i'll commit it within the next days.
we can start e.g. with:
org.apache.deltaspike.modules
deltaspike-test-control
and keep "junit" in the corresponding package-names.
once we add e.g. support for testng, we can think about the different
possibilities.
e.g. if we would provide different m
t; - Original Message -
>> From: Romain Manni-Bucau
>> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 19:59
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>>
>> Which gain supporting testng?
>>
>> Testng supports j
gt; To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 19:59
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>
> Which gain supporting testng?
>
> Testng supports junit iirc
> Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth"
> a
> écrit :
>
Which gain supporting testng?
Testng supports junit iirc
Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth" a
écrit :
> I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :)
>
> And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the
> module name should indicate that it is JUn
I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :)
And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the
module name should indicate that it is JUnit specific.
Christian
2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1].
>
> it's just a first (
t;> yup +1
>>
>> TestNG support would also be handy later.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> From: Thomas Andraschko
>>>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
&g
riginal Message -
> From: John D. Ament
> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 13:08
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>
> I'd personally prefer to see this as an Arquillian add on, especially
> since the embedded conta
> >> From: Thomas Andraschko
> >>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> >>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22
> >>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
> >>
> >>
> >>+1
> >>simple and nice approach
> >>
> >>
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Thomas Andraschko
>>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22
>>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>>
>>
>>+1
>>simple and nice approach
>&
yup +1
TestNG support would also be handy later.
LieGrue,
strub
>
> From: Thomas Andraschko
>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control
>
>
>+1
>simple an
+1
simple and nice approach
2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek
> hi @ all,
>
> please have a look at [1].
>
> it's just a first (and quick) draft based on major use-cases.
> however, it's working already and the api/spi is minimal -> we can think
> about adding it to deltaspike.
> (it's already prepare
11 matches
Mail list logo