Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: add rte flow support

2018-04-24 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 4/24/2018 1:54 PM, Doherty, Declan wrote: > Firstly, apologies on the very large delay on reviewing this. This looks > good to me and I've verified that flow configuration propagates as > expected to bonded slaves using IXGBE PMDs for testing. > > I had to do some minor rebasing to get the pa

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: add rte flow support

2018-04-24 Thread Doherty, Declan
Firstly, apologies on the very large delay on reviewing this. This looks good to me and I've verified that flow configuration propagates as expected to bonded slaves using IXGBE PMDs for testing. I had to do some minor rebasing to get the patch to apply cleanly to next-net, so I'll leave it up

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: add rte flow support

2018-04-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
12/04/2018 19:27, Ferruh Yigit: > On 3/28/2018 12:16 PM, Matan Azrad wrote: > > Ethernet devices which are grouped by bonding PMD, aka slaves, are > > sharing the same queues and RSS configurations and their Rx burst > > functions must be managed by the bonding PMD according to the bonding > > arch

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bonding: add rte flow support

2018-04-12 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 3/28/2018 12:16 PM, Matan Azrad wrote: > Ethernet devices which are grouped by bonding PMD, aka slaves, are > sharing the same queues and RSS configurations and their Rx burst > functions must be managed by the bonding PMD according to the bonding > architectuer. > > So, it makes sense to confi