Re: [IMPORTANT] Apache DeviceMap going to Attic

Bertrand/all, Sorry but the fact is, there were many committers and they did not commit for whatever reason. Several committers (or their peers, there was nothing private or "secret" about it) expressed their hope or faith to do so, but could not fulfill those promises. That is why the activity

Re: [IMPORTANT] Apache DeviceMap going to Attic

This list has always been a little weird, after "You know who" attempted to tamper with it and/or things like JIRA because he would not accept input and opinion by anybody else. Until now I can send messages into the list, but never get any notifications. I am not sure, if that's what you intended

YAUAA: Yet Another User-Agent Analyzer

Hi all! I tried to brought up the issue of unsustainability of maintaining a repository-based User-Agent parser/analyzer subject in the mailing list before[1], but got no response at all. At bol.com, we tried to do this maintenance for DeviceMap and it inevitably failed. The reason is simple: no

Re: |VOTE| was: [IMPORTANT] Apache DeviceMap going to Attic

+1 Werner On Thu, Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:05:44 GMT, Radu Cotescu wrote: Yes, you're right. :D +1 On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 at 16:57 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Resending with a [VOTE] subject line tag as I suppose voting is Radu's > intention. > > Here's

Re: [IMPORTANT] Apache DeviceMap going to Attic

The real problem of course was from day one, that DeviceMap had no functional committers:-/ While we welcomed Volcan as a committer and a dozen others (including some who served on the PMC, too) officially were or still are part of the team nobody did commit. Beside occasional JIRA posts or

Re: [IMPORTANT] Apache DeviceMap going to Attic

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Werner Keil wrote: > The real problem of course was from day one, that DeviceMap had no > functional committers:-/ I'll just state that the following elements of your message, quoted in full below, are unacceptable in Apache projects: