Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-03 Thread Gerhard Petracek
i'll commit it within the next days. we can start e.g. with: org.apache.deltaspike.modules deltaspike-test-control and keep "junit" in the corresponding package-names. once we add e.g. support for testng, we can think about the different possibilities. e.g. if we would provide different m

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
t; - Original Message - >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau >> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 19:59 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control >> >> Which gain supporting testng? >> >> Testng supports j

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Struberg
gt; To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 19:59 > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control > > Which gain supporting testng? > > Testng supports junit iirc > Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth" > a > écrit : >

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Which gain supporting testng? Testng supports junit iirc Le 2 déc. 2013 18:11, "Christian Kaltepoth" a écrit : > I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :) > > And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the > module name should indicate that it is JUn

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Christian Kaltepoth
I really like this. So +1 for adding it. Great work Gerhard. :) And I agree with Mark that we should also support TestNG later. So the module name should indicate that it is JUnit specific. Christian 2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek > hi @ all, > > please have a look at [1]. > > it's just a first (

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
t;> yup +1 >> >> TestNG support would also be handy later. >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> From: Thomas Andraschko >>>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org &g

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Struberg
riginal Message - > From: John D. Ament > To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 13:08 > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control > > I'd personally prefer to see this as an Arquillian add on, especially > since the embedded conta

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Gerhard Petracek
> >> From: Thomas Andraschko > >>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org > >>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22 > >>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control > >> > >> > >>+1 > >>simple and nice approach > >> > >> >

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread John D. Ament
> > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >> >> From: Thomas Andraschko >>To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org >>Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22 >>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control >> >> >>+1 >>simple and nice approach >&

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Mark Struberg
yup +1 TestNG support would also be handy later. LieGrue, strub > > From: Thomas Andraschko >To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org >Sent: Monday, 2 December 2013, 11:22 >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control > > >+1 >simple an

Re: [DISCUSS] unit-test cdi-control

2013-12-02 Thread Thomas Andraschko
+1 simple and nice approach 2013/12/2 Gerhard Petracek > hi @ all, > > please have a look at [1]. > > it's just a first (and quick) draft based on major use-cases. > however, it's working already and the api/spi is minimal -> we can think > about adding it to deltaspike. > (it's already prepare