On 2019/10/27 1:15, David Marchand wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:55 PM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote:
The title does not reflect the observed issue.
I would like to consider to revise it.
I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker
container.
I've confirmed that second
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:55 PM Yasufumi Ogawa wrote:
> >>
> >> The title does not reflect the observed issue.
> I would like to consider to revise it.
>
> >> I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker
> >> container.
> I've confirmed that secondary process can be start
Hi David,
Thank you for your comments.
On 2019/10/26 0:36, David Marchand wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM David Marchand
wrote:
Some comments.
ping.
The title does not reflect the observed issue.
I would like to consider to revise it.
I understand that secondary processeses
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:36 AM David Marchand
wrote:
>
> Some comments.
ping.
>
> The title does not reflect the observed issue.
> I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker
> container.
> The patch title should reflect this.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 AM w
Some comments.
The title does not reflect the observed issue.
I understand that secondary processeses can't be started from a docker
container.
The patch title should reflect this.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:20 AM wrote:
>
> From: Yasufumi Ogawa
>
> In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a
On 24-Jul-19 9:20 AM, yasufu...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Yasufumi Ogawa
In secondary_msl_create_walk(), it creates a file for fbarrays with its
PID for reserving unique name among secondary processes. However, it
does not work if secondary is run as app container because each of
containerized sec
6 matches
Mail list logo
