, and anyone interested

Re: ClientWindow compatibility - Rename post param to javax.faces.ClientWindow?

2014-01-21 Thread Gerhard Petracek
it's fine that you have a workaround there, however, we need to think about the out-of-the-box compatibility with other component-libraries as well. regards, gerhard 2014/1/20 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com I added a workaround in PrimeFaces -

Re: ClientWindow compatibility - Rename post param to javax.faces.ClientWindow?

2014-01-21 Thread Gerhard Petracek
:) 2014/1/21 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com it's fine that you have a workaround there, however, we need to think about the out-of-the-box compatibility with other component-libraries as well. regards, gerhard 2014/1/20 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com I

Re: [DISCUSS] Spring - CDI Integration in DeltaSpike

2014-01-22 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, i would like to continue with this discussion. [1] describes a two-way bridge which is already based on deltaspike. it offers a simple spi which allows more advanced add-ons like it is mentioned in [2]. regards, gerhard [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Spring - CDI Integration in DeltaSpike

2014-01-22 Thread Gerhard Petracek
such a bridge). regards, gerhard 2014/1/22 Jason Porter lightguard...@gmail.com I'd like to engage the Pivotal Team (anyone have contacts?) to see if we can get some of there help as well to create a really good integration. On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: Optimizing the integration tests

2014-02-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
wrote: Hey Gerhard, yeah, I wasn't aware that the Glassfish jobs have already been added. But Wildfly is still missing. Christian 2014/1/24 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com hi christian, the jenkins-jobs should be in place already

Re: JSF Security regression

2014-02-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
i've attached a patch to DELTASPIKE-480. it would be great, if you can test it with your application. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-06 Gerhard

Re: Revisit cdiCtrl module name and how it's inconsistent with test-control?

2014-02-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek
: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-10 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : i wouldn't move test-control, since it's a module based

Re: V 1.0 getting close... Logotype?

2014-02-10 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@logo: i hope we will see some nice suggestions soon (see [1]). regards, gerhard [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/DESIGN-520 2014-02-10 15:03 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: +1 John +1 for using the logo in the header 2014-02-10 14:59 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament

Re: Revisit cdiCtrl module name and how it's inconsistent with test-control?

2014-02-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
-control. It needs CdiCtrl _and_ ds-core. But it's also essentially not a ds module neither. LieGrue, strub On Monday, 10 February 2014, 13:23, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: +1 there is no issue with api-/name-/... changes before v1. we had

Re: Revisit cdiCtrl module name and how it's inconsistent with test-control?

2014-02-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-14 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: imo the definition should be simple: if it depends on deltaspike-core, it's a module @romain: again: there is no issue with api

Re: Revisit cdiCtrl module name and how it's inconsistent with test-control?

2014-02-14 Thread Gerhard Petracek
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-14 11:33 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: we would need a vote about your statement, because it changes our official statement. if the majority

Re: Revisit cdiCtrl module name and how it's inconsistent with test-control?

2014-02-15 Thread Gerhard Petracek
with that argument (that it is something different), we don't have to rename other parts (because they are different anyway). regards, gerhard 2014-02-15 8:18 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de: Well, I do not get the reason at all. If someone could tell me the benefits of this

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-15 Thread Gerhard Petracek
seamless. - More verbose and not as pretty to use. - Does not see incompatibly as a big problem. Reasoning is: End user must test application behavior after upgrade anyway and problems should be minor. Btw i'm +0 On 4 January 2014 17:09, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: [DISCUSS] next release version? 0.6 or 1.0?

2014-02-16 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi ove, i was only talking about the commits. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-16 22:07 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com:

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
about the name gerhard? Any veto about such a change? 2014-02-15 11:29 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : i'm ok with changing it, if we do it for both. however, we would need a better name (imo without the project-name). regards

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 8:32 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : @thomas: maybe something like @Managed or @ManagedResource

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
2014-02-18 9:26 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: the point is that it isn't expressive at all... regards, gerhard 2014-02-18 9:20 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com: Project name should be fine now, if not all pakcages will change so

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
i thought the project name would fit and make the origin obvious. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 9:51 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: @romain: you will always have same/similar terms in different areas (see e.g. message). regards, gerhard

[DISCUSS] move @Initialized and @Destroyed

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, if we would move @Initialized and @Destroyed to ds-core, we could use them for other parts as well (e.g. instead of @BeforeJsfRequest and @AfterJsfRequest). regards, gerhard

Re: [DISCUSS] move @Initialized and @Destroyed

2014-02-18 Thread Gerhard Petracek
, strub On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 13:27, Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I like such minor improvements and finalize such stuff :) Whats the replacements for @After/BeforeJsfRequest then? 2014-02-18 13:23 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: [DISCUSS] move @Initialized and @Destroyed

2014-02-19 Thread Gerhard Petracek
good! 2014-02-18 14:19 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : @ thomas: @Observes @BeforeJsfRequest FacesContext @Observes @AfterJsfRequest FacesContext - @Observes @Initialized FacesContext @Observes @Destroyed FacesContext the implementation

Re: Wled 2.1.2: Could not find beans for Type=class org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.scope.window.WindowBeanHolder and qualifiers:[]

2014-02-20 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi ove, please have a look at [1]. regards, gerhard [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/DeltaSpike/job/DeltaSpike%20Weld%202.1.2/ http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: Wled 2.1.2: Could not find beans for Type=class org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.scope.window.WindowBeanHolder and qualifiers:[]

2014-02-20 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi ove, please have a look at [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/source.html#scm-repository http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-20 11:51

Re: Wled 2.1.2: Could not find beans for Type=class org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.scope.window.WindowBeanHolder and qualifiers:[]

2014-02-21 Thread Gerhard Petracek
with core/impl-module and they are 100% equal. Cheers, Ove On 20 Feb 2014, at 12:45, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi ove, please have a look at [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://deltaspike.apache.org/source.html#scm-repository http://www.irian.at Your

Re: Wled 2.1.2: Could not find beans for Type=class org.apache.deltaspike.core.impl.scope.window.WindowBeanHolder and qualifiers:[]

2014-02-21 Thread Gerhard Petracek
/237358 2014-02-21 10:59 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com: hi ove, the project you provided shows an arquillian config-issue. please check the setup again and/or contact the arquillian community. regards, gerhard 2014-02-20 23:01 GMT+01:00 Ove Ranheim

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
of tradeoff Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : we haven't seen a nice name so

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
javax.annotation.Priority? 2014-02-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com : it's just a stereotype to get a better tool-support... @Advanced is also a qualifier (at least in codi). however, we need ordinal or we add @InvocationOrder as it was in codi

Re: Servlet Module - Do we really need @Web?

2014-02-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-23 22:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko andraschko.tho...@gmail.com: which consistency gerhard? 2014-02-23 22:45 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: NPE on DefaultClientWindow.getWindowId after long period of inactivity

2014-02-23 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi thomas, if you have any issue with the url-handling, please provide details about it. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-23 22:39 GMT+01:00

Re: Deactivation DeltaSpikeContextExtension

2014-02-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
done - thx for the review. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2014-02-27 11:52 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com: Hello guys, Would be

Re: git commit: DELTASPIKE-420 Repository integration with TransactionStrategy

2014-02-27 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@thomas: with that you have an overhead (in EntityManagerHolder: proxy due to @ApplicationScoped + ThreadLocal) which is just useful for users of the ds-data module. - if you would like to keep it that way, please use a specialized bean in the ds-data module and avoid the overhead in the

Re: @JsfPhaseListener - Alternative name?

2014-03-06 Thread Gerhard Petracek
-1, because you would get e.g.: @DeltaSpike @DeltaSpikeOrdinal(1) public class MyPhaseListener implements PhaseListener { //... } for sure it's a matter of taste, but imo it looks strange... (+ as mentioned earlier, it isn't consistent with other parts.) regards, gerhard 2014-03-06 20:11

Re: How can TransactionScoped be started with weld-embedded-1.1

2014-03-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi ove, #1 currently only std. scopes are supported by ContextControl. #2 it will work once TransactionalInterceptor gets called regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache

Re: How can TransactionScoped be started with weld-embedded-1.1

2014-03-07 Thread Gerhard Petracek
: at com.parts.persistence.test.repository.TestBean$Proxy$_$$_WeldClientProxy.transaction(Unknown Source) at com.parts.persistence.test.repository.PartsRepositoryTest.testMe(PartsRepositoryTest.java:141) Cheers, Ove On 07 Mar 2014, at 20:11, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra

Re: How can TransactionScoped be started with weld-embedded-1.1

2014-03-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek
exact equivalent of this test case. The test case fails on: deltaspikeProductDAO.save(product); The demo demonstrates that it works with Spring Data, but breaks with DeltaSpike Data. Cheers, Ove On 07 Mar 2014, at 21:46, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi ove

first steps for the next release

2014-03-12 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, if there are no objections, i will start with the first steps for the next release (v0.6) by the end of this week. regards, gerhard

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >