[dpdk-dev] fm10k_rxtx.c does not compile

2015-02-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
I just pulled the code and found a unused function error ?dump_rxd()? I had to add the ifdef around the function and remove the ifdef inside the function: #ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_FM10K_DEBUG_RX static inline void dump_rxd(union fm10k_rx_desc *rxd) { RTE_SET_USED(rxd); PMD_RX_LOG(DEBUG,

[dpdk-dev] fm10k_rxtx.c does not compile

2015-02-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
I believe Jeff @ Intel is going to submit a patch soon. On 2/18/15, 11:18 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >2015-02-18 17:01, Wiles, Keith: >> I just pulled the code and found a unused function error ?dump_rxd()? >> >> I had to add the ifdef aro

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fm10k: fix clang warning flags

2015-02-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 2/18/15, 11:57 AM, "Shaw, Jeffrey B" wrote: >This commit fixes the following error which was reported when >compiling with clang by removing the option. > >error: unknown warning option '-Wno-unused-but-set-variable' > >Signed-off-by: Jeff Shaw Acked-by: keith.wiles at intel.com >--- >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] fm10k: fix clang unused function error

2015-02-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 2/18/15, 12:07 PM, "Shaw, Jeffrey B" wrote: >This commit fixes the following error which was reported when >compiling with clang by moving the function inside an >RTE_LIBRTE_FM10K_DEBUG_RX ifdef block. > >error: unused function 'dump_rxd' > >Signed-off-by: Jeff Shaw Acked-by: keith.wiles

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] enicpmd: Cisco Systems Inc. VIC Ethernet PMD

2015-02-26 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 2/26/15, 5:49 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >Hi Sujith, > >Do you have news about doc for enic? > >In case you didn't find the doc for pktgen-dpdk, it's available here: > http://pktgen.readthedocs.org Hi Sujith, If you can not find the answer your questions in the doc please me an

[dpdk-dev] Error seen while compiling Pktgen-dpdk

2015-02-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 2/28/15, 1:36 AM, "Shankari Vaidyalingam" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm facing the below error while executing make on Pktgen-dpdk source. >I'm using 2.8 version of pktgen downloaded >I have built DPDK binaries and then tried building pktgen-dpdk. >RTE_TARGET is set to x86_64-pktgen-linuxapp-gcc and

[dpdk-dev] Do we need the refcnt set to zero again?

2015-02-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
Looking that the code below does the rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m,0) need to be present? static inline struct rte_mbuf* __attribute__((always_inline)) __rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(struct rte_mbuf *m) { __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 0); if (likely (rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 1) || likely

[dpdk-dev] Error seen while compiling Pktgen-dpdk

2015-02-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 2/28/15, 8:00 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 01:06:32PM +0530, Shankari Vaidyalingam wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm facing the below error while executing make on Pktgen-dpdk source. >> I'm using 2.8 version of pktgen downloaded >> I have built DPDK binaries and then tried

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] Pktgen-DPDK updated to version 2.8.3

2015-02-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Everyone, I have updated Pktgen to work with DPDK 2.0.0-rc1, but will require a patch to enable the correct build system changes. Please find the patch here for DPDK, until the patch has be integrated or resolved. http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3799/ Pktgen-DPDK is a ASCII

[dpdk-dev] New to DPDK

2015-01-14 Thread Wiles, Keith
Most people I guess use a Xeon CPU class MB with one or two sockets running Linux with a supported NICs. I use a motherboard like the one below running Ubuntu 12.04 with 12G RAM and the 82599 NICs. You can find more supported NICs in the documentation and you need find the rest of the parts :-)

[dpdk-dev] [DISCUSSION] : ERROR while compiling dpdk-1.7 on ubuntu14.04

2015-01-16 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 1/16/15, 7:43 AM, "Srinivasreddy R" wrote: >sorry typo i am using Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS . > >On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Srinivasreddy R < >srinivasreddy4390 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> hi, >> Getting error while compiling dpdk on ubuntu10.04. >> >> >> export RTE_SDK=$(pwd) >> export

[dpdk-dev] DPDK Port Mirroring

2015-07-09 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 7/9/15, 12:26 PM, "dev on behalf of Assaad, Sami (Sami)" wrote: >Hello, > >I want to build a DPDK app that is able to port-mirror all ingress >traffic from two 10G interfaces. > >1. Is it possible in port-mirroring traffic consisting of 450byte >packets at 20G without losing more than

[dpdk-dev] igb PMD should set the default tx wthresh correctly.

2015-07-17 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 7/17/15, 9:15 AM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-07-16 19:49, Stephen Hemminger: >> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:52:09 + >> "Lu, Wenzhuo" wrote: >> >> > Hi Stephen, >> > I don't think there's a conflict. The message just reminder us that >>we can adjust the values to

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time

2015-06-03 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/3/15, 2:24 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >2015-06-03 13:49, Keith Wiles: >> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles >> --- >> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/eal.c | 20 >> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 32 >> >> 2 files

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time

2015-06-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Stephen On 6/3/15, 7:12 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote: >On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:49:53 -0500 >Keith Wiles wrote: > >> +/* Launch threads, called at application init() and parse app args. */ >> +int >> +rte_eal_init_parse(int argc, char **argv, >> +int (*parse)(int, char **)) >> +{

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time

2015-06-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Neil and Stephen, On 6/4/15, 8:55 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 11:50:33AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> Hi Stephen >> >> On 6/3/15, 7:12 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" >>wrote: >> >> >On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:49:

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time

2015-06-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
org>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Wiles, Keith mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>> wrote: Hi Neil and Stephen, I agree this is not saving instructions and adding performance, but of code clutter a

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] eal:Add new API for parsing args at rte_eal_init time

2015-06-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hmmm, replied in HTML. >On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Wiles, Keith > wrote: > >Hi Neil and Stephen, > >I agree this is not saving instructions and adding performance, but of >code clutter and providing a layered model for the developer. The >rte_eal_init() ro

[dpdk-dev] The use of --log-level and its default state

2015-06-05 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/5/15, 5:00 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-05-27 15:10, Wiles, Keith: >> I would like to have the log-level default changed to not log >>everything, >> but the user needs to enable the log messages if he needs to see more >> information. Normal

[dpdk-dev] The use of --log-level and its default state

2015-06-05 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/5/15, 8:58 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >Keith, your mail is very long but it's maybe on purpose to show that >there are too many logs ;) Yes it was kind of the point, but only because I wanted to show the complete output. > >2015-06-05 12:32, Wiles, Keith: >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal:Fix log messages always being printed from rte_eal_cpu_init

2015-06-08 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/8/15, 6:09 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:04:05PM -0500, Keith Wiles wrote: >> The RTE_LOG(DEBUG, ...) messages in rte_eal_cpu_init() are printed >> even when the log level on the command line was set to INFO or lower. >> >> The problem is the

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal:Fix log messages always being printed from rte_eal_cpu_init

2015-06-08 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/8/15, 8:33 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > >On 6/8/15, 6:09 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" >wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:04:05PM -0500, Keith Wiles wrote: >>> The RTE_LOG(DEBUG, ...) messages in rte_eal_cpu_init() are printed >&

[dpdk-dev] DPDK-Pktgen

2015-06-16 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/16/15, 4:18 PM, "Assaad, Sami (Sami)" wrote: >Hello. > >I am using DPDK-Pktgen (Pktgen version 2.77 using DPDK-1.7.1). >My NIC consists of two 10G ports. Please try to use the latest version from here http://dpdk.org/browse/apps/pktgen-dpdk/refs/ The one you are using is fairly old now.

[dpdk-dev] dpdkvhostuser fail to alloc memory when receive packet from other host

2015-06-17 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/17/15, 4:49 AM, "Du, Fan" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm playing dpdkvhostuser ports with latest DPDK and ovs master tree with >iperf benchmarking. >When kvm guest1(backed up dpdkvhostuser port)siting on HOST1 is receiving >packets from either other physical HOST2, >or similar kvm guest2 with

[dpdk-dev] How do I leave this mailing list

2015-04-23 Thread Wiles, Keith
Try going here and you can input your email and password to unsubscribe. http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev Or just here for all email lists: http://dpdk.org/ml Regards, ++Keith On 4/22/15, 5:23 PM, "Vipin Agrawal" wrote: >What do I need to do to not receive any more emails? > >Thanks, >Vipin

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-25 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/25/15, 8:30 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote: > > >On 24/04/15 19:51, Matthew Hall wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:39:47PM -0500, Jay Rolette wrote: >>> I can tell you that if DPDK were GPL-based, my company wouldn't be >>>using >>> it. I suspect we wouldn't be the only ones... >>> >>> Jay >> I

[dpdk-dev] Compiling files with .S with GCC

2015-04-26 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi All, I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will not be used as the code is not linked. A strange error and the foo_s.o file would not be created. In the mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk we have the following # command to

[dpdk-dev] Compiling files with .S with GCC

2015-04-26 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >Hi All, > >I noticed in my builds with foo.S file I would get a warning from the >compiler the foo_s.o.tmp linker file will not be used as the code is not >linked. A strange error and the foo_s.o file would not be cre

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-27 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/26/15, 4:56 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 4/25/15, 8:30 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >On 24/04/15 19:51, Matthew Hall wrote: >&

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-27 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/27/15, 4:52 AM, "Marc Sune" wrote: > > >On 27/04/15 03:41, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> On 4/26/15, 4:56 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>>> >>>

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-27 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/27/15, 5:29 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 01:41:11AM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 4/26/15, 4:56 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >> >> >On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 04:08:23PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
I have not tested this change more then just building DPDK with GCC. On 4/28/15, 10:21 AM, "Keith Wiles" wrote: >Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use >the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Sergio On 4/28/15, 11:25 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" wrote: >On 28/04/2015 16:21, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use >> the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 6:51 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-04-29 13:08 GMT+02:00 Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio >: >> On 29/04/2015 11:12, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> It seems this is the second version of your patch. >>> Please add v2 prefix and a changelog to ease review and >>> patch management. >>> As

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 3:04 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" wrote: >On 28/04/2015 17:50, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> Hi Sergio >> >> On 4/28/15, 11:25 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" >> wrote: >> >>> On 28/04/2015 16:21, Keith Wiles wrote: >

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 9:09 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > >On 4/29/15, 3:04 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" > wrote: > >>On 28/04/2015 17:50, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>> Hi Sergio >>> >>> On 4/28/15, 11:25 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio&q

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Update Docs for new EXTRA_LDLIBS variable

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 9:55 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" wrote: >On 29/04/2015 15:37, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles >> --- >> doc/build-sdk-quick.txt | 1 + >> doc/guides/prog_guide/dev_kit_build_system.rst | 2 ++ >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 10:11 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:37:42AM -0500, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use >> the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Update Docs for new EXTRA_LDLIBS variable

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 10:04 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" wrote: >On 29/04/2015 16:00, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> On 4/29/15, 9:55 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" >> wrote: >> >>> On 29/04/2015 15:37, Keith Wiles wrote: >>>>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] Update Docs for new EXTRA_LDLIBS variable

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 10:19 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" wrote: >On 29/04/2015 16:16, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> On 4/29/15, 10:04 AM, "Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio" >> wrote: >> >>> On 29/04/2015 16:00, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>>> On 4/29/15,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-29 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/29/15, 12:17 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-04-29 10:25, Keith Wiles: >> -# Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >> -# Copyright(c) 2014 6WIND S.A. >> +# Copyright(c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. >> +# Copyright(c) 2015 6WIND S.A.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/30/15, 4:45 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >Thank you for submitting a clean-up. Please see some comments below. > >On 04/29/2015 05:25 PM, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/30/15, 8:38 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >On 04/30/2015 03:24 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 4/30/15, 4:45 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> Thank you for submitting a clean

[dpdk-dev] NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed?

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this: * NO_AUTOLIBS: If set, the libraries provided by the framework will not be included in the LDLIBS variable automatically. Why was this variable created, do we have really good reason? It seems like the variable removes almost

[dpdk-dev] NO_AUTOLIB is this variable really needed?

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/30/15, 11:24 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:55:47PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> What is the NO_AUTOLIB variable used for anyway, the doc states this: >> >> >> * NO_AUTOLIBS: If set, the libraries provided by th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 4/30/15, 11:22 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 02:31:13PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 4/30/15, 8:38 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >> >> >Hi Keith, >> > >> >On 04/30/2015 03:24 PM

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
(I snipped out the content here only because it had been snipped a lot already) Sorry, if I am highjacking the thread. I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the primary DPDK site. http://github.com I believe the DPDK community can benefit from being at a very well

[dpdk-dev] Beyond DPDK 2.0

2015-04-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
Darn forgot the site link, below. On 4/30/15, 4:31 PM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > >(I snipped out the content here only because it had been snipped a lot >already) > >Sorry, if I am highjacking the thread. > >I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving

[dpdk-dev] dpdk 2.0 - how to build the documentation

2015-08-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/2/15, 12:41 AM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-08-02 09:39, Kevin Wilson: >> I have downloaded dpdk-2.0.0.tar.gz from dpdk.org >> How do I build the documentation (pdf files)? > >They are available here: > http://dpdk.org/doc/archives/dpdk-2.0/pdf/guides/ >If you want

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] log:Change magic number on RTE_LOG_LEVEL to a define

2015-08-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/2/15, 12:15 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-06-06 19:04, Keith Wiles: >> --- a/config/common_bsdapp >> +++ b/config/common_bsdapp >> @@ -93,12 +93,18 @@ CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=8 >> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMSEG=256 >> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_MEMZONE=2560 >> CONFIG_RTE_MAX_TAILQ=32 >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] log:Change magic number on RTE_LOG_LEVEL to a define

2015-08-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/2/15, 2:10 PM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" wrote: >On 8/2/15, 12:15 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: > >>2015-06-06 19:04, Keith Wiles: >>> --- a/config/common_bsdapp >>> +++ b/config/common_bsdapp >>> @@ -93,12 +93,18 @@

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] log:Change magic number on RTE_LOG_LEVEL to a define

2015-08-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/2/15, 3:44 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-08-02 19:10, Wiles, Keith: >> On 8/2/15, 12:15 PM, "Thomas Monjalon" >>wrote: >> >2015-06-06 19:04, Keith Wiles: >> >> +# Log level use: RTE_LOG_XXX >> >> +# X

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] remove pci driver from vdevs

2015-08-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/28/15, 5:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Neil Horman" wrote: >On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 08:15:47AM +, Iremonger, Bernard wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: John W. Linville [mailto:linville at tuxdriver.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 6:44 PM >> > To:

[dpdk-dev] Build instructions

2015-08-28 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 8/28/15, 2:49 PM, "dev on behalf of Ratliff, Stanley" wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I'm a DPDK newbie, so my apologies for the na?ve question. I'm trying to >use the instructions at http://dpdk.org/doc/quick-start. > >I've cloned the DPDK repo, & started with the make command. I got: > >stanr

[dpdk-dev] 2.3 Roadmap

2015-12-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/1/15, 10:54 AM, "dev on behalf of Richardson, Bruce" wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole at redhat.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 3:31 PM >> To: Richardson, Bruce >> Cc: Panu Matilainen ; dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 2.3

[dpdk-dev] Building with 'make install T=' and 'make config T='

2015-12-09 Thread Wiles, Keith
I am having a problem with ?make install T=? command as I was using it before. I would normally build a x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc, clang and icc or a different config all together. Currently the ?make install T=? gives a warning message at the end of the build plus creates the

[dpdk-dev] Building with 'make install T=' and 'make config T='

2015-12-09 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/9/15, 8:59 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-09 14:39, Wiles, Keith: >> I am having a problem with ?make install T=? command as I was using it >> before. I would normally build a x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc, clang and icc >> or a different config al

[dpdk-dev] Building with 'make install T=' and 'make config T='

2015-12-09 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/9/15, 10:19 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-09 15:32, Wiles, Keith: >> On 12/9/15, 8:59 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >> >> >2015-12-09 14:39, Wiles, Keith: >> >> I am having a problem with ?make install T=? command as I was

[dpdk-dev] Building with 'make install T=' and 'make config T='

2015-12-09 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/9/15, 11:31 AM, "dev on behalf of Wiles, Keith" wrote: >On 12/9/15, 10:19 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: BTW, I am not overly concerned about the build system per say I just wish I had put my $0.02 worth in before the change. We can leave as it is now. The test-bui

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-15 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/15/15, 7:37 AM, "dev on behalf of O'Driscoll, Tim" wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon >> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 7:23 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] releases scheduling >> >> Hi all,

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-15 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/15/15, 1:15 PM, "dev on behalf of Dave Neary" wrote: >Hi, > >You could just bump the major version for the first release of the new >year - in this case, we would make 2.6 be 3.0. It achieves the same >objective without having a big discontinuity in the release numbers. I see the YY.MM.PP

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] version: 2.3.0-rc0

2015-12-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/18/15, 10:11 AM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-18 12:11, Bruce Richardson: >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 12:16:30PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon >> > --- >> > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_version.h | 6 +++--- >> > 1 file

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] mbuf: provide rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk API

2015-12-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/18/15, 11:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Stephen Hemminger" wrote: >On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:44:02 + >"Ananyev, Konstantin" wrote: > >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Hemminger >> > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 5:01

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] version: 2.3.0-rc0

2015-12-18 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/18/15, 1:50 PM, "O'Driscoll, Tim" wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith >> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 7:23 PM >> To: Thomas Monjalon; Richardson, Bruce >> Cc: dev at dpd

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon: >> We need to define the deadlines for the next releases. >> During 2015, we were doing a release every 4 months. >> If we keep the same pace, the next releases would be: >> 2.3: end of March

[dpdk-dev] releases scheduling

2015-12-19 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/19/15, 3:47 AM, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: >2015-12-19 02:16, Wiles, Keith: >> On 12/18/15, 6:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Thomas Monjalon" > dpdk.org on behalf of thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote: >> >> >2015-12-13 20:22, Thomas Monjalon:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] mbuf: provide rte_pktmbuf_alloc_bulk API

2015-12-21 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/21/15, 9:21 AM, "Xie, Huawei" wrote: >On 12/19/2015 3:27 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> On 12/18/15, 11:32 AM, "dev on behalf of Stephen Hemminger" > dpdk.org on behalf of stephen at networkplumber.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 18 Dec 20

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

2015-12-27 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/27/15, 12:31 PM, "dev on behalf of Laurent GUERBY" wrote: >Hi, > >I reported today an issue when using Pktgen-DPDK: >https://github.com/pktgen/Pktgen-DPDK/issues/52 > >But I think it's more in DPDK than pktgen > >two identical machines with SFP+ DA cable between them >DPDK 2.2.0 from

[dpdk-dev] Errors Rx count increasing while pktgen doing nothing on Intel 82598EB 10G

2015-12-27 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 12/27/15, 2:09 PM, "Laurent GUERBY" wrote: >On Sun, 2015-12-27 at 19:43 +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> On 12/27/15, 12:31 PM, "dev on behalf of Laurent GUERBY" > dpdk.org on behalf of laurent at guerby.net> wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples: new txburst application

2015-01-31 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 1/30/15, 1:45 PM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Jan 30, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Bhavesh Davda wrote: > >>> Did you know pktgen-dpdk? >>> http://dpdk.org/browse/apps/pktgen-dpdk/tree/README.md >>> >>> Do yo

[dpdk-dev] Why pktgen-dpdk will receive more packet than sent

2015-06-30 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 6/29/15, 9:01 PM, "dev on behalf of Jiang, Yunhong" wrote: >Hi, all > I'm trying to test the l2fwd throughput using >https://github.com/pktgen/Pktgen-DPDK/blob/master/dpdk/examples/pktgen/scr >ipts/rfc2544.lua . However, the pktgen will receive more packets than it >sent out like "

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: prevent dereferencing NULL pointer in rte_eal_devargs_add()

2015-03-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/2/15, 6:23 AM, "David Marchand" wrote: >Hello Pawel, > >On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Pawel Wodkowski >> wrote: > >> On failure devargs->args should not be accesed if devargs is NULL. >> > >accessed. > > >> >> Signed-off-by: Pawel Wodkowski >> --- >>

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: prevent dereferencing NULL pointer in rte_eal_devargs_add()

2015-03-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/2/15, 8:55 AM, "Wodkowski, PawelX" wrote: >On 2015-03-02 15:40, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 3/2/15, 6:23 AM, "David Marchand" wrote: >> >>> Hello Pawel, >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Pawel Wodkow

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] External app builds need to locate common make fragments and includes.

2015-03-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/4/15, 3:08 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >On 02/28/2015 05:56 PM, Keith Wiles wrote: >> When building an external application like Pktgen and using the proper >> makefile fragments rte.extXYZ.mk NOT rte.XYZ.mk files as you would >> use with example applications in the same

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] External app builds need to locate common make fragments and includes.

2015-03-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Olivier On 3/4/15, 10:40 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >On 03/04/2015 05:11 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 3/4/15, 3:08 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> On 02/28/2015 05:

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] External app builds need to locate common make fragments and includes.

2015-03-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/4/15, 10:47 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >Hi Olivier > >On 3/4/15, 10:40 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: > >>Hi Keith, >> >>On 03/04/2015 05:11 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 3/4/15, 3:08 AM, "Olivier MA

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] External app builds need to locate common make fragments and includes.

2015-03-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Olivier, On 3/4/15, 11:04 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >On 03/04/2015 05:47 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> Hi Olivier >> >> On 3/4/15, 10:40 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >> >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> On 03/04/201

[dpdk-dev] Memory issues seen while running pktgen with DPDK sample application

2015-03-08 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Shankari, Please show the command lines you are using for the two applications. On 3/8/15, 11:10 AM, "Shankari Vaidyalingam" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm trying to send packets from pktgen to exception path sample >application. >My configuration is like this: > >|--Terminal 1---

[dpdk-dev] Memory issues seen while running pktgen with DPDK sample application

2015-03-08 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/8/15, 5:11 PM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >Hi Shankari, > >Please show the command lines you are using for the two applications. Sorry, you did show the command lines. > > > >On 3/8/15, 11:10 AM, "Shankari Vaidyalingam" >wrote: > >>Hi, >

[dpdk-dev] pktgen rx errors with intel 82599

2015-03-14 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Matt On 3/13/15, 3:49 PM, "Matt Smith" wrote: > >Hi, > >I?ve been using DPDK pktgen 2.8.0 (built against DPDK 1.8.0 libraries) to >send traffic on a server using an Intel 82599 (X520-2). Traffic gets sent >out port 1 through another server which also an Intel 82599 installed and >is

[dpdk-dev] pktgen rx errors with intel 82599

2015-03-14 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Matt, On 3/14/15, 8:47 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >Hi Matt > >On 3/13/15, 3:49 PM, "Matt Smith" wrote: > >> >>Hi, >> >>I?ve been using DPDK pktgen 2.8.0 (built against DPDK 1.8.0 libraries) to >>send traffic on a server using a

[dpdk-dev] Queries on Pktgen

2015-03-15 Thread Wiles, Keith
From: Shankari Vaidyalingam mailto:shankari.v...@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 2:53 AM To: "dev at dpdk.org" mailto:dev at dpdk.org>> Cc: Keith Wiles mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>> Subject: Queries on Pktgen Hi, For testing an application that I'd

[dpdk-dev] Lua documentation - Pktgen

2015-03-15 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/15/15, 2:54 AM, "Shankari Vaidyalingam" wrote: >Hi, > >Would like to know if there is some document available for understanding >how to write Lua script to use with pktgen. Goto www.lua.org and look at the example scripts. Lua is pretty easy to learn and you need to know Lua a bit before

[dpdk-dev] Queries on Pktgen

2015-03-16 Thread Wiles, Keith
line and the startup output. Also the flags for the port you assigned the PCAP file too. Normally the port that is attached to the the PCAP file will send the PCAP when started. Regards Shankari.V On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Wiles, Keith mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>&

[dpdk-dev] [Pktgen] Re: Queries on Pktgen

2015-03-16 Thread Wiles, Keith
t it also doesnt seem to recognize. Please let me know how to resolve this. Regards Shankari.V On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Wiles, Keith mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>> wrote: From: Shankari Vaidyalingam mailto:shankari.v...@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday, March 15, 2015 at 2:53

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: optimize refcnt handling during free

2015-03-26 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 3/26/15, 1:10 PM, "Zoltan Kiss" wrote: >The current way is not the most efficient: if m->refcnt is 1, the second >condition never evaluates, and we set it to 0. If refcnt > 1, the 2nd >condition fails again, although the code suggest otherwise to branch >prediction. Instead we should keep

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-01 Thread Wiles, Keith
Hi Everyone, I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the primary DPDK site. http://github.com I believe the DPDK community can benefit from being at a very well know world wide site. GitHub seems to have the most eyes of any of the open source Git repos today and it

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-01 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 12:31 PM, "Matthew Hall" wrote: >Normally I'm a big command-line supporter. However I have found reviewing >patches by email for me is about the most painful workflow. > >The emails are pages and pages. > >The replies from commenters are buried in the walls of text. > >Replies to

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-01 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 11:45 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:56:32PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the >> primary DPDK site. http://github.com >> &

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-01 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 1:09 PM, "Stephen Hemminger" wrote: >On Fri, 1 May 2015 15:56:32 +0000 >"Wiles, Keith" wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the >> primary DPDK site. http://githu

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-01 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 1:48 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: >> > Yes, but as you said above, using a web browser doesn't make >>reviewing patches >> > faster. In fact, I would assert

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 2:10 PM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: > > >On 5/1/15, 1:48 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: > >>On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: >>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:45:12PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: >>> > Y

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/2/15, 6:40 AM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:36:58PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:59:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: >> > Projects like GCC, GLIBC, binutils, busybox, etc or what? >> > >> > A. >> >> You'll notice all of these are low-level

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-02 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/2/15, 7:37 AM, "Thomas F Herbert" wrote: >On 5/2/15 7:40 AM, Neil Horman wrote: >> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 01:36:58PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: >>> On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:59:32PM +0300, Aaro Koskinen wrote: Projects like GCC, GLIBC, binutils, busybox, etc or what? A.

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Neil On 5/3/15, 2:00 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:10:11PM +, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 5/1/15, 1:48 PM, "Neil Horman" wrote: >> >> >On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 10:31:08AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: >

[dpdk-dev] GitHub sandbox for the DPDK community

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/1/15, 10:56 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >Hi Everyone, > >I believe the DPDK community would benefit from moving to GitHub as the >primary DPDK site. http://github.com Here is a good page showing the GitHub features: https://github.com/features/ > >I believe th

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/4/15, 2:18 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hi Keith, > >On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use >> the same style as LDLIBS-y being used in the rest of the

[dpdk-dev] Compiling files with .S with GCC

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/4/15, 1:37 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >Hello, > >On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 4/26/15, 11:53 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I noticed in my builds with fo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] Simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk.

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
Sent from my iPhone > On May 4, 2015, at 2:19 AM, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > Hi Keith, > >> On 05/01/2015 04:22 PM, Keith Wiles wrote: >> Trying to simplify the ifdefs in rte.app.mk to make the code >> more readable and maintainable by moving LDLIBS variable to use >> the same style as LDLIBS-y

[dpdk-dev] Compiling files with .S with GCC

2015-05-04 Thread Wiles, Keith
On 5/4/15, 8:42 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: > > >On 05/04/2015 04:49 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote: >> >> >> On 5/4/15, 1:37 AM, "Olivier MATZ" wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 04/26/2015 06:55 PM, Wiles, Keith wrot

  1   2   3   4   >