On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:39:23AM -0800, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-01-20 16:43, Yuanhan Liu:
> > 16.07 as a first trial of stable release, I made a proposal to have 2
> > releases: v16.07.1 shortly after v16.11-rc1 and v16.07.2 shortly after
> > v16.11. While the gap between v16.07 and v16.11
2017-01-20 16:43, Yuanhan Liu:
> 16.07 as a first trial of stable release, I made a proposal to have 2
> releases: v16.07.1 shortly after v16.11-rc1 and v16.07.2 shortly after
> v16.11. While the gap between v16.07 and v16.11 are 4 months, doing a
> release each 2 month doesn't seem that bad. It m
2017-01-13 13:06, John McNamara:
> Add document explaining the current Stable and LTS process.
>
> Signed-off-by: John McNamara
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
Applied, thanks
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 01:06:22PM +, John McNamara wrote:
> Add document explaining the current Stable and LTS process.
John, great doc! Thanks.
Here I got one more thing to discuss about the stable release: the release
cycle. (I may better start a new thread, but I hope it would be a short
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 4:29 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Liu, Yuanhan
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] doc: add guidelines on stable and lts releases
>
> 2017-01-13 13:14, Mcnamara, John:
>
2017-01-13 13:14, Mcnamara, John:
> Just a reminder that DPDK 16.07 was a stable release, 16.11 is a stable
> release and it will also become the 2 year LTS release.
There should be a roadmap for the stable releases,
giving end of life dates.
What about updating this page? http://dpdk.org/dev/roa
> -Original Message-
> From: Mcnamara, John
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017 1:06 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Liu, Yuanhan ; thomas.monja...@6wind.com;
> Mcnamara, John
> Subject: [PATCH v1] doc: add guidelines on stable and lts releases
>
> Add document explaining the current Stable and
7 matches
Mail list logo
