Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
02/12/2019 16:29, David Marchand: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > --- a/VERSION > > +++ b/VERSION > > @@ -1 +1 @@ > > -19.11.0 > > +20.02-rc0 > > 20.02.0-rc0 ? > > The rest lgtm. Applied with this change.
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Monday 2 December 2019 16:13 > To: Kinsella, Ray > Cc: Richardson, Bruce ; David Marchand > ; dev ; Neil Horman > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0 > > 02/12/2019 16:43, Kinsella, Ray: > > QQ. > > > > What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI > stability? > > Very good point Ray! > For longer periods it would not mach DPDK version number. > > So we keep standard scheme of increasing by +1 every quarter? > > > > > From: Bruce Richardson > > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 for an easy > > > > > mapping with code version: > > > > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > > > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > > > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > > > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > > > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > > > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > > > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > > > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > > > +1 but no strong opinion. > > > > > > > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way. > > > > > >
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
QQ. What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability? Ray K > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Richardson > Sent: Monday 2 December 2019 15:40 > To: David Marchand > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev ; Neil > Horman ; Kinsella, Ray > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0 > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > --- > > > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 for an easy > > > mapping with code version: > > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > +1 but no strong opinion. > > > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way.
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
02/12/2019 16:43, Kinsella, Ray: > QQ. > > What do you plan to do then, when you go for longer periods of ABI stability? Very good point Ray! For longer periods it would not mach DPDK version number. So we keep standard scheme of increasing by +1 every quarter? > From: Bruce Richardson > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 for an easy > > > > mapping with code version: > > > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > > > > > Opinions? > > > > > > +1 but no strong opinion. > > > > > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way. >
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 04:29:06PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > > > --- > > > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 > > for an easy mapping with code version: > > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > > > Opinions? > > +1 but no strong opinion. > I like that idea too, though again no strong opinion either way.
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.02-rc0
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:57 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > --- > > I would prefer increasing the ABI version to 20.2 > for an easy mapping with code version: > DPDK 19.11 = ABI 20 > libs 19.11 = .so.20.0 > DPDK 20.02 = ABI 20 > libs 20.02 = .so.20.2 > DPDK 20.05 = ABI 20 > libs 20.05 = .so.20.5 > DPDK 20.08 = ABI 20 > libs 20.08 = .so.20.8 > > Opinions? +1 but no strong opinion. > --- > ABI_VERSION| 2 +- > VERSION| 2 +- > doc/guides/rel_notes/index.rst | 1 + > doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_02.rst | 139 + > 4 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_02.rst > > diff --git a/ABI_VERSION b/ABI_VERSION > index 9a7c1e503f..2e73f8d2aa 100644 > --- a/ABI_VERSION > +++ b/ABI_VERSION > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -20.0 > +20.1 > diff --git a/VERSION b/VERSION > index 22131b00aa..7b50df9859 100644 > --- a/VERSION > +++ b/VERSION > @@ -1 +1 @@ > -19.11.0 > +20.02-rc0 20.02.0-rc0 ? The rest lgtm. -- David Marchand
