Sorry, it seems that I missed this email.
On 4/5/2018 5:45 PM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
Hi
Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
---
Note this patch needs this patch set:
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/36814/
v2:
- Update doc for deprecation of API, rte_pdump_set_socket_dir,
and API change f
On 4/5/2018 6:37 PM, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Tan, Jianfeng
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 4:08 PM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Tan, Jianfeng ; Pattan, Reshma
Subject: [PATCH v2] pdump: change to use generic multi-process channel
The original code replies on the pr
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Tan, Jianfeng
> Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2018 4:08 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Tan, Jianfeng ; Pattan, Reshma
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] pdump: change to use generic multi-process channel
>
> The original code replies on the private channel for primary and
Hi
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
> ---
> Note this patch needs this patch set:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/36814/
> v2:
> - Update doc for deprecation of API, rte_pdump_set_socket_dir,
> and API change for rte_pdump_init.
> - Add notice for known incompatibility issue in doc.
The original code replies on the private channel for primary and
secondary communication. Change to use the generic multi-process
channel.
Note with this change, dpdk-pdump will be not compatible with
old version DPDK applications.
Cc: reshma.pat...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan
---
Not
5 matches
Mail list logo
