Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix build with ring pmd but no bond pmd

2020-07-01 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:09 PM David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:58 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > If the bonding pmd is disabled, all autotest associated with it should be > > disabled. However, some of those tests also depended upon the ring PMD so > > were placed in a b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix build with ring pmd but no bond pmd

2020-07-01 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:05 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Just a note. > > Looking at the makefile counterpart, I can see that if we disable the > > null driver, we would have an issue too. > > > I'm not actually seeing an error with it in meson builds. Running a quick > test using build paramet

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix build with ring pmd but no bond pmd

2020-06-29 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:09:20PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:58 PM Bruce Richardson > wrote: > > > > If the bonding pmd is disabled, all autotest associated with it should be > > disabled. However, some of those tests also depended upon the ring PMD so > > were place

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/test: fix build with ring pmd but no bond pmd

2020-06-29 Thread David Marchand
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:58 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > If the bonding pmd is disabled, all autotest associated with it should be > disabled. However, some of those tests also depended upon the ring PMD so > were placed in a block depending on that driver - and unfortunately that > driver alon