Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const
2017-01-12 21:54, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Really trivial patches. > > Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. This is a nice example of why patches are not merged timely, sometimes they are not received at all :) In order to reduce the time needed to merge, could you please run devtools/check-git-log.sh ?
Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const
On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Really trivial patches. Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > bnx: make eth_dev_ops const > ena: make eth_dev_ops const > > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 +- Right, ena and bnxt are missing const for eth_dev_ops. Do you want me send patches? > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >
