k.org>>,
> Harish Patil mailto:harish.pa...@cavium.com>>,
> "Mody,
> Rasesh" mailto:rasesh.m...@cavium.com>>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: reserve enough headroom for mbuf
> prepend
>
> When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m
;Mody,
Rasesh" mailto:rasesh.m...@cavium.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnx2x: reserve enough headroom for mbuf
prepend
When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m->data_off should be
reset to its default value (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), instead of reusing
the previous
On 3/8/2018 5:57 AM, zhouyangchao wrote:
> When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m->data_off should be
> reset to its default value (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), instead of reusing
> the previous undefined value, which could cause the packet to have a too
> small or too high headroom.
Hi Ha
When allocating a new mbuf for Rx, the value of m->data_off should be
reset to its default value (RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), instead of reusing
the previous undefined value, which could cause the packet to have a too
small or too high headroom.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> O
On 2/6/2018 11:21 AM, zhouyangchao wrote:
Can you please provide more information why this patch is needed?
> Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou
> ---
> drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_rxtx.c b/dr
On 2/6/2018 11:21 AM, zhouyangchao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Yangchao Zhou
Hi Yangchao,
There are multiple version of this patch and all seems marked as rejected in
patchwork, intentionally?
If not can you please update the correct one as new in patchwork?
6 matches
Mail list logo
